Elvis said:
That said, I spent a good deal of time chatting with Angela this morning, and she recently found evidence that this person posted on u2 sites as far back as 2002 with the same email address. Again, this is something she only recently found - had we found this earlier (much), I'm sure none of this would have escalated to this point.
I spend a good deal of time chatting to Anna every day
that's even why you banned me for a couple of days, remember?
also completely irrelevant but yes
anyway what on earth are you trying to prove here?
you do know that Anna didn't tell you this because she is trying to help to solve this big mystery, yes?
if only because there was no big mystery
there was never any reason to believe this was The Edge and when she gave you a bunch of reasons why there should at least be sufficient doubt whether this was The Edge over a month ago you just brushed her off as you did with anyone who stated this wasn't The Edge
because - well - you apparently had evidence that this was the real deal (and what this evidence entailed we are still not supposed to know for some reason)
I would even guess that if you had been presented this 'evidence' over a month back you would have pointed out that this only proves this person - of whom you have evidence that he is indeed The Edge - has posted on the internet before
and why wouldn't The Edge have posted on the internet back in 2002? wouldn't you do the same if you were in a band? why would that prove this isn't The Edge? it's even less evidence than an IP address
it doesn't make a stronger case than any of the other info you were given back then, so why would this have made any difference?
or is it because you are starting to realise that your credibility is so far below zero that throwing in someone's name who people actually do trust might help you now?
anyway
I have no idea how on earth this could be seen as more conclusive evidence than anything you were told over a month ago
and I would still like to know whatever the supposed evidence was that you had that would show even us how you could have been mislead