Single's Ad. Why is she single? - Page 2 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Lemonade Stand > Lemonade Stand Archive
Click Here to Login
View Poll Results: Why is this girl single?
She's too honest. 2 6.90%
She's too coniving. 3 10.34%
She's a headache. 6 20.69%
All of the above. 18 62.07%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-15-2007, 09:16 PM   #16
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Stateless
Posts: 56,420
Local Time: 09:34 PM
if she's posting a singles ad on craigs list she's a fat ugly whore anyway.

next.
__________________

__________________
Headache in a Suitcase is online now  
Old 12-15-2007, 10:06 PM   #17
Blue Crack Addict
 
mysterious_jen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: U2 360 2010 DOWNUNDER
Posts: 15,556
Local Time: 12:04 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Danny Boy
So, her new boyfriend wrote a response for her, or at least dictated it to her. No way the same gold digger who made the original post authored that response.
thats what i thought, or she found a thesaurus
__________________

__________________
mysterious_jen is offline  
Old 12-15-2007, 11:46 PM   #18
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
maycocksean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Most Important State in the Union
Posts: 4,882
Local Time: 09:34 PM
Unfortunately, big words are no substitute for wit. As far as I could tell (and I concede I didn't understand all the jargon) "she" failed to provide a compelling retort and resorted to financialese insults.

Personally, I'm pretty certain all three posts were "fake" anyway.
__________________
maycocksean is offline  
Old 12-16-2007, 01:48 PM   #19
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
randhail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Outside Providence
Posts: 3,557
Local Time: 09:34 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Headache in a Suitcase
if she's posting a singles ad on craigs list she's a fat ugly whore anyway.

next.
She's probably not even a woman.
__________________
randhail is offline  
Old 12-16-2007, 02:24 PM   #20
Blue Crack Distributor
 
VintagePunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In a dry and waterless place
Posts: 55,732
Local Time: 09:34 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by maycocksean


Personally, I'm pretty certain all three posts were "fake" anyway.
Yeah, reading the retort, it seems kinda obvious that the same person probably composed all three of them.
__________________
VintagePunk is offline  
Old 12-16-2007, 03:11 PM   #21
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
Blue Room's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: MICHIGAN, GO BLUE!
Posts: 7,612
Local Time: 09:34 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by VintagePunk


Conversely though, who would want to marry someone who is only interested in your appearance? Superficiality works both ways.

IMO, types like this deserve each other.
Oh, I agree. Both perspectives are ridiculous.

To me, for a relationship to work there does need to be some type of physical attraction between the two people. What that is differs from person to person, relationship to relationship. Does not mean both have to be super models.

Conversely it is nice for both parties to have their crap together. I dont think anyone wants to be with someone who has no job and is living off the streets.

I guess the point is that money and super good looks do not translate to happiness. There just needs to be a deep connection between the two people (however they come to that connection) and an enormous level of trust and honestly. Those are the ingredients to a good relationship IMO.

I agree with everyone else who says these posts are fake though. Makes for interesting conversation though.
__________________
Blue Room is offline  
Old 12-16-2007, 03:59 PM   #22
Blue Crack Distributor
 
VintagePunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In a dry and waterless place
Posts: 55,732
Local Time: 09:34 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Blue Room


Oh, I agree. Both perspectives are ridiculous.

To me, for a relationship to work there does need to be some type of physical attraction between the two people. What that is differs from person to person, relationship to relationship. Does not mean both have to be super models.

Conversely it is nice for both parties to have their crap together. I dont think anyone wants to be with someone who has no job and is living off the streets.

I guess the point is that money and super good looks do not translate to happiness. There just needs to be a deep connection between the two people (however they come to that connection) and an enormous level of trust and honestly. Those are the ingredients to a good relationship IMO.

I agree with everyone else who says these posts are fake though. Makes for interesting conversation though.
Definitely.

Pretty boys don't interest me as a rule.
With me, it's usually that once I get to know someone, a very ordinary, flawed person can become wildly attractive to me because of who they are. I don't see $$'s, either, but you're right, someone with a job and some sense of financial responsibility is good, too. And you're right, BOTH people have to have their shit together.
__________________
VintagePunk is offline  
Old 12-16-2007, 04:08 PM   #23
New Yorker
 
gherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Posts: 2,525
Local Time: 03:34 AM
"My current boyfriend (a trader who lives in Central Park West, of course) and I thoroughly enjoyed discussing your response and we wish you the best of luck in your unhappy pursuit of that elusive market inefficiency." God she's such an idiot.
__________________

__________________
gherman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com