Originally posted by Bono's American Wife:
I would like A & F to go on record and explain exactly what "wink wink" is supposed to mean when placed on an 8 year old girls crotch. And who would consider a little girl "eye candy"? And I don't even want to get into what the ones with the cherries is supposed to mean.
This is just more sick sexualization of little girls.
There is no logical reasoning for this. Thongs normally serve one of 2 purposes, either to eliminate panty lines or to make your ass look good for your man. Which of these would an 8 year old need them for?
Originally posted by 404 Not Found:
The company focuses on providing high-quality merchandise
very disturbing indeedOriginally posted by Bono's American Wife:
There is no logical reasoning for this. Thongs normally serve one of 2 purposes, either to eliminate panty lines or to make your ass look good for your man. Which of these would an 8 year old need them for?
Originally posted by ~unforgettableFOXfire~:
Summaritively...
Anyone else want to question me about my answers?
Originally posted by HeartlandGirl:
First, summaratively is not a word.
And by what you've written about anyone else questioning your answers, I feel that you believe you've put me in my place. I strongly disagree, and I stand by my statements that most little kids (I'm talking kids before puberty) don't know what thongs are and don't buy their own underpants.
Originally posted by ~unforgettableFOXfire~:
I wont contest the fact that most kids dont, I wont even contest the fact that most intelligent parents out there wouldnt buy something like that for their kid, but, there are people who would. Youd be suprised what kids know nowadays, youd be suprised by the insolence that some of them exhibit...
Originally posted by melon:
So tell me why it is our responsibility to tell parents what they can or cannot buy for their children can wear? This is a product that will either sink or swim on sheer economics. Most parents will not buy these for their children, so, by sheer economics, this should be a failure that will go away. However, if it isn't a failure, that means that parents are buying these for their children, and that is their full right to do so, no matter how repugnant you or I might find them to be.
I guess I find myself disturbed over "moral crusades" these days.
Melon
Originally posted by melon:
So tell me why it is our responsibility to tell parents what they can or cannot buy for their children can wear? This is a product that will either sink or swim on sheer economics. Most parents will not buy these for their children, so, by sheer economics, this should be a failure that will go away. However, if it isn't a failure, that means that parents are buying these for their children, and that is their full right to do so, no matter how repugnant you or I might find them to be.
I guess I find myself disturbed over "moral crusades" these days.
Originally posted by melon:
sheer economics. by sheer economics,
Originally posted by BEAL:
I love thongs like any guy, in fact my g/f wears nothing but(she's 25...lucky me)
Originally posted by Lilly:
lilly's bio fact du jour:
wearing thongs causes yeast infections.
Originally posted by speedracer:
I'd have felt a lot better if I could have gone to my grave not knowing that.
Originally posted by Lilly:
lilly's bio fact du jour:
wearing thongs causes yeast infections.