Forbes- Movie Stars Who Deliver The Best Bang For The Buck - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Lemonade Stand > Lemonade Stand Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 08-07-2007, 08:51 AM   #1
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,984
Local Time: 05:58 AM
Forbes- Movie Stars Who Deliver The Best Bang For The Buck

Special Report
Ultimate Star Payback
Dorothy Pomerantz, 08.06.07

Hollywood studios routinely shell out $20 million paychecks and serve up rich percentages of a film's revenue to A list stars like Will Smith, Tom Cruise and Johnny Depp on the premise that their famous faces ensure packed movie houses around the world on opening weekend.

But are these superstars worth it?

According to Forbes' first-ever list of Ultimate Star Payback, the movie stars who deliver the best bang for the buck aren't the industry's top earners. Matt Damon, the soft-spoken leading man in box office winner The Bourne Ultimatum, turns out to be Hollywood's best investment. For every dollar Damon got paid for his last three roles, his films returned $29 of gross income. And, surprisingly, former Friends star Jennifer Aniston is Hollywood's most profitable actress, despite duds like Rumor Has It. For ever dollar the former Mrs. Pitt was paid for her last three major roles, her films on average returned $17 of gross income.

The first step in calculating our payback figures required adding up the film's worldwide box office and U.S. DVD revenues. We then subtracted the budget (which includes the up-front compensation for actors) for each film to derive net revenue.

Next, to calculate gross income, the actor's total compensation was divided into net revenue. The gross income for the last three movies for each actor was averaged to calculate his or her ultimate payback. We deliberately used gross income rather than net income in our analysis because the former is a better measure of a movie star's ability to generate income for a film.

Movie studios are famous for their accounting creativity. The further down the profit and loss statement you travel, the more room for chicanery. While there is little debate over a film's budget, marketing expenses are treated differently for almost every movie.

In Tinseltown, a film must be able to recover its production budget to be considered a box office success. The only film on the list that didn't recover its costs at all was Gigli (2003) starring Jennifer Lopez, which reportedly cost $54 million to make but barely earned a fraction of that at the box office and on video.

Damon earned the top spot mainly through his work playing an amnesiac spy in the Bourne trilogy. In 2004 Universal Studios made The Bourne Supremacy for $75 million--downright cheap for a summer action flick--and grossed $290 million in worldwide box office, plus another $165 million in video sales and rentals. Damon's total compensation for that film was just $26 million, a bargain for Universal. The latest installment, The Bourne Ultimatum, opened in theaters this past weekend with $70.2 million in box office receipts in the U.S., the biggest August opening weekend ever.

Screen heartthrob Brad Pitt seized second place, thanks in good measure to his enormous appeal overseas. Mr. and Mrs. Smith, for example, co-starring his current real-life love interest Angelina Jolie, grossed $186 million stateside. The 2004 Trojan War epic Troy made $133 million in U.S. box office receipts. It nearly tripled that abroad.

Tying for third place are Johnny Depp and Vince Vaughn. Depp, who earns $20 million per picture, has logged some $2.2 billion at the box office for his last three films. Vaughn's going rate has been roughly half that. But Vaughn's last trio of movies--The Break-Up, Wedding Crashers, Dodgeball--have been box office bonanzas relative to their low production costs. (At $52 million, The Break-Up's budget was roughly 20% of Dead Man's Chest.)

Aniston is the actress with the highest Star Payback. Despite swipes from the critics, her generally low-budget films grossed on average $17 for every $1 she was paid. Aniston's standing was buoyed by her role in The Break-Up, which banked an estimated $270 million in worldwide box office and video.

In terms of their returns to Hollywood studios, Vaughn and Aniston eclipse most of their $20 million per film colleagues in Hollywood. Movies starring Tom Hanks, Tom Cruise and Will Smith average roughly $12 in gross income per salary dollar.

The biggest disappointers are Hollywood's coterie of top-earning funnymen-- Adam Sandler (at $9) and Will Ferrell and Jim Carrey ($8 each)--who rank near the bottom of the list. One reason: American comedies don't translate as well as action flicks to foreign audiences. Ferrell's Talladega Nights, for example, did just $15 million overseas, versus $148 million at the domestic box office.

Their films are also increasingly pricey affairs--in part because they are so well compensated--setting the bar excruciatingly high for a bona fide hit. Last year, Sandler headlined Click, which cost $83 million, while Carrey's Fun With Dick and Jane (2005) had a reported budget of $100 million. Compare that with lower-budget blockbuster comedies like The Wedding Crashers ($40 million), The 40-Year-Old-Virgin ($26 million), and Borat ($18 million).

At the very bottom of our list is Russell Crowe, whose standing in Hollywood has shrunk since he scored back-to-back consecutive Oscar nods for The Insider (1999), Gladiator (2000) and A Beautiful Mind (2001). Crowe's last three films earned on average just $5 in gross income for every dollar spent on the star. His most recent, last year's A Good Year, was made for $35 million, almost one-third of which went to Crowe's salary. The film earned only $40 million in worldwide box office, making it a huge disappointment for Fox, which produced and distributed it.

In pictures
http://www.forbes.com/2007/08/03/cel...hisSpeed=30000
__________________

__________________
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 09:45 AM   #2
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
MrPryck2U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Long Island, NY, USA, Earth
Posts: 8,952
Local Time: 05:58 AM

Fuck Tom Cruise! His last several films have been absolute shit!
Johnny Depp and Tom Hanks are the only actors out there doing anything with substance.
Just because a movie does well at the box office, doesn't mean its any good. Look at the shit that comes out every Summer.
__________________

__________________
MrPryck2U is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 11:58 AM   #3
LMP
Blue Crack Supplier
 
LMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 37,609
Local Time: 04:58 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by MrPryck2U
Fuck Tom Cruise! His last several films have been absolute shit!
Johnny Depp and Tom Hanks are the only actors out there doing anything with substance.
Just because a movie does well at the box office, doesn't mean its any good. Look at the shit that comes out every Summer.
The Pirates sequels were real substance indeed. Denzel Washington's sure done some crap the last few years, that Man on Fire... what a crapfest.
__________________
LMP is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 12:14 PM   #4
Blue Crack Addict
 
Lancemc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ba Sing Se
Posts: 17,664
Local Time: 06:58 AM
While I agree that an actor's "bang for the buck" should also factor in the quality of the performance, it's a pretty fucking stupid thing to say only two A-list actors (I'm adding the "A-list" prefix, because otherwise MrPryck's statement is an utter clusterfuck) are doing anything with substance, let alone go on to include Johnny Depp as one of those actors.
__________________
Lancemc is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 12:55 PM   #5
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,984
Local Time: 05:58 AM
It's Forbes, not Entertainment Weekly -it is about the ratio of pay to movie grosses and the film budget, not quality of performance or the films.
__________________
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 01:24 PM   #6
LMP
Blue Crack Supplier
 
LMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 37,609
Local Time: 04:58 AM
which is explains why Jennifer Aniston is so high up on the list.
__________________
LMP is offline  
Old 08-07-2007, 01:24 PM   #7
Blue Crack Addict
 
Lancemc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ba Sing Se
Posts: 17,664
Local Time: 06:58 AM
I understand, as that was obviously what the article was talking about. It's also pretty pointless to, considering what a small part of a film's success one actor plays.
__________________

__________________
Lancemc is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com