WAIT IM CONFUSED DOES TEH EDGE LIEK DIME BARZ OR NOT?!?!?! PLZ ANSWR SOON!!!1!
But seriously, folks. Those tired of the "dead horse" can easily leave. There are thousands of other threads; go knock yourself out somewhere else. This thread is here to discuss what happened (until Joel closes it, naturally). Either deal with people debating and making their points or piss off.
I truly hope that if people take anything out of what happened, it's that this site cannot provide you with totally credible news. Period. Personal preferences regarding the site and the way it's run aside, there are simply too many journalistic issues for one to make Interference THE site for official U2 news. Sad, really, because it's a pretty darn good community overall.
Some of the things that have irritated me over the years (and yes, I've been here for years - pay no attention to the post count, or my name for that matter) are little things, for sure.
Like misleading headlines, for example. Like a news headline on Interference a while back that said "Scissor Sisters to Tour With U2". It SAID THAT! As if it were flat-out true! No need to read the article, you just got the information you needed!
Now, I'm willing to admit that maybe the headline came from the linked site that hosted the original article, but are you telling me that none of the "senior staff" (*genuflects*) compared the headline to the article (which basically consisted of a rumor, some vague information without any sources actually being cited, and absolutely NOTHING coming even CLOSE to saying that the SSs were going to tour with U2)? Oh, and not to mention that the Interference headline appeared WEEKS after the fact (and was covered CORRECTLY as it first happened by u2log.com, among other sites). But I digress.
And then there was "SOLAR". Oh, the humanity. But Interference said it, so it MUST be true! Yet, if Interference is so buddy-buddy with U2/PM, one would think that it could have been easily confirmed or denied (BEFORE posting it as legitimate, mind you) with a simple phone call or an email to an address that didn't end in yahoo.com or hotmail.com or what have you. Because I wouldn't put 100% faith in
theedgenoreally@yahoo.com, y'know? Or
dsmith@hotmail.com, or whoever the latest "culprit" was.
And that leads me up to this whole debacle. Is the staff seriously trying to put forth the excuses that we've seen so far, while also pretty much admitting that they were basing their beliefs on communication coming from an email address that didn't end in u2.com or island.co.uk or SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY MADE SOME SENSE?!
Oh, wait, I guess I forgot the OMG CELL PHONE CALL WITH TEH EDGE!!! Unreal. This is what counts for journalistic integrity?
Maybe some more information regarding what exactly was said to whom would help to bring my jaw up from the floor, but at this point, this "confirmation" that Joel et al were so SURE about is jaw-droppingly absurd and pathetic.
Finally, and I think the most important issue here (no, it's NOT the validity of the identity of the poster posing as The Edge) is the total joke of an interview that was posted. Posted on the FRONT PAGE, no less. This whole Edge mess happened in the forums, and not in direct view of a general public. I had to cringe as my local radio station mentioned how Interference was a great site with this "exclusive" interview. Just awful.
First off, we don't know WHO was interviewed. Interference interviewed "U2". What the HELL does that mean? "U2" is not a person. Next, WHO conducted the interview? The "senior staff" again. Were they all speaking simultaneously? How was the interview conducted? Email? Are you serious? And I don't suppose it came from a legitimate U2 email address, either, else that would have been perfect proof of legitimacy.
Once again, there's been NO real information given; we're simply asked to accept everything in good faith. And I don't believe we'll ever have any real information, because THERE ISN'T ANY that wouldn't be many times more damning than what we've already heard.
If you continue to use this site as your main source for information, good luck. I really can't see why one would, what with the glut of available U2 news sites.
How many times will you be misled before you decide to put your "good faith" in something worthwhile? I truly feel bad for the new fans who didn't know any better. I hope they'll make a smart decision and not have the wool pulled over their eyes like so many others.
And I do feel bad for Interference, honestly. Because if things don't change, and people don't demand more from this site, things will continue to fall apart like this. And the people here and the relationships that have been forged over time are great, and shouldn't be subject to this garbage.
I'm gonna go have a Dime Bar now.