email. - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Lemonade Stand > Lemonade Stand Archive
Click Here to Login
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-28-2002, 02:16 PM   #1
Rock n' Roll Doggie
kobayashi's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: the ether
Posts: 5,142
Local Time: 08:24 AM

just imagine what the cost analysis would be for lost $'s due to interference usage throughout the world. it is likely substantial.
from the national post
Workplace e-mails costing firms millions
New UWO survey
Odile Nelson
National Post

Wednesday, June 26, 2002
Workplace e-mail costs corporations millions of dollars every year in lost productivity, according to a study released yesterday by the University of Western Ontario.
Email in the Workplace: A Productivity Study surveyed the e-mailing habits and attitudes of Canadian and U.S. managers and employees.
It concluded that the current volume of irrelevant or trivial office e-mails has turned the communications tool into a time-consuming obligation for many employees.
The study found that the average employee now replies to 48 e-mails a day, compared with 36 in 2000; the percentage of respondents receiving 50 or more e-mails per day swelled from 19% last year to 37% this year and nearly 50% of this increase can be attributed to non-work related e-mails.
Only 17% of the respondents said they can answer all their emails on the same work day and most must spend an extra six hours a week managing their inboxes.
Christina Cavanagh, the author and a professor of management communications at the university's business school, said the study shows e-mail has not fulfilled its promise of improving productivity.
"I use a Marshall Mcluhan phrase he said in 1964, 'We shape the tools and they in turn shape us.' We use email for all its benefits but we abdicated our role in managing it as a productivity tool. We're getting wrapped up in this lock of 'I better manage my emails' but you know if 50% of e-mails offer nothing to the bottom line that's where the corporate costs come in."
The study, which surveyed 57 managers and employees, calculates that if the average employee makes $70,000 a year and the average firm has 100 staff, the extra six hours a week they spend on e-mail means at least a $1,000,000 a year loss in productivity.
But Professor Cavanagh says the growth in these low-value emails stems not from spam or junk mail but an increase in inter-office e-mail and employees over-use of the "reply to all" and "cc" functions. Employees tend to indiscriminately use e-mail to keep all their fellow staff members informed on any given subject - whether or not the information is relevant or necessary.
"The reply to all and endless stream of CC's is a big deal," said David Tait, a vice-president at the consulting firm of A.T. Kearney in Toronto. "What I don't like is when I see one reply to all message sent out over a certain issue and then everyone replies [using the function] so the issue doesn't disappear."
Copyright 2002 National Post

im the candyman. and the candyman is back.
kobayashi is offline  
Old 06-28-2002, 02:18 PM   #2
love, blood, life
JessicaAnn's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI (USA)
Posts: 11,743
Local Time: 07:24 AM

I don't think my calculator can handle that computation.

JessicaAnn is offline  
Old 06-28-2002, 02:21 PM   #3
Rock n' Roll Doggie
sulawesigirl4's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,416
Local Time: 07:24 AM

omg, kobesan, I was JUST thinking about this yesterday and was going to post a thread on it. How much does interference contribute to a loss of productivity worldwide! *wonders if a $$ estimate could be made*
"I can't change the world, but I can change the world in me." - Bono

sulawesigirl4 is offline  
Old 06-28-2002, 03:03 PM   #4
Rock n' Roll Doggie
kobayashi's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: the ether
Posts: 5,142
Local Time: 08:24 AM
average number of posts, average time to type a post, average number of posts emanating from a work address, average salary of an interferencer, average time spent browsing interference in total...i know i'm missing some variables...
ahhh screw this i'm going camping
im the candyman. and the candyman is back.
kobayashi is offline  
Old 06-28-2002, 03:16 PM   #5
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Lilly's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: back and to the left
Posts: 8,523
Local Time: 06:24 AM
Originally posted by kobayashi
i'm going camping
but when you come back you'll want to post double time to make up for your time me, i did the same thing.
Lilly is offline  
Old 06-28-2002, 05:00 PM   #6
you are what you is
Salome's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 22,019
Local Time: 02:24 PM
the little time I spent browsing Interference at work I wouldn't be productive anyway
it's either browsing the forum or looking out my window
“Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.”
~Frank Zappa
Salome is offline  
Old 06-28-2002, 06:03 PM   #7
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ghetofabu's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Kitchen
Posts: 4,038
Local Time: 06:24 AM
That is thought provoking.

ghetofabu is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright ©