Hewson said:
This theory can be easily proved ludicrous by looking at one play from that season; Adam Vinatieri's game tying 45 yard field goal through a driiving snow against the raiders. There is no way the refs/NFL/GW Bush or Saint Bono could have put the fix in enough to make that kick good. Its the most clutch kick in NFL history considering the conditions and situation, and nobody could have fixed that aspect of the game.
yes but we all know about the tuck, which gave them the opportunity for the win.
now while i dont really think there was any sort of fixing going on in the superbowl, there is about 1% of me that there is a possibility that the head official, Bernie Kukar was in on something.
If he wasn't, then he is an extremely incompotent ref who missed a few very obvious calls.
He is the guy that is supposed to watch the infractions against the QB. In the play where Warner was intercepted for a touchdown, there was an obvious, verrry obvious blow to Warner's head. This should have resulted in a roughing the passer and given the Rams a first down, but it didn't and the Pats got a TD out of it. huge missed call.
http://www.stlouisrams.net/download/vrab_war.wmv
the second, unbelievably bad call was on the last drive of the game that won it for the Pats. With just 33 seconds left, there was an obvious intentional grounding that wasn't called. this would have pretty much been a drive killer and sent the game into overtime. once again it was kukar who was supposed to make the call, did he miss it because he is incompotent, or for another reason?
http://stlouisrams.net/xxxvi/clips/release2.wmv
when brady released the ball he was obviously not outside the pocket. huge missed call.
another curious thing is, when the rams did get a right call in their favor, the holding against the patriots when they had picked up that fumble for a TD, Bernie Kukar spent 5 minutes trying to convince the ref who threw the flag to pick it up. The call was pretty obvious, so why would Kukar spend so much time trying to overturn it?
here is the blatant hold (more like tackle)
http://stlouisrams.net/xxxvi/clips/015.wmv
and here is kukar doing his best to overturn it
http://stlouisrams.net/xxxvi/clips/refs.wmv
thankfully someone on the staff had a sense of integrity
McGinest again: "The coaches told me to be aggressive. They told me to hit Faulk and they told me to hold him. Hey, sometimes you get caught."
Head Referee Bernie Kukar: QUESTION: "Was there any call in this Super Bowl that you wish you could have had back?"
Kukar: "Absolutely not. The only play was the holding penalty after the Rams quarterback fumbled the ball and the Patriots ran it backs 99 yards for a touchdown; "I certainly tried to talk the head linesman out of that penalty. I gave him every opportunity to back off but he held fast. He was convinced it was a hold and I kept hammering him. However, I did see it on television last night on the replay and it was definitely a hold. It was a good call."
there is about 4 or 5 other plays that are quite questionable as well, (like how they let the clock run out after the last field goal when there should have been 2 seconds left
http://stlouisrams.net/xxxvi/clips/020.wmv ), but these are the three that makes me think that maaaaaaaaaaaaaybe something was going on with Kukar.