cobl04
45:33
Just a convo I was having with a mate recently... it's a topic that can be hotly debated, and, realistically, there is probably no real answer, as it's too hard to compare sportsmen across sports. But let's chew the fat anyway, huh?
I suppose the obvious ones are your Babe Ruths, Michael Jordans... Phelps is of course phenomenal, but to be fair I'm pretty sure he's a cyborg, and not actually human. Lance Armstrong.
Don't know enough about soccer, baseball, basketball etc to comment, but let me lay down my claim: Sir Donald Bradman. An Australian cricketer for those who don't know, he simply has to be it. He averaged 99.96, meaning any score less than 99 when he went out to bat was technically a failure. His average is almost 39 higher than the next best. There has been over 200 years of competitive cricket. And of course, he's Australian
I suppose the obvious ones are your Babe Ruths, Michael Jordans... Phelps is of course phenomenal, but to be fair I'm pretty sure he's a cyborg, and not actually human. Lance Armstrong.
Don't know enough about soccer, baseball, basketball etc to comment, but let me lay down my claim: Sir Donald Bradman. An Australian cricketer for those who don't know, he simply has to be it. He averaged 99.96, meaning any score less than 99 when he went out to bat was technically a failure. His average is almost 39 higher than the next best. There has been over 200 years of competitive cricket. And of course, he's Australian