Even if they come to an agreement, I won't care about the 2 dozen games they play to determine the playoff teams. I mean, the Stanley Cup winning team will probably have more wins in the playoffs 16, then in the regular season. It would be ridiculous.
Maurice Richard trophy awarded to Vincent LeCavalier with 10 goals.
Art Ross trophy with 30 points, Ilya Kovalchuk.
No, thanks. Wait until the fall, and right now the fans should boycott hockey if they do settle. We should not give them our dollars via live attendance or TV ratings. Neither the owners nor the players give a damn about the fans or the thousands of people who depend on jobs related to the industry.
The fans should respond with an initial boycott powerful enough to send a strong message to both sides not to f**k with hockey anymore. Empty stadiums would be the best message, but I doubt that will happen. I, for one, will not watch hockey for a while.
Besides, hockey sucks now. I only watch the playoffs. Too much clutching, grabbing, mediocre games, subjective rules
-if a team gets 3 penalities in a row, you can be sure the next one will be against the opposing team no matter what. Gotta even it up. If a pitcher walks 5 batters in a row, the umpire ain't gonna call ball four next inning against the opposing pitcher to even up the walks, is he?
-Brett Hull's foot was in the crease back in '99. I don't care who won the Cup but call the bloody rule when it counts the most ( rule is now dead of course) The league lost credibility when the question of "what would they do if someone's foot was in the crease when the Cup winning goal was scored" Answer: nothing
-rarely are penalities called in OT, the mentality is let the players decide the game. Rubbish!
-no red line, bigger nets, bigger ice, smaller goalie equipment, move nets back, move nets forward, paint the lines bigger, no touch icing, tag up offsides, What other major sport tinkers with its game every bloody year? It's ridiculous. I say go back to the year of the highest scoring which was not a Gretzky year and use those rules. Reason: people love goals, not 3-1 or 2-0 with only 40 shots on goal between the 2 teams. Or make a rule and tell the refs to call it no matter what, the players will adapt. Jeez, back in '99 some players were lifting their feet while skating along the edge of the ice to avoid having a foot in the crease
-give coaches guaranteed contracts with no firing clauses so they start coaching to win and stop coaching not to lose. They are afraid of losing and having a poor win/loss record which could leave to their firing. They don't take risks during the games anymore, gotta use the trap, have 2 men back, block all the shots, Boring.
The worst thing is they know there is something wrong with game but do they ask the people who have the most valuable opinion on how to fix it? No, they discuss it amongst themselves. Hello, they are on the ice playing and coaching, we the fans watch and pay for the entertainment. Fans should have some input on what is needed to fix hockey, we know what we want to see, not the owners or players
Sorry about the rant but the NHL and the NHLPA are pissing me off especially now that Goodenow has accepted the premise of a salary cap. We spent the last 7 plus months listening to " NO SALARY CAP EVER" and NOW, with a handful of games to go, sure, let's negotiate a salary cap. GRRRRRR! That is what they should have spent the last 7 plus months negotiating. That cap level alone could take a year to settle. Dumbasses!
If anyone is offended or thinks my remarks are ignorant, sorry but I had to get it off my chest. Ah, I feel better.
Hoping for the return of an exciting, dynamic meaningful hockey season in the near future.