Reggo
Blue Crack Addict
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- Messages
- 26,992
Can we hurry the next ten posts so iYup doesn't kill Cobbler?
I have the next thread waiting in the wings.
cobl04 said:It's a pretty funny video.
Test: ddc7b
bono_212 said:What the hell was that PacMan ghost you just posted, Cobbler?
Imperor said:Perhaps, but you never wax philosophical about what The Carter III means to the black community in a post NWA cultural landscape or whatever buzzword bullshit. That shit bugs the fuck out of me. I'm all for liking hip hop. Lord knows I've come around to much of it in recent years. I can tell you why I think a beat is great or what's a clever turn of phrase. But I'm not going to sit there and act like I can fully appreciate something like "It Was a Good Day." It's not my world.
Obviously this is all my ridiculous opinion, and I'm well aware of how dumb it is. I always had a strange reaction growing up as an upper middle class suburban white kid hanging out with other upper middle class suburban white kids who worshipped Tupac. It just felt weird to me.
cobl04 said:Fucking awesome man congrats
Oh right. Yeah, that annoys me as well. And that is incredibly weird if you look at it: middle class suburban white kid waxing philosophical about hip-hop.
I proselytise, as is painfully obvious, but I hope I've never proclaimed to know hip-hop intimately as if I was part of the movement. I'm just one hell of an appreciator.
Reggo said:Utah's pretty much only rock festival. Not an official poster, though the lineup is correct. I have no interest in going, except maybe to see The Wombats. I can't justify standing around at the Gallivan Center all day just for The Wombats, though.
BigMacPhisto said:. I've done a lot of delving into rock history and have probably listened to more music than almost anybody else on Interference .
Axver said:I don't see why you equate great albums with albums that change the course of music history. I don't give a shit about whether an album was "really revolutionary". On the basis of some of the discussion I've seen on this forum, my opinion may belong in the old unpopular opinions thread, but "impact" or critical consensus is completely irrelevant to how I rate an album or a year; the only thing that matters to me is how good I think an album sounds and how much I want to play the daylights out of it. "Great" is based on the content, not the context. Context may be interesting or rewarding to know, but it doesn't change the content of the disc - and that's what I'm judging. The music that I think is great has largely come out in the last ten or fifteen years. Do I claim (or care if) it has changed the course of any music history? Only the trajectory of my own tastes. But on the basis of that taste, I am happy to agree with anybody who says that there are more great albums coming out now than there were decades ago.
I guess my RYM five star ratings are revealing. I've given 29 albums five stars (I'm stingy, what can I say). Only seven are pre-1990, with the oldest from 1977. The only year to get three five star albums is 1999, and the only years between 1999 and now without a five star album are 2001 and 2011.