Slimness ( or the lack of it ) index - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Lemonade Stand > Lemonade Stand Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-24-2003, 06:44 AM   #1
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Song of the week "sentimental" by Porcupine Tree
Posts: 3,854
Local Time: 04:37 AM
Slimness ( or the lack of it ) index

I deviced a way to know whether anyone is more slim than me.

I am 171 cms, was 59 kgs ( had gained weight earlier this year) lost weight due to illness currently 51 kgs.

so my slimness index = 171/51 = 3.353

anyone having higher value than this is slimmer to me..

i think somewhere around 2.7 should be just about ideal.

conversion

1 pound = 0.454 kg
1 feet = 12 inches
1 inch = 2.54 cm
1 stone = 6.4 kg ( approx)

anyone !!

AcrobatMan
__________________

__________________
AcrobatMan is offline  
Old 12-24-2003, 09:01 AM   #2
Acrobat
 
Northeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wicked cold Vermont
Posts: 484
Local Time: 11:37 PM
If I converted right I am 165 cm and 59 kg that would be 2.79, slimmer !!
__________________

__________________
Northeast is offline  
Old 12-24-2003, 09:01 AM   #3
Blue Crack Addict
 
Laura M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 18,932
Local Time: 05:37 AM
I got 2.1

I dont think I did it right

__________________
Laura M is offline  
Old 12-24-2003, 09:17 AM   #4
Acrobat
 
Northeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wicked cold Vermont
Posts: 484
Local Time: 11:37 PM
You could have.......i am 5 feet 5 inches give or take a few millimeters and 130lbs....
__________________
Northeast is offline  
Old 12-24-2003, 12:32 PM   #5
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
bammo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In a car with House and Wilson :yikes: Let me out!! Let me oooooooouuut!!!
Posts: 5,660
Local Time: 05:37 AM
I got 2.46 - I'm pretty certain I did it wrong considering that I am not exactly skinny..........
__________________
bammo2 is offline  
Old 12-24-2003, 12:41 PM   #6
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Mr. BAW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Life's too short to drink cheap wine!
Posts: 12,336
Local Time: 09:37 PM
Re: Slimness ( or the lack of it ) index

Quote:
Originally posted by AcrobatMan
I deviced a way to know whether anyone is more slim than me.

I am 171 cms, was 59 kgs ( had gained weight earlier this year) lost weight due to illness currently 51 kgs.

so my slimness index = 171/51 = 3.353

anyone having higher value than this is slimmer to me..

i think somewhere around 2.7 should be just about ideal.

conversion

1 pound = 0.454 kg
1 feet = 12 inches
1 inch = 2.54 cm
1 stone = 6.4 kg ( approx)

anyone !!

AcrobatMan





I think that was the size of the stone Dreadsox had! Hope you're feeling much better Friend!!!




PS - I don't plan on counting my index...All I hear is Buzz Lightyear yelling at me "Infinity and beyond!!!"
__________________
Mr. BAW is offline  
Old 12-24-2003, 08:04 PM   #7
Acrobat
 
Squishy Peanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 383
Local Time: 04:37 AM
Hmm I'm a 2.67
__________________
Squishy Peanut is offline  
Old 12-25-2003, 02:43 AM   #8
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Song of the week "sentimental" by Porcupine Tree
Posts: 3,854
Local Time: 04:37 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by bammo2
I got 2.46 - I'm pretty certain I did it wrong considering that I am not exactly skinny..........
no you did it right

2.4 is not supposed to be skinny..its very close to ideal 2.7..better than 3.3 anyway

2.7 is ideal.

3 or 3.3 or 3.5 is supposed to be skinny...the greater the more skinny

anything less than 2.7 is the opposite of skinny...i mean the farther away you are from 2.7 on the lower side..the more non-skinny...

i hope u all understood
__________________
AcrobatMan is offline  
Old 12-25-2003, 02:45 AM   #9
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Song of the week "sentimental" by Porcupine Tree
Posts: 3,854
Local Time: 04:37 AM
anyone > 3.3 ...
__________________
AcrobatMan is offline  
Old 12-25-2003, 07:41 AM   #10
Jesus Online
 
Angela Harlem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: a glass castle
Posts: 30,163
Local Time: 03:37 PM
that can't be right.
i am not 2.28
__________________
<a href=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v196/angelaharlem/thPaul_Roos28.jpg target=_blank>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...aul_Roos28.jpg</a>
Angela Harlem is offline  
Old 12-25-2003, 07:43 AM   #11
Jesus Online
 
Angela Harlem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: a glass castle
Posts: 30,163
Local Time: 03:37 PM
ooh non skinny. i see.

hrmph.

heiffer is me

__________________
<a href=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v196/angelaharlem/thPaul_Roos28.jpg target=_blank>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...aul_Roos28.jpg</a>
Angela Harlem is offline  
Old 12-25-2003, 08:12 AM   #12
you are what you is
 
Salome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 22,016
Local Time: 05:37 AM
about 2.27
__________________
“Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.”
~Frank Zappa
Salome is offline  
Old 12-25-2003, 10:48 AM   #13
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Song of the week "sentimental" by Porcupine Tree
Posts: 3,854
Local Time: 04:37 AM
salome & angela harlem

made for each other
__________________
AcrobatMan is offline  
Old 12-25-2003, 04:31 PM   #14
Blue Crack Addict
 
beli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In a frock in Western Australia
Posts: 15,464
Local Time: 12:37 PM
Im 2.3 but then Im pregnant so thats okay. And no, the fact that I have put on weight faster then I should have for the size of the baby has NOTHING to do with the all the turkish bread I have consumed.

PS Mr BAW We have the sounds of Woody cowboy and Bullseye to contend with. I just woke up with a barrel of monkeys in my hair. The good news is I think we have lost 2 already!
__________________
beli is offline  
Old 12-25-2003, 05:30 PM   #15
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
bammo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In a car with House and Wilson :yikes: Let me out!! Let me oooooooouuut!!!
Posts: 5,660
Local Time: 05:37 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by AcrobatMan


no you did it right

2.4 is not supposed to be skinny..its very close to ideal 2.7..better than 3.3 anyway

2.7 is ideal.

3 or 3.3 or 3.5 is supposed to be skinny...the greater the more skinny

anything less than 2.7 is the opposite of skinny...i mean the farther away you are from 2.7 on the lower side..the more non-skinny...

i hope u all understood
ah-ha!!! It all makes sense now!!

Although I think the weight I used to calculate this is completely wrong now. I haven't weighed myself for a couple of weeks and I've been eating about twice as much as usual, using the excuse of Christmas......
__________________

__________________
bammo2 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com