NHChris
The Fly
I think the thing that makes these outdoor gigs expensive is the labor and transportation costs. We're talking about a whole bunch of 18-wheelers and the diesel to feed them, plus the set-up and tear-down labor in what likely will be high-labor-cost cities. It therefore might be sensible for U2 to set the staging up and let it ride for 2 or 3 nights.
One might wonder whether Foxboro could host three successful U2 concerts at 72,000 (I'm counting the field tickets) each. But factor in Southwest Airlines and the effect they can have in getting fans from Point A to Point B. No longer is it strictly the Boston market that needs to absorb 216,000 tickets...it's any other city that is within Southwest Airlines' reach to get them to Providence or Manchester. Or JetBlue to Boston.
Anyway, if U2 wants to avoid another outdoor loss in the States, they'll need to optimize the transportation and labor costs by playing 'smart:' Fewer cities, but well-chosen ones; and multiple dates in those cities.
Chris in NH
One might wonder whether Foxboro could host three successful U2 concerts at 72,000 (I'm counting the field tickets) each. But factor in Southwest Airlines and the effect they can have in getting fans from Point A to Point B. No longer is it strictly the Boston market that needs to absorb 216,000 tickets...it's any other city that is within Southwest Airlines' reach to get them to Providence or Manchester. Or JetBlue to Boston.
Anyway, if U2 wants to avoid another outdoor loss in the States, they'll need to optimize the transportation and labor costs by playing 'smart:' Fewer cities, but well-chosen ones; and multiple dates in those cities.
Chris in NH
Last edited: