Cindy Crawford's 5 year-old daughter poses for swimsuit catalog - Page 3 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Lemonade Stand > Lemonade Stand Archive
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-19-2006, 07:53 AM   #31
Blue Crack Addict
Laura M's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 18,932
Local Time: 02:50 AM
Originally posted by Angela Harlem
i think both photos are repulsive. there's something wrong with the second one which is not as obvious as the first.
The thing about the second one for me is the outfit she is wearing. It's totally wrong.

Laura M is offline  
Old 09-19-2006, 01:57 PM   #32
Rock n' Roll Doggie
U2Girl416's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: and if you don't know where you're going...any road will take you there..
Posts: 3,435
Local Time: 08:50 PM
I suppose for me what I find disturbing is not only the poses but also that I'm nearly desensitized to it in the sense of well, what else is next? There don't seem to be any lines or limits these days, especially with celebrities. It's like nothing is a surprise anymore. What a beautiful little girl and she probably has no idea what the rest of us see when we look at a picture like that.

U2Girl416 is offline  
Old 09-24-2006, 09:12 PM   #33
Blue Crack Addict
MissVelvetDress_75's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: basking in my post-concert glow still mesmerized by the orbit of his hips..Also Holding Bono Close as he requested.
Posts: 25,776
Local Time: 09:50 PM
[q]Crawford's Kid Controversy

Supermodel Cindy Crawford has caused controversy by allowing her 5-year-old daughter to model a new swimwear line.

Kaya, Crawford's daughter with Rande Gerber, poses topless and in a string bikini, showing off a tattoo on her lower back in the ads for Melissa Odabash beachwear.

Odabash has been inundated with so much criticism, the company has removed the pictures of Kaya from its Web site.

Spokesperson Roberta Correia says, "We've gotten calls from all over the place. Unfortunately, we are not able to release any of the pictures or info on the Melissa Odabash shoot. The pictures are actually no longer going to be on the Web site."

But Crawford's representative insists the issue has been blown out of proportion, telling Page Six, "Oh my God, that's ridiculous. It's a stick-on tattoo."

She even claimed the pictures weren't meant to be used in ads, adding, "Cindy's friends own this company. It was just a fun little photo shoot they did in Malibu one day. Kaya is not modeling."[/q]
MissVelvetDress_75 is offline  
Old 09-25-2006, 01:54 PM   #34
Rock n' Roll Doggie
JanuaryStar's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: World of Dreams
Posts: 9,159
Local Time: 03:50 AM
This is so wrong... That girl is beautiful but taken out of context so badly
JanuaryStar is offline  
Old 09-25-2006, 02:58 PM   #35
Blue Crack Distributor
corianderstem's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 61,547
Local Time: 06:50 PM
Uh, Cindy? It wasn't about the tattoo. We kind of figured it was fake.
corianderstem is offline  
Old 09-25-2006, 05:25 PM   #36
War Child
2morrow's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Under an atomic BOOM-CHA!
Posts: 684
Local Time: 07:50 PM
So wrong. Just because the tattoo is fake does'nt make the concept much less disturbing...and so what if it was'nt an official modeling shoot...she knew the pics would be posted online for all to see. Is that any different from publishing them in a magazine? Do celebrities not have a sense of self-respect/privacy anymore?
2morrow is offline  
Old 09-25-2006, 09:37 PM   #37
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Pearl's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,624
Local Time: 09:50 PM
Sometimes I think celebrities live in their own dimension, in their own reality. Another reason why those pictures are disturbing is not only because of their content, but they seem exploitive. As in, Cindy was exploiting her own daughter to...I don't know, gain publicity, put her daughter in the same business so she would be like mommy, or help a friend out. Its just disturbing knowing that Cindy was allowing her to pose like that and think nothing much of it, and then she comes up with that defense as if ordinary people don't know what they're talking about.

Pearl is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright ©