Well, after looking more closely at the grammy nominees and award winners of the past 10 years for the major catagories, I think I'd probably have to throw out most of my theories about the split votes. The only thing that seems certain is how unpredictable the process is.
It still seems that veteran artist tend to have a "slight" and I underline "slight", edge, but artist like Lauran Hill and Norah Jones have won album of the year with their debut albums.
If Kanye West was indeed set to win the Grammy award for album of the year last, but was only blocked by the Ray Charles album as several music critics claim, then perhaps the nominee set up for album of the year will benefit Kanye West this year. Looking at the list again, the split vote might actually work to help Kenye win this year.
Notice that three of the album of the year nominees are big veteran artist, Mariah Carey(yep, she has been a contender for Grammy awards since 1990, almost as long as U2 who became a contender in 1987), Paul McCartney and U2. Perhaps the acadamy will be evenly split among these three artist to a degree that will allow Kanye West to climb to the top. I don't think Kanye West has the pull that Lauryn Hill and Norah Jones had during their years that they won. Being loved and worshiped by music critics who write for papers and magazines is not enough. Rap is still not accepted as being music by certain portions of the academy and Kanye West album's have not sold in the large numbers that Norah Jones or Lauren Hill's album did for those basing votes on sales. In fact, most of Kanye West album sales come from the USA.
Another little interesting fact that I had forgotten is the presence for the past ten years of the BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE. This Committee takes a look at only the three big catagories, Album of the Year, Song of the Year, and Record of the Year. After the nominee votes are counted, they look at the top 20 voted songs and albums in each of the big three catagories. They take into consideration how the votes came out, but then make "adjustments" to better reflect the best quality music. So after the 12,000 member academy votes, a committee of two dozen people looks at the big three catagory and the top 20 finishers in each, and makes adjustments for the final 5 nominees in each catagory.
So, U2's, Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own, may have been nominated for Record Of The Year based on the votes of the 12,000 member academy, but then taken out of the top 5 by the BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE, or alternatively, it may have missed making it into the top 5 for song of the year, then was put into the top 5 by the committee. Same could have happened for BOMB. The only thing we do know is that any song that made it into the final nominations, was definitely in the top 20 when the initial votes of the 12,000 member academy were counted.
NOTE: The Blue Ribbon Academy only makes adjustments for the "BIG THREE" awards, not any others.
In any event, I think Kanye West has much better shot than I thought he did before, but I'd still say from looking at the past 10 years, that its almost impossible to predict who will win.
The one thing that U2 have going for them is that they have won nearly every award that they have been nominated for in their career. They have won 17 Grammy awards and have only lost at most 6 times. I doubt there will be anyone at the awards ceremony, nominated or not, who has won as many Grammy awards as U2.
Does anyone know how betting is going in Vegas on this or anywhere else where such things take place?