Miricale_Drug said:why do people always slate the setlist on the chicago dvd? it is an accurate represenation of Leg1 vertigo, which is what a dvd should do
but people are still complaing about the setlist on the third leg, so no matter what show they filmed, or what setlist they used, there would always be the ones that wouldnt like it etc, and thats not the fans fault, but its also not the bands fault, they do what they can to please everybodyfrozenmuze04 said:
But I think they recorded the DVD WAY too early in the tour to rush it out for a Christmas release. They hadn't even gotten into the rhythm of how great the setlist grew to be by the third leg. It's representative of the first leg, but I don't think it's very representative of the whole tour. They shouldn't have filmed until the third leg.
Go said:theu2fly:
take a look at my pictures from Milan:
flickr.com/photos/43737272@N00/
Pix were taken both by me (second row, right of the stage) and my friends (nosebleed section).
Then again, this might be the wrong thread....
U2Man said:
Why doesn't the GA look fully packed?
Only the first 45 minutes of the first night weren't recorded properly, the second night is shot perfectly.Roland of Gilead said:Holy Mother of God! That Vertigo video was the best!
I got the luck of the Irish today with U2.Communication showing up in my mailbox on the last possible mail day before Christmas. Like it was meant to be.
I heard/read that Milan was not entirely recorded for DVD due to a power failure in the first 30 minutes of the show. Any truth to this? Were both Milan dates recorded by the DVD crew?
I pray that we won't have to wait 2 years to get this Milan show released like with Slane's release happening 2 years later.
OpperGoeroe said:
Only the first 45 minutes of the first night weren't recorded properly, the second night is shot perfectly.