Elvis said:
ThatGuy, in knowing that this message and thread would be posted today, I opted to address things here, and today.
I see.
Elvis said:
ThatGuy, in knowing that this message and thread would be posted today, I opted to address things here, and today.
ThatGuy said:I have heard that there are ways to access the internet when one is not at home. Perhaps I have been mislead.
Katey said:
Nope I have apologized to the person in who I had this conversation with on the phone, I have never claimed to have cell phone communication with the Edge, I might have come across wrong to them so I owed an apology to them for that.
Lara Mullen said:
Sure, Katey has just said
and after that Elvis is saying
Lies, lies and more lies.
Elvis said:
Both trips were not business trips, nor do I normally plan my trips based on the intention of spending my entire time away on the net. Both trips were of a personal nature and again, my time away was not to dedicated to being on the Internet. Why would one travel just to sit on a computer 24/7... seems like a waste.
none of my reponse to that or Elvis's were a lie, thank you.Lies, lies and more lies.
this is indeed a great pointU2girl said:Oh and, I don't buy it ALL the staff were tricked, particularly of interest is (but we'll probably never know) what you and Katey know. Interesting several people, including one ex-mod, did enough research on their own WEEKS ago to find out this was not The Edge.
brook said:
CBS quickly admitted their error when people began to question things and issued an immediate retraction and apology (the whole event lasted less than a week). This would be an entirely different deal if (assuming that you indeed have been duped all along) you had immediately posted a message that while you still believed that this was The Edge posting - valid doubts had been raised by a number of people and you were working to either dispel those doubts or confirm them.
Instead, you and members of your team kept insisting all was well and when people continued to raise questions, they were either trivialized our outright ignored. (I've yet to have a single question I've raised answered anywhere, except in this thread - after I quoted myself to ask it twice.) Thread after thread requesting information were locked without comment, while the poor mods were left twisting in the wind... while over a week went by with no comment or update from you. The fact that you are still stating in this thread that this might still be The Edge is only harming your effort to put this to rest.
You are a victim of your own success. This is now a very large forum and a lot of people are here - and not all of them are going to blindly believe everything you say. This is also a paid site and people expect your staff (albeit volunteer) to behave professionally. People will have long memories on this event.
I'm sure Interference will continue to thrive because it's the community after all that keeps these folks together. I know how hard it is to leave a community like this one. I just hope that you learn something from this.
Inner El Guapo said:
One more question, what happened concerning the mods? Did you ban some mods because of this issue?
yes, instead of doing this you kept insisting that this was indeed The Edge evenElvis said:
Many people had doubts, as well as made many assumptions and accusations. We decided to investigate this in private, and perhaps in hindsight... we should have just taken the interviews down, and locked "The Edge's" accounts while we did so - letting people know that we were looking into it and until further notice not to consider it as real. This was a mistake. If
ThatGuy said:
I understand, but like it or not Interference is now a business. Once you started accepting money from people your responsibility to the site increased greatly. And as I'm sure any business owner would tell you, sometimes you have to cut short or interrupt your vacation to attend to your business.
And I'm not suggesting that you had to spend all day on the internet while you were on vacation. Now who's being rude?
ThatGuy said:
I have heard that there are ways to access the internet when one is not at home. Perhaps I have been mislead.
Elvis said:In the last month, I've been away from home (another state or country) for half of that time (two weeks).... that would have a major part in my 'slowness' of dealing with the situation.
U2SavesTheWorld said:
This is a question I'd really like answered....
iacrobat said:
Holy shit man, give the guy a friggin' break. He fucked up, but if he wants to take a vacation for two weeks to visit his girlfriend and not deal with something he graciously offers us for nothing or almost nothing, he bloody well can. His obligation is very small.
After reading all this, all I can think is that it is *just* a U2 message board. As well, the people here make it go round. I don't come here for the content, I come becuase the board is filled with very lovely, smart and intelligent people.
Have some bloody perspective.
Sorry Biff, yes I had direct contact with this Edge via e-mail and my fault in this is not being more vigilant on my end with getting proof from PM. I had believed yes that this was something this Edge was doing in his free time, given the evidence I and senior staff had yes I believed this to be Edge at the time and I really do apologize for that and for not taking proper "official" steps that might have saved members some pain..this is why I apologizeI have a question directly for Katey, which I asked THREE TIMES in another thread, but which never got a response.
Elvis said:
I understand why you may see Interference as a business, however it is a hobby for all of us. I do not profit from this site, the memberships mostly just barely cover the costs, the affiliate deals and google ads dont bring in as much as some have assumed they do. I have kept Interference going on the condition that it could cover its own costs, either in the ways mentioned above, or by donations. Interference is anything but a means for me to get ahead, and in the long run has ended up costing me A LOT of money. I do this out of love for U2, the music, and the fan community. Although this really is beyond what you commented on, I wanted to express these things.
iacrobat said:
After reading all this, all I can think is that it is *just* a U2 message board. As well, the people here make it go round. I don't come here for the content, I come becuase the board is filled with very lovely, smart and intelligent people.
Have some bloody perspective.
iacrobat said:
Holy shit man, give the guy a friggin' break. He fucked up, but if he wants to take a vacation for two weeks to visit his girlfriend and not deal with something he graciously offers us for nothing or almost nothing, he bloody well can. His obligation is very small.
After reading all this, all I can think is that it is *just* a U2 message board. As well, the people here make it go round. I don't come here for the content, I come becuase the board is filled with very lovely, smart and intelligent people.
Have some bloody perspective.
Katey said:
Sorry Biff, yes I had direct contact with this Edge via e-mail and my fault in this is not being more vigilant on my end with getting proof from PM. I had believed yes that this was something this Edge was doing in his free time, given the evidence I and senior staff had yes I believed this to be Edge at the time and I really do apologize for that and for not taking proper "official" steps that might have saved members some pain..this is why I apologize
Elvis said:
The issue of the mods is not related as to if The Edge was real or not. It was an independent issue and one that has already been addressed elsewhere. I'd like to keep this thread on topic as it's been. Thanks
DaveC said:
I paid 20 god damned dollars that I worked for into Joel's pocket to be lied to.
I demand some answers to be accountable for MY cash that I sent to him. I paid for this service and it's my damn right to know what the hell is being done with MY money.
ThatGuy said:
I find it interesting that whenever anyone beings up the fact that some people give you money you are very quick to point out that you don't profit from it. Interesting.
Anyhow I had hoped, for the sake of those who pay you, that you would respect their payments by treating this site as anyone else who accepts cash for services would. But I see that unfortunatlely I was mistaken.
DaveC said:Ok, this is going to come off as hostile, but keep in mind we're pissed right now (including me):
I will ask some questions that I believe speak on behalf of everyone here that have been totally ignored.
1.) What EXACTLY (step-by-step) occurred in the verification of "The Edge"'s identity, and start with what ALL the mods did in terms of ID verification (e-mails, phone calls, etc.), beginning with the posts by "Dalkey Beach", going through the "interview", the Edge postings, and the "Ask The Edge" up to this very point?
2.) Exactly how many new Premium accounts have been created since "The Edge" started posting? I think you need to get in touch with all of those people and offer them a chance to have their money returned.
3.) Tell us, HONESTLY, yes or no, was the removal of Angela Harlem and Salome as mods directly related to their questioning of the identity of "The Edge"?
4.) I would like to hear from each of the staff directly what they know/knew about "The Edge".
Dammit, I want some answers!
I'm this fucking close to demanding my money be sent back to me. So you better make this good and believable.