I mean that not everyone here was disappointed (we had some pretty fierce arguments with people taking both sides), and not everyone who went to the shows was satisfied. I think a lot of the gauge of how satisfied the crowd was depends upon how satisfied the person reporting things was themselves. It tended to be that those who really enjoyed the show, loved the set, and defended its static nature reported that the rest of the crowd were on their feet and loved it, while those who were critical of the show and its set would make comments about sections of the crowd looking bored, snide comments made by nearby concertgoers, etc.
Who cares if the crowd don't recognise it. I'll take whatever's got that live spark. A technically terrible performance can have it (think OOC, 2005-05-26), while a note-perfect performance can just fall flat.