College Football 2010

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
nick foles will be the starter next year. the coaches finally wised up and started playing him after matt scott shit the bed against iowa.

foles played great at times but struggled against USC (even though UA did win). he looked like absolute crap (along with the rest of the team) against nebraska.

UA gets washington, cal, usc and ASU at home.
Oregon, ucla and stanford on the road
 
just saw this on the espnews scroll:

baylor, kansas, kansas state, iowa state and missouri discuss plans to keep big 12 together and maintain bcs automatic-qualifier status if other schools such as texas and oklahoma leave conference.

::clears throat::

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
Well now it's looking like the Big 12 is going all in to keep Texas and OK which would mean a 10 team league. So do the Big 10 and Big 12 now switch names?

Supposedly there will be a rule change to allow the Big 12 of now 10 teams to still have a conference championship game and the terms include Texas getting their own network.

I swear, Texas is more high maintenance than a Victoria's Secret model.

My guess is if the Big 12 ends up with 10 teams, the Pac-10 will just add Utah to be the Pac 12.
 
Well now it's looking like the Big 12 is going all in to keep Texas and OK which would mean a 10 team league. So do the Big 10 and Big 12 now switch names?

Supposedly there will be a rule change to allow the Big 12 of now 10 teams to still have a conference championship game and the terms include Texas getting their own network.

There is zero chance that a 10 team Big 12 (which I doubt happens) would get a conference championship game. It would be Oklahoma-Texas almost every year, so why would the conference risk a National Championship spot by having them play twice? More than that what reason would the NCAA have to give them make this exception? I think all this talk is rumours in part from that blogger Chip Brown who seems desperate to remain in the spotlight.
 
what a let down

from a massive super conference and all that money, to colorado and utah

:down:
 
The money isn't that big of a deal to me. We're Texas. There's plenty of it. Our own network? Awesome, if it manages to happen. But what does bother me is the fact that a legitimate stamp could have been made on the college football world if major programs like OU and Texas went to the Pac-10, joining USC and Oregon and the like. It would have been a nice step in the right direction, and that's coming from a BSC apologist. Instead, here we are getting to play Iowa State again and again. Considering the fact that Nebraska's defection means two marquee teams in the Big 12minus2, I'm none too pleased.

One funny thing about it, though, is the fact that aggy's "run" to the SEC found them again following Daddy. Sure, this new deal is potentially lucrative for them (they stand to make over $20mil a year on TV revenue along with their Oklahoman and true Texan superiors), but after seeing aggy puff their widdle chests about TRULY saying "goodbye to texas university," here they are again following in our shadow. Here's hoping Garrett Gilbert and Landry "Porn Stache" Jones give them a big ole slap this year.

Chiggariggaroo! Chiggariggarem! Oh no, we're fucked, Texas A&M!
 
i would much rather that we got rid of Texas Tech instead of Nebraska. as for ATM, well it really sucks to play there as much as it sucks to play in Lubbock. Fuck both of those places!
 
Interested in a ridiculously early top 25 courtesy of EA Sports and the NCAA Football 11 production team? Of course you are, even if it doesn't make a shit. Here are the rankings according to the game:

1 – Alabama
2 – Ohio St
3 – Texas
4 – Oregon
5 – Boise State
6 – Florida
7 – Virginia Tech
8 – TCU
9 – Nebraska
10 – Iowa
11 – Wisconsin
12 – Georgia Tech
13 – USC
14 – Miami
15 – Oklahoma
16 – Pitt
17 – LSU
18 – Penn St
19 – Oregon St
20 – Arkansas
21 – Florida St
22 – North Carolina
23 – Utah
24 – Cincinnati
25 – Houston
 
I certainly do. It's definitely better for the two to stick together in my mind. I can't imagine not making the trip to Fair Park every year. It's downright un-American. Also, Oklahoma going to the SEC with A&M could have been a huge recruiting hit for us, so I'm doubly glad it was averted.
 
I certainly do. It's definitely better for the two to stick together in my mind. I can't imagine not making the trip to Fair Park every year. It's downright un-American. Also, Oklahoma going to the SEC with A&M could have been a huge recruiting hit for us, so I'm doubly glad it was averted.

the only thing i really dont like about the OU-TX game is that it starts so damn early. Other than that, i cannot imagine that game not taking place every year.

Looking forward to this years game!
 
USA Today Coaches' Poll - Preseason

RK
1 Alabama (55)
2 Ohio State (4)
3 Florida
4 Texas
5 Boise State
6 Virginia Tech
7 TCU
8 Oklahoma
9 Nebraska
10 Iowa
11 Oregon
12 Wisconsin
13 Miami (FL)
14 Penn State
15 Pittsburgh
16 LSU
17 Georgia Tech
18 North Carolina
19 Arkansas
20 Florida State
21 Georgia
22 Oregon State
23 Auburn
24 Utah
24 West Virginia

Others receiving votes: Cincinnati 135, Houston 76, Brigham Young 66, Arizona 65, Mississippi 48, Clemson 44, Stanford 41, Connecticut 40, Notre Dame 38, South Carolina 38, Washington 26, Missouri 23, Navy 12, Oklahoma State 11, Boston College 10, Michigan State 10, Arizona State 6, California 6, Texas Tech 5, South Florida 4, Texas A&M 3, Temple 2, Northwestern 2, Mississippi State 1, Nevada 1, Northern Illinois 1, Central Michigan 1, Southern Methodist 1,
 
Texas finalized a home-and-home with BYU in 2013 and 2014. The jokes pretty much write themselves.
 
university-of-michigan_logo.jpg
 
The only good thing about this season is that it will be Rich Rod's last.

Also, apparently, there will be a lot of scrutiny on Les Miles this season....so if Michigan and LSU both have sub-par seasons, perhaps Miles will come to Ann Arbor this time around.
 
The word on the street is that Harbaugh is already being lined up in the background.

He seems so ensconced in Palo Alto, but, if that were true, it wouldn't suck either. It would be hard to turn down the Michigan job, no matter how happy you are out at Stanford, I suppose.
 
Back
Top Bottom