Radiohead Discussion Thread

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.

phillyfan26

Blue Crack Supplier
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
30,343
I figure it's been long enough since In Rainbows that it's not really discussing that album specifically anymore. Sorry to disappoint.
 
Every Radiohead song (and Stand Up Comedy) sounds 100% like Slow Dancing.
 
Well, I'm about to listen to No Line for the first time, after which I will answer the question floating around EYKIW: Is it better than In Rainbows? I am nearly certain that the answer will be "no," but, since I have a policy of not posting in EYKIW, I will offer my answer here.
 
Well, I'm about to listen to No Line for the first time, after which I will answer the question floating around EYKIW: Is it better than In Rainbows? I am nearly certain that the answer will be "no," but, since I have a policy of not posting in EYKIW, I will offer my answer here.

I would have to say....

in no universe could NLOTH be considered better than In Rainbows.

But it's a silly comparison that only EYKIW would come up with.
 
No Line is better than In Rainbows... Yes, to me it is.
 
Okay, the verdict for which I am sure you have all been anxiously waiting:

I feel In Rainbows to be a more cohesive, imaginative, and stronger work. That said, I quite enjoyed No Line. I feel that it will only grow with time, much like In Rainbows has and continues to do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom