coolian2
Blue Crack Supplier
For an oval ground, Kogarah is nice and compact. I'd love to see a game there.
coolian2 said:
I'm just going to say it. More countries playing softball/baseball have more chance of winning than countries playing rugby. It seems lose-lose, as interesting as it would be.
Aw, Royal Brunei is going off frequency now. Great voice and accent though.
Axver said:Another one of my beloved Z3s at the intersection of William and Collins Streets.
Axver said:
The reason softball and baseball are being cut is because they don't meet the Olympic requirements of enough countries on enough continents playing them. Rugby does. So I question your point.
Axver said:Here I was trying to be arty.
Two Z3s on William Street about to cross Collins.
coolian2 said:
To me a tram is like the city circle ones you've been posting. I still can't get used to the idea of new-fangled trams.
coolian2 said:
Playing with a realistic chance of winning?
I can't be bothered getting into this tonight, again.
I feel as though rugby at the Olympics would be like football and the Olympics. Some type of weirded out bastardised form of the game with all sorts of odd eligibility rules
Axver said:
I find the Z class to be a transition class. Although they were built in the 1970s, in terms of their design they still draw upon techniques from the 1930s. Just compare the Z3 with my absolute favourite tram ever, Wellington's Fiducia:
Probably I'm so partial to the Z3 because they remind me of the Fiducia. Roughly similar length and the fronts are clearly quite similar with the slanted windscreen and destination board jutting out and placement of the route number on the top right.
I am entirely opposed to the low-floor articulated trams.
Axver said:
I suppose it's a question of what you prioritise - global participation, in which rugby quite strongly wins by the Olympic criteria, or chance of winning, which you probably do have a point. If you just used sevens as it is, it would be New Zealand vs Fiji and maybe South Africa would have a faint chance. I bet it'll have weird eligibility rules, though.
Incidentally, apparently cricket meets the global participation criteria and may be in the Olympics soon. The rise of Twenty20 is a big help there.
coolian2 said:
To me a tram is like the city circle ones you've been posting. I still can't get used to the idea of new-fangled trams.
coolian2 said:
Now that's a tram.
Axver said:
And here's its controls!
Things sure have moved on from that. Melbourne trammies have a pretty fancy set of buttons and knobs at their disposal now.
gvox said:Cool tram pics Axver.. we have a few of them still in Toronto...guess they call them streetcars..but they are not as classic/vintage as those, is that one above still in operation?
coolian2 said:
Ah, the good old days.
Reminds me of this cartoon
coolian2 said:
lol, i almost have the same issue with cricket, although with Twenty20 it's a bit more open
coolian2 said:Shit, i just realised i need to be kinda productive tomorrow. I'll go to sleep at 3am, aka 8 minutes away
Axver said:
Yeah, Twenty20 could be fairly interesting. ODI would take forever and Australia would own everyone.
I do wonder, though, if being in the Olympics would help broaden the scope of winners for either sport. Probably not. But optimism, you know.
coolian2 said:Those really are great.
And so much better than trolley buses.
Axver said:
Ugh, I hate trolley buses. I mean, I'm glad Wellington's got some, as they're cleaner than regular buses, but if you're going to tie your transport network to fixed infrastructure, it makes sense to simply make it a tramway - even more efficient and much higher capacity.
gvox said:Ax that's pretty funny - your oldest in operation is older than our oldest, and your most modern probably beats out ours by a good few years, that really does look modern!
I need to dig a few out...they're mostly red with some yellow and red ones too..