Like an earlier poster said, I get your drift about not limiting oneself to the mainstream, but you're way too aggressive with the way you make your point. If you want to expose someone to what's out there, this is the worst possible way to do it.
Also, I think there's a lot of people who HAVE heard many of the albums on your list, just don't have the same passion for those records you do. You may be mistaking indifference for ignorance. People simply have different tastes, and by definition the majority have tastes that are rather mainstream. We're on a U2 message board for Chrissake. What were you expecting?
Well said. I've listened to over half of Macphisto's list, and even have a bunch of choices that are the same. That being said, I think a lot of the albums on his list are merely good/average, and would never consider putting them in a top album of the decade list.
I've listened to a lot of new "indie" music over the past couple years, and a lot of it is as great as Macphisto is saying. However, I would never say it's better than the classic era of the 60s/70s (Especially since it was the classics that influenced these new bands anyways), and I wouldn't chastise people who lean towards more mainstream stuff because you just come off as pretentious.