Originally posted by IvanClaytonJnr:
Story isn't worth a cent . It's Olympics
This whole ''play'' makes me laugh , aaaaahh what great words from this canadian pair , they even can't win in a fair fight , so they did by scandal , fookin loosers
what a great event , i'm sure soon , there will be another stupid shitty hollywood blockbuster about this case , oh year , such a tragedy .
Ivan, normally I attempt to refrain from replying to messages as short-sighted and stupid as this. The people in this forum desrve better than that.
But occasionally, I get so fustrated that I decided to reply anyway, in vain attempt to reconcile your stubborn, pig-headed comments.
Clearly, you did not watch the skate in question. Either that, or you just don't understand figure skating at all. Or you're some huge Russian activist, hoping to tarnish the already-tained gold. Or you're bored an you want to piss off a lot of people here. Any of the above is sad. I feel sorry for you, really. Anyone who prides himself on diagreeing with others, or is too filled with egotisitcal pride--so much so that he cannot even see the truth--deserves all the sympathy in the world.
I've skated--I know technical ability. I've danced--I understand artistic impression. I've watched skating for 19 years, both live and on televsion. I know what a gold medal performance looks like. So do many other people in this forum who have attested to this. The Canadians had it. Their program was not only technically superior, but artistically superb.
It can be arugued that the Russians may have had an edge in artistry, what with their balletic, arm-waving, flowy costume and classical music influence. The Canadians had a more North-American, emotional, no-frills, nouveau, different type of artistic appeal. It really comes down to personal preference. The Canadians skated to a more original program however (the past 11 Russian winners have skated the same type of flowy, showy, blah, undynamic performances that judges eat up) with more passion and chemistry than that of their Russian counterparts.
In sheer athletics, Anton Sikharulidze slipped out of a double axel. Elena Berezhnaya landed incorreectly on a throw. Both are worth mandatory deductions.
Yet, the Russian, French, and Ukrainian judges awarded the same technical marks to both the Russians and Canadians (5.8), although the Canadians were rock-solid in their technical abilites. Their throws were perfect; they landed every jump. The death spiral was stunning. Clean, deep edges, no stumbles.
This alone proves block judging. How can one team perform the elemts perfectly and receive the same marks as a group that was sub-par?
From the Russian and Ukraianian judges this comes as no surprise. To vote for one's country, or along similar politcal lines is not an uncommon thing in this sport. However, it is a major problem that has plagued the figure skating world for years and should be addressed immediately.
The French judge publically admitted that she had been pressured by the Russians to vote along those lines, so as to trade favor in the ice dance (in turn, the Russian judge will vote the French ice dancers first). Has she marked fairly and awarded the marks desrved, both technically and artistically, she would have been the single judge that tipped the scale.
The Canadians, in a press conference, publically apologized to all athletes that have not received the attention that they deserve, due to the figure skating story. They are gracious, not sore losers. They only want to be judged fairly. Had they legitimately been worse, I'm sure we would not have heard these comments, nor would there be controversy. The problem is that even the International Figure Skating Association has noticed that the Candadians were better.
The Russians themselves are not to blame. In theory, I suppose they should give up their medals, acknowledge they were second best. However, this will not happen. Put yourselves in their skates. It must be rough.
Then put yourself in the Canadian's skates. Knowing that you skated a perfect performance, with as much conviction and passion that you coiuld muster. A program, which, on a number of occassions, has earned 6.0s for artistic impression. A program which won the crowd and hearts of all those watching in Salt Lake that night...
Except three judges who had predetermined the fates. Imagine knowing that your best would never matter, because you had already lost before the competition had begun. What should you do? Take the low road and not try? Or take the high road and show off a gold-medal worthy performance?
As anitram stated above, it doesn't matter how many times you've done the program. Or when it was conceived. The spirit of the Olympics is in how well you perform ON THAT NIGHT. Your warm up doesn't matter, nor does you practices before. Past performances? Blarg. Judges are to mark exactly what they see in front of them, as it is. If judges marked based on the past, I'm sure we would see the Russians Skating Federation complaining that Berezhnaya and Sikharulidze performed wonderfully at Nationals, or at the beginning of the season, blah blah blah.
As David Pelltier stated, "This isn't about me and him (Anton). Or us and them. This is about getting judged fairly."
This wasn't a 'fair' fight Ivan. It was a farce, and a slap in the face to the Canadians. I find it hard to believe that you can't see that.
[This message has been edited by The_Sweetest_Thing (edited 02-16-2002).]