jick
Refugee
We got quite a number of POP-free setlists in the Elevation Tour, and POP songs were making sporadic appearances. The only full band songs were Discotheque and Staring At The Sun. Staring At The Sun and Please made cameo appearances in the B-stage, and a much abridged version of Wake Up Dead Man was played infrequently also.
NEVER in U2's history have their played only two full band songs from their immediately preceding album in any given tour, except when that preceding album was POP.
During October Tour, they played more than 2 Boy songs full band. During the War Tour, they played more than 2 October song full band. During the UF Tour, they played more than 2 War songs full band. During the JT Tour, they played more than 2 UF songs full band. During the Lovetown Tour, they played more than 2 JT Tour songs full band ....well you kinda get what I mean.
It came to a grinding halt during the Elevation Tour when they played only two full band POP songs (on nights the audience was unlucky) and some POP free setlists (on nights when the audience was lucky).
Where's Mofo? LNOE? Full band Please? Miami? Velvet Dress? Do You Feel Loved? Well, U2 obviously didn't want to play them anymore. Then U2 went on to remix POP for the Best Of 1990-2000 collection.
It is obvious that U2 want to erase the stigma of the POP debacle that was brought forth during those dark ages of their musical creativity.
So I don't want to start another thread about the merits and demerits of POP. That has all been argued to death and that is precisely why I am posting on this forum (and not in EYKIW). I want to keep this topic purely on the setlist.
Now my question, will U2 finally fully turn their backs on POP on this tour, outgrow the album, and make a POP-free setlist? I honestly think so. What do you guys think? Do you think any POP songs in full band form will somehow sneak into the setlist?
Another thing worth considering - there was no full band POP song in the Slane DVD (which uses the same font as U2's new album). No POP on BBC Radio performance, or in New York surprise concert setlist. So perhaps this could be an omen of great things to come in the upcoming tour.
What do you guys think?
Hope all replies focus squarely on the setlist issues I have posed here and not on the problems of the POP album itselt.
Cheers,
J
NEVER in U2's history have their played only two full band songs from their immediately preceding album in any given tour, except when that preceding album was POP.
During October Tour, they played more than 2 Boy songs full band. During the War Tour, they played more than 2 October song full band. During the UF Tour, they played more than 2 War songs full band. During the JT Tour, they played more than 2 UF songs full band. During the Lovetown Tour, they played more than 2 JT Tour songs full band ....well you kinda get what I mean.
It came to a grinding halt during the Elevation Tour when they played only two full band POP songs (on nights the audience was unlucky) and some POP free setlists (on nights when the audience was lucky).
Where's Mofo? LNOE? Full band Please? Miami? Velvet Dress? Do You Feel Loved? Well, U2 obviously didn't want to play them anymore. Then U2 went on to remix POP for the Best Of 1990-2000 collection.
It is obvious that U2 want to erase the stigma of the POP debacle that was brought forth during those dark ages of their musical creativity.
So I don't want to start another thread about the merits and demerits of POP. That has all been argued to death and that is precisely why I am posting on this forum (and not in EYKIW). I want to keep this topic purely on the setlist.
Now my question, will U2 finally fully turn their backs on POP on this tour, outgrow the album, and make a POP-free setlist? I honestly think so. What do you guys think? Do you think any POP songs in full band form will somehow sneak into the setlist?
Another thing worth considering - there was no full band POP song in the Slane DVD (which uses the same font as U2's new album). No POP on BBC Radio performance, or in New York surprise concert setlist. So perhaps this could be an omen of great things to come in the upcoming tour.
What do you guys think?
Hope all replies focus squarely on the setlist issues I have posed here and not on the problems of the POP album itselt.
Cheers,
J