Tupac or Aaliyah?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

Who will end up having more posthumous work released?

  • Tupac Shakur (1971-1996; solo career 1991-2001)

    Votes: 8 34.8%
  • Aaliyah (1979-2001; solo career 1994-?)

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Keith Richards (1943-1972; I mean he LOOKS dead))

    Votes: 2 8.7%
  • Paul McCartney (1942-1965; Paul is dead, man - miss him, MISS HIM)

    Votes: 12 52.2%

  • Total voters
    23
On instinct, I voted for Tupac ...

After voting, I did some hunting ... there have been fiev albums released after his death.

In the course of doing my hunting, I also discovered some odd "Tupac is Alive" theories ... the likes of which we haven't seen since Elvis died ... Tupac is Alive
 
I once saw a black comedian say that "Tupac is the hardest working dead [man] in show business."

I must concur.
 
How come (most) singers are not liked or respected untill after thier death?

Even thought Tupac and Aaliyah are gone, that doesn't mean you have to like them. I think it's very sad that Aaliyah died at such a young age, but I never really liked her music:angel: :(
 
qball7200 said:
Jeff Buckley should be one of the choices.

While his music is awesome ... and has gained in popularity since his death, I don't think we're ging to be hearing and "unrealeased" material like Tupac.
 
Tupac is the MAN! I love to hear the conspiracy theories that he is really alive. For example:
 

Attachments

  • sighting.jpg
    sighting.jpg
    56.9 KB · Views: 18
Back
Top Bottom