Michael Griffiths
Rock n' Roll Doggie
The CFL offers a more entertaining, faster brand of football. Even the ex-NFL players in the CFL say the same thing.
Michael Griffiths said:The CFL offers a more entertaining, faster brand of football. Even the ex-NFL players in the CFL say the same thing.
Since Canadians have the advantage of being able to watch both leagues on a regular basis, I think we would have the better vantage point, no?Chizip said:
just when i think you cant make anymore of a fool of yourself, you say something like this and totally outdo yourself!
1. I did not say the CFL was more entertaining because we can watch it. I said we have a better idea than the US as to how entertaining it is in relation to the NFL, because we can watch both, and because you (the US) generally cannot. Curling being on TV has no more relevance in this discussion than dart throwing being shown on ESPN does.Chizip said:well since you can watch curling i guess that makes it better than the nfl too huh?
so how mnay people watch the cfl championship? if its really more entertaining wouldnt more people watch that?
the arena football league is much faster and higher scroing than the nfl as well, does that make it more entertaining? of course not.
I wasn't talking about the entire world. I was talking about people who watch in Canada. Also, ridiculously more people have TV access to the NFL than the do to the CFL outside of Canada, so it's quite ridiculous to even be comparing world viewership. The US market, just like in everything else, is exponentially larger than the Canadian market. Even you know this, Chiz... at least I hope.Chizip said:i did some research and the largest audience that has watched a grey cup has been a little over 8 million. the largest superbowl audience was around 140 million. now why would many many many people from around the world watch something that was less interesting?
the cfl is like the minor leagues for the nfl, see doug flutie. a star in the cfl who couldnt een hold down a starting job in the nfl. but hey, if you like watching less talented player then i guess thats your thing, now i know why you are a canucks fan .
"entertainment" is more a matter of opinion than fact, so we can agree to disagree, but i think you're in the very small minority on this one.
Going by that logic, we can swiftly assertain NHL hockey in the 80s was boring compared to today's great trap game of the new millenium, because there was very little access to it outside of Canada back then. Interesting...Chizip said:and why does the rest of the world not have access? because its not entertaining and nobody would watch it.
Chizip said:and why does the rest of the world not have access? because its not entertaining and nobody would watch it.