NFL 2007 Part 3 - Page 51 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Lemonade Stand > Lemonade Stand Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-31-2007, 01:08 PM   #751
Blue Crack Distributor
 
corianderstem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 63,730
Local Time: 11:32 AM
A potential Seattle vs. Green Bay? Oh dear. Divided loyalties for the LOSE.

Thanks for the info, guys. I knew ya'll could help me out.
__________________

__________________
corianderstem is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:10 PM   #752
The Male
 
LemonMelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hollywoo
Posts: 65,810
Local Time: 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoManiac


If the Seahawks beat the Redskins, then they, as the third seed, will play the second-seeded Packers. The Cowboys will then play either the fourth-seeded Bucs or fifth-seeded Giants.
OK, nevermind, you're right. The games aren't the deciding factor, but the seeding.
__________________

__________________


Now.
LemonMelon is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:11 PM   #753
Refugee
 
SeattleVertigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Islamabad, Pakistan
Posts: 1,567
Local Time: 12:32 AM
Green Bay oughta destroy Seattle this year. <grin>

Especially with home field.
__________________
SeattleVertigo is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:12 PM   #754
Blue Crack Distributor
 
corianderstem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 63,730
Local Time: 11:32 AM
I'm glad I won't be watching any Packers games with my mom. She gets way too mad when they do something wrong ... even when they're winning!
__________________
corianderstem is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:12 PM   #755
The Male
 
LemonMelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hollywoo
Posts: 65,810
Local Time: 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by SeattleVertigo
Green Bay oughta destroy Seattle this year. <grin>

Especially with home field.
Pretty much any team currently in the playoffs could destroy Seattle. They simply aren't very good. Or, at least, they're good when they're playing the Rams.
__________________


Now.
LemonMelon is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:15 PM   #756
Blue Crack Addict
 
Hewson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your own private Idaho
Posts: 26,492
Local Time: 02:32 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by LemonMelon


Redskins' opponents

142-107

Seahawks' opponents

106-143

Next time, when your natural reflex tells you to bash the Skins, think before you go ahead and type it out.
I responded to your exact criticism of the Seabags, only beating one winning team. The Skins beat 2, and had Dallas needed the game yesterday we don't know how they would have played. Next time your natural reflex is to get defensive, read what is written and understand its exact purpose.
__________________
Hewson is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:16 PM   #757
Refugee
 
SeattleVertigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Islamabad, Pakistan
Posts: 1,567
Local Time: 12:32 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by LemonMelon


Pretty much any team currently in the playoffs could destroy Seattle. They simply aren't very good. Or, at least, they're good when they're playing the Rams.
Yeah, but one thing to learn is to always respect your competition. That way you won't feel so bad when the Redskins are beaten silly in Seattle.

I tease.

But as a Patriots fan, I'll respect any team that they play against in the playoffs. Nothing's a given. Everything has to be worked for.
__________________
SeattleVertigo is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:17 PM   #758
The Male
 
LemonMelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hollywoo
Posts: 65,810
Local Time: 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Hewson
I responded to your exact criticism of the Seabags, only beating one winning team. The Skins beat 2, and had Dallas needed the game yesterday we don't know how they would have played. Next time your natural reflex is to get defensive, read what is written and understand its exact purpose.
I just find it amusing that any time I have a point to make, you make it your mission to refute it as quickly and efficiently as possible. How about this.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/nfl07.htm

Based on records, net points, strength of schedule, etc, Skins are ranked #8 overall (with 2nd most difficult schedule), while the Seachickens are ranked #15 (easiest schedule in the league). They're still 10-6 though, and are tough at home. I'm just not quivering in fear or anything.
__________________


Now.
LemonMelon is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:19 PM   #759
Self-righteous bullshitter
 
BoMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Soviet Canuckistan — Socialist paradise
Posts: 16,666
Local Time: 03:32 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by LemonMelon
They simply aren't very good. Or, at least, they're good when they're playing the Rams.
Or the 49ers.
__________________

BoMac is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:40 PM   #760
Blue Crack Addict
 
Hewson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your own private Idaho
Posts: 26,492
Local Time: 02:32 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by LemonMelon


I just find it amusing that any time I have a point to make, you make it your mission to refute it as quickly and efficiently as possible.
I think you're getting a complex. I responded to you on 2 things here recently, yesterday to you antagonistic post about Pats' fans believeing cheating is a religion, and today I simply put up the other side of the coin to your stat about the Seahags having beaten only 1 winning team. I'm sorry if it bothered you that the Skins aren't much better in that department, I wasn't attacking you or your Redskins, in fact as you'll see I called it "advantage even" which actually would bode well for the road team.

So in hindsight I responded to your attack on the fans of the Pats of which I'm one, and presented a statistical viewpoint to match up with one you had posted, which was merely a discussion of the upcoming game, had the 2 teams involved been the Bucs and Giants and all else was the same, I'd have posted the same reponse.

Plus yesterday I said this to you:
Quote:
Originally posted by Hewson

Good luck to your team next week...Todd Collins has been quite a nice story.
Whatever, carry on.
__________________
Hewson is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:47 PM   #761
Blue Crack Supplier
 
No spoken words's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Where do YOU live?
Posts: 43,241
Local Time: 11:32 AM
Hewson.

LemonMelon.

Please hug. Don't end up like this:

__________________
No spoken words is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:47 PM   #762
Blue Crack Distributor
 
corianderstem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 63,730
Local Time: 11:32 AM
Oh my god!
__________________
corianderstem is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:50 PM   #763
Blue Crack Supplier
 
No spoken words's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Where do YOU live?
Posts: 43,241
Local Time: 11:32 AM
For the record, that's me on the left, and Uberbeaver aka M'Lord Douche on the right.
__________________
No spoken words is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:51 PM   #764
Blue Crack Distributor
 
corianderstem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 63,730
Local Time: 11:32 AM
I recognized you and assumed that was Beav on the right, but I don't think I've ever seen a picture of him.
__________________
corianderstem is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:51 PM   #765
The Male
 
LemonMelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hollywoo
Posts: 65,810
Local Time: 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Hewson
I think you're getting a complex. I responded to you on 2 things here recently, yesterday to you antagonistic post about Pats' fans believeing cheating is a religion, and today I simply put up the other side of the coin to your stat about the Seahags having beaten only 1 winning team. I'm sorry if it bothered you that the Skins aren't much better in that department, I wasn't attacking you or your Redskins, in fact as you'll see I called it "advantage even" which actually would bode well for the road team.

So in hindsight I responded to your attack on the fans of the Pats of which I'm one, and presented a statistical viewpoint to match up with one you had posted, which was merely a discussion of the upcoming game, had the 2 teams involved been the Bucs and Giants and all else was the same, I'd have posted the same reponse.

Plus yesterday I said this to you:


Whatever, carry on.
Of course, you avoid the fact that we've been having it out all season long, culminating in what has transpired here over the past couple of days. This isn't really new. If we're discussing complexes, who's the one who went off and started talking trash because I made one sarcastic comment concerning the Patriots' fanbase? Who's the one who couldn't deal with me poking fun at Bilichick's pre-Brady record? We've both been at fault, I guess. If you really weren't being antagonistic, I'm sorry.
__________________

__________________


Now.
LemonMelon is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com