Could Dallas have replaced The Edge if there had been only a couple dates left?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
When Edge's space ship came to the north side of Dublin it was playing that tune." He waved in the air to indicate the notes still chiming. "Adam, Larry and myself watched his space ship landing. Edge walked out and Larry said, 'Where are you from?' and Edge said, 'I'm from the future.' Adam asked, 'What's it like?' and Edge said, 'It's better.'"
-enough said
 
if I had tickets to a u2 show and heard Edge wasn't playing lead guitars, I would sell my tickets the same day.

for face value of course :wink:
 
usamilo said:


Maybe the question I was really asking was what happens when the unthinkable finally happens? A disagreement, a reevaluation of life’s priorities or a sudden and tragic death spells the end of U2 as we have known it for these many wonderful years. Would I want the band to end like The Beatles leaving us with only the memories of them together? Or would I want them to continue like REM or The Who with an altered lineup that stills brings enjoyment, but pales when I think of them alongside of the original?

If the unthinkable were to happen and Edge dies and the other three decide to carry one in his honor I could live with that as long as the music stays relevant and any new CD doesn't become an excuse to go an a greatest hits tour. I'd also hope that any replacement wouldn't be an Edge clone but be allowed to be his own man. I'd also hope that U2 fans would be willing to give any new member a chance.
 
Just to chime in, I seem to like making either silly or angry posts.

WTF is up with this thread? Having Dallas stand in for Edge? I'm sorry, if Bono were incapacitated and couldn't play a gig, would you seriously consider having someone stand in for him? He can't be replaced, and neither can Edge.

Like it or not, U2 is not a touring ensemble band like Sir Paul's current outfit. These guys are family. If one can't play for an extended period of gigs, none of them can.
 
I don't think the band would have wanted to have a U2 show (or a couple of dates, even) without a member. 26+ years of playing live, a single show with one member missing. What does that tell you?
(the Adam situation in 1993 is different, also with all due respect to him, it's one thing to fill in for a bass player and another to fill in for a guitar player)
I also think it wouldn't be quite the same for the fans.

To answer this thought:

"Maybe the question I was really asking was what happens when the unthinkable finally happens? A disagreement, a reevaluation of life’s priorities or a sudden and tragic death spells the end of U2 as we have known it for these many wonderful years. Would I want the band to end like The Beatles leaving us with only the memories of them together? Or would I want them to continue like REM or The Who with an altered lineup that stills brings enjoyment, but pales when I think of them alongside of the original?"

Depends. Is it the end as in "mutual decision - for whatever reason - to stop playing in current line-up" or is it the "tragic death/illness of a member" scenario?
I always think U2 will do it like the Beatles and call it quits. No reunion tours, no alter lineups.
I can't imagine, say, Bono and Edge hooking up with two nobodys and pose off as U2.
 
Last edited:
I think the question here is would U2 WANT to play without The Edge? Would they want to be up there performing knowing one of their family is away, worried sick and upset. I dont think they are the kind of band to carry on regardless.
I think in 1992 with Adam it was a wake up call. A kind of 'fuck you for partying, we'll go on without you!' type of thing.

I of course am feeling rather sniffly today because it would have been my second conert, but really, i'd rather them postpone the dates and see all 4 then see 23 with some guy i dont know and dont care about.
 
Also, using Bono in 2001 situation also doesn't apply as a comparison to this. I noticed people like to pull it up, along with Adam in 1993.
 
One more thing: it would be unfair and extremely disrespectful towards Edge had they gone and played without him.
 
usamilo said:
The Who started as a four man band in the 60’s. Their drummer died in the late 70’s. The band continued on for awhile, but were virtually inactive for much of the 80’s.

Most of the comments here are really good, makes for interesting reading while I waste away here in my boring office!

Just a small correction to usamilo's excellent comments: The Who did in fact go on a massive stadium tour in 1989 - their "last tour ever".

Even though Keith Moon (their original drummer) was no longer there, I was so glad that they soldiered on, for the benefit of the thousands of kids like me who never got the chance to see them before.

Although he was "just a drummer", Keith was an integral part of the band, and maybe one of the greatest rock drummers ever. His loss was devastating.

At that 1989 show, Pete Townshend kept apologizing to us, saying "it's not like it used to be", as if to head off any subsequent criticism. Who was he kidding? That show completely rocked, all 65,000 of us there were totally blown away by them, Moon or no Moon.

Point being: while this is not the right situation to consider such actions, many other great bands have continued after losing key members of the group (Stones, The Who, Sex Pistols, Van Halen, etc.).

Whether they are ever "as good" as the original lineup is always debatable.
 
Last edited:
Quote:
Originally posted by missknowitall
This thread is absolutely insensitive and callous. First of all, Adam & Larry are more "disposable?" Great, just replace them with who, two hair band rockers? Oh yeah, and Edge, if it is indeed your family with the illness, we are going on without you. Dallas, how is your health, what roadie could we get to take your place? Maybe McGuiness could step in, I'm sure his vocals would be great. There is only one guitar player, one bass player, one drummer, and one lead singer, and they are U2. You should be ashamed of yourselves, greedy and insenitive lot. Oh boo-hoo, shows got postponed so lets replace whomever to appease our greedy souls. Shame on you.



usamilo said:
Thank you Blue Room for the previous posts. The recent postponements had me thinking back to a concert I attended a few years back by another band. It was a different band with a different history, but for me brought up a subject that all fans must inevitably face.

A friend of mine (like Bono and The Edge) is a huge fan of The Who. The Who started as a four man band in the 60’s. Their drummer died in the late 70’s. The band continued on for awhile, but were virtually inactive for much of the 80’s. They started touring again in the late 90’s and returned to a stripped down lineup by the decades end.

I had tickets to see a show in 2002. The day before the tour began, the bassist and original band member, John Entwistle, died. Shockingly, the remaining two members recruited another bassist, rescheduled the first two dates of the tour and continued on.

The band took some criticism for launching into a tour just 4 days after the death of their bassist. Pete said that John lived to tour and John’s family urged them to go forward as a tribute to him. Pete also said that he felt canceling the tour would put a financial hardship on the many support people who had arranged their year to be on the road with them and were depending on the paycheck the tour would provide.

Upon hearing of John’s death, I never would have dreamed that I would be attending a Who concert nine days later. The show brought up a host of mixed emotions. It seemed wrong for someone else to be holding the bass. I wondered if it was respectful to be enjoying myself so close to the time of sorrow, but I was glad for the opportunity to be enjoying the camaraderie of fellow fans while mourning John’s passing. I didn’t think of the remaining two members as greedy that night. I actually thought of myself as fortunate that they chose to make themselves public during what must have been an indescribably painful time for them. Musically, I’m sure the concert was not in the top 500 in the band’s career. Emotionally, it had to be near the top.

The one thought I had more than any other at the time was that thank God nothing like this has happened to my beloved U2. I have been fortunate enough to follow a band for more than 20 years that has always been there for me. No one has died of an overdose. The lead singer and the guitarist haven’t gotten in fights that silence the band for years at a time. And none of the original members having gotten tired enough of touring to quit the band.

The original topic of discussion I started this thread with was not the real life touring crisis the band faces, but instead a slightly different set of fictional circumstances. I asked about the prospect of the band that took the stage for just a couple of shows was minus one of the four that have brought so much enjoyment to so many of us. I was only attempting to solicit the emotional responses such a fictional possibility might bring. I most definitely was not advocating the temporary replacement of a band member in the real life situation that the band finds itself in and has often been confused with the fictional set of circumstances that was the thread topic.

Maybe the question I was really asking was what happens when the unthinkable finally happens? A disagreement, a reevaluation of life’s priorities or a sudden and tragic death spells the end of U2 as we have known it for these many wonderful years. Would I want the band to end like The Beatles leaving us with only the memories of them together? Or would I want them to continue like REM or The Who with an altered lineup that stills brings enjoyment, but pales when I think of them alongside of the original?

Like all fans, I hope the current events work themselves out to the best possible conclusion. I truly believe we have yet to see the last of our boys from Dublin. I also know that someday the ride will end. That will be one hard day.

Peace


You know whoever said that people are getting too sensitive is damn right. At this point I would jus like to point to missknowitall. Reminder, this is a forum, not school. It seems that all you care about is stepping on some other fan's shoulders to elevate yourself as 'ooooooooooh, I am the best fan U2 has got, I care about their feelings'. Pathetic. In a forum, we can talk about what we like, and if you don't like it and have nothing constructive to add to the discussion, why don't you open that door and walk right out. I am sorry to others if I'm going on about this, but I hate oversensivity, its too often a tool for holierthanthou knowitalls. I am pretty sure even Edge would not mind if he saw the topic. And grudgingly I admit that missknowitall was right (though needlessly vicious) in one of her points. I do believe that it should have been pointed out that we are assuming that edge's family has the illness. otherwise this is an interesting thread.

On the thread itself, I dont think Edge should be replaced, because most fans won't like it. Yes, Adam has been replaced, and all bandmembers are equal, but you have got to consider stage personas. Bono is the prime stage persona, while edge is second, but he does play the primary sound, so to speak. But if it had been like Adam's in Australia in 93 (the band finding out when the fans had already gotten there) I think the band would have no choice. And I really think Dallas could have played the piano for RTRS and NYD.

Finally the above post is one more indicator of how a band can be strong and not be oversensitive ninnies. Sorry, I know this thread started long ago, but I had nothing to do so was just scanning, and that post riled me up.
 
^^^^^

I recognise the above post can make me look like a holierthanthou knowitall. Duly noted, judge for yourself.
 
Angela Harlem said:
The whole band let loose in Sydney on that tour. Bono stole a boat off a wharf, and got a girl sacked for whisking her away from a cafe at night in Bondi or Coogee or somewhere. But he later returned her and begged her boss to re-hire her after they'd sat on the beach and watched the sun rise.
The papers did report on what Adam was up to, which was partying in Kings Cross with some lady friends. But the official story was that he was ill from a stomach upset.

Heheh I think Bono engages in that kind of mischief everywhere he goes, though

:wink:

That chapter in Flanagan's book is hilarious! I only wish it detailed precisely what Adam drank on the night that did him in :wink:
 
missknowitall said:
This thread is absolutely insensitive and callous. First of all, Adam & Larry are more "disposable?" Great, just replace them with who, two hair band rockers? Oh yeah, and Edge, if it is indeed your family with the illness, we are going on without you. Dallas, how is your health, what roadie could we get to take your place? Maybe McGuiness could step in, I'm sure his vocals would be great. There is only one guitar player, one bass player, one drummer, and one lead singer, and they are U2. You should be ashamed of yourselves, greedy and insenitive lot. Oh boo-hoo, shows got postponed so lets replace whomever to appease our greedy souls. Shame on you.:mad:
An intolerant, pigheaded idiot like you without the necessary intellectual equipment to participate in an intelligent discussion really belongs in Zootopia, not here. Exhibit 1 that you can't participate in a civilized debate? That stunningly effective "screw you" when confronted with an excellent rebuttal to your witless drivel. Do you require a sherpa to escort you up to such a high moral perch? Zootopia has so many morons you'll feel right at home. :coocoo: :madspit:
 
Tampa Dan testy testy. I just have to wonder why anyone would be so stupid to even suggest that Dallas could replace the Edge. You are the one that dwells in witless drivel. Wouldn't the moderator of this thread feel AWFUL if something tragic did happen to Edge. I mean come on people, this man is going through his own family ordeal, I just hope to God he never sees this thread as its totally insensitive, and the timing couldn't be worse. This thread should be closed, NOW!
 
It's getting closed missknowitall, but not because you have a problem with the subject matter (which is allowed, or something would have been said when this thread was started 3 weeks ago). Not everyone is going to like the subject of every thread on here. It's getting closed because it's full of flames, profanity, and personal attacks from a few posters including you.

This shouldn't haven't even been bumped. Anyone who's been in this thread namecalling and attacking other members needs to read the forum rules before continuing to post.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom