The Beatles Appreciation Thread

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Yeah, the less said about the White Album tinkering, the better. It's odd to me to say that "at it's core, the album is..." when it's clearly so many things. And when you have 6+ songs that rock the fuck out, they're not outliers, they're part of the tapestry itself.

Also, Magical Mystery Tour and Sgt. Pepper's aren't from the same sessions, aside from Penny Lane, Strawberry Fields, and Only A Northern Song (which is what I did with my own custom tracklist). So it's not blasphemous but just has no basis in reality. You may as well combine Let It Be and Abbey Road.

I will say that I do like the idea of using the Anthology version of The Long and Winding Road, as I also felt the Naked version left something to be desired, particularly with the vocal. So that seems like a perfect compromise. However, I think Two Of Us is such a great opener with the two rival partners singing together, it seems crazy to bury it on side 2. Also, I question the legitimacy of opening with two Paul songs in a row. There's just no precedent for it (With A Little Help From My Friends at least has a Ringo lead vocal), and you did the same thing with two Lennon songs on your White Album.

Reposting my own, and I prefer to keep in the little studio talking and off-the-cuff missives as it's in the spirit of the original concept):

1. Two of Us
2. One After 909
3. I Me Mine
4. Don't Let Me Down
5. I've Got a Feeling
6. The Ballad of John and Yoko
7. The Long and Winding Road
(side break)
8. Get Back (+ outro chatter)
9. Dig A Pony
10. Maggie May
11. Old Brown Shoe
12. Dig It (2:30 excerpt from longer version, keeps lead-in to title track from official release)
13. Let It Be
14. Across the Universe

I removed For You Blue because it sucks.
 
if giles does a remix of abbey road the exact same way as he did the white album that's all i'll need.

I Want You (She's So Heavy) (2019 Mix) :drool:
 
giphy.gif
 
Lol. Triggered? Lol. Facts don't care about your feelings lol.

that's a joke, I hate those right-wing losers.
wow, when's the last time we used spoiler tags?!
probably Mike's last baby-on-the-table-at-a-festival fly-by
or a Mofo robin-hood/Andrew WK fly-by

But seriously though, that track is phenomenal.
 
Lol. Triggered? Lol. Facts don't care about your feelings lol.

that's a joke, I hate those right-wing losers.
wow, when's the last time we used spoiler tags?!
probably Mike's last baby-on-the-table-at-a-festival fly-by
or a Mofo robin-hood/Andrew WK fly-by

But seriously though, that track is phenomenal.
 
Hey folks, we're coming up on the 10th anniversary of the 9/9/09 Beatles remasters release, but more importantly the birth of the Beatoffs puns that occupied B&C for quite some time:

Of course, Imperor was the one who got us into this mess:

http://www.u2interference.com/forums/f221/the-beatles-remastered-190366-35.html#post6364744

impy13 said:
Let's all get up and dance to a song that was a hit before Lance's Mother was born.

lazarus said:
Being For The Benefit Of Mr. Pimp?

impy13 said:
Kind of inessential. "I've Just Creamed a Face" was better.

No spoken words said:
You could have a fucking field day with Beatles song titles tied to Lance's Mom references. Like, you could write a short story.

This eventually gave birth (no pun intended) to the dedicated Lance's Mom thread, which sadly has fallen into disrepair, like its namesake.
 
It's been really interesting to read many of these comments, starting from p1 on through. I didn't read much of the tinkering with each album's track list ( i almost typed "set list" :lol: )
I do look forward to reading your two recent posts namcurK.

It's because i was there back in '64 (at almost 11 yrs old) for just about all of it !

This listing of some of the American vs Brit album titles always confuses me. I guess i should wiki them and see side by side song listings.
I've never followed up on all these other anthologies, unreleased tracks, demos that some of you mention, except for "1" .

Two disagreements with some of you.

The Beatles were quite a good lme ve band waaaay back in the day in Hamburg , and at The Cavern (from all i've read in the past).
When they realized that they could a hardly be heard on tour in the USA they perhaps didn't try ad hard. John i think was particularly annoyed by this.

I was at both Shea Std shows '65 & '66. In 65 i couldn't hear much. In '66 however (i was along the first baseline, mid-tier) and i could hear most of it! Steve Van Zhant (who was sitting around the same area) said on his radio show, that some quirk in the acoustics let that section actually hear them.

One main reason they quit touring (at least re The USA) were the death threats being made against them in The South.

I guess that brings me to that "false prophets" article. Interesting POV, not sure i agree in the sense that we would have had to see what their next album (had they stuck together) to really see the trend.
As for "hot takes" Hip-Hop and Rap certainly emerged.

Reminds me a bit of the wonderful Mavis Staples talking about the difference between Motown and Stax records. She said something along the lines of at Stax blues, r&b, country were all interacting with each other to give it a less polished, more raucous and even rougher sound.

I along with so many other fans watched The Beatles evolve.
I think think many of their "pop" tunes were masterful!
My favorites: I Feel Fine, Eight Days A Week, She Loves You, Tell Me Why, AHDN. and uh, no, they don't sound the same. I don't know who cameup with the buzzing twang right ater the first bass note. Innovative!

Beatles VI, Help is to me are intermediaries before the next musical evolution of theirs. You like Me Too Much, The Night Before, Help, You're Gonna Lose That Girl are my favs.

Then of course comes Revolver, Rubber Soul, and srgnt Pepper! We were just floored (in a good way ) at what they were doing! I remember walking across (westward) in The Village (nyc) with my dad and sis when i spotted Srgnt Peppers album cover taped up on the front window of a record shop! :hyper:

Its getting late so i'll sign off. (I do love much of The White Album, too)

I'll leave you with one last gem.

Vin Scelsa[A/B] - NJ/NY's (former) Master free-form DJ tand often fabulous storyteller told a tale of how he and a friend discovered The White Album in a dept store not yet up on the racks, stole copies and put it on the air later that night on their College Radio station. How bad we felt that year, and how this lifted our spirits! Give it a kisten, you won't be disappointed!

 
Last edited:
A day late on the 9/9 celebration, but it's been a busy Beatles week for me. I finished up rock critic Rob Sheffield's book Dreaming The Beatles, which I can't recommend highly enough. It's not a regurgitation of biography and recording trivia, but rather a deeper dive through an obsessive fan's perspective, with a heavy dose of humor. He's a few years older than me, but still has his finger on the pulse of current music (and references it on occasion in the book), so it's a perspective I can relate to heavily. It's been out for a couple years now and you can get a used copy for under $10 at this point.

I opted not to pull the trigger on the Abbey Road 50th deluxe set. For one, I'm not as big of a fan of the album as most others, and the set isn't nearly as appetizing in terms of extras as The White Album's 50th deluxe set (the relative lack of material from the sessions is the main reason). Besides. However, I'll likely do what I did last year and keep an eye on eBay for one at a reduced price; I'm sure at some point it will come down low enough and I'll snag one.

What I did buy this week were used copies of the Anthology hardcover book and the DVD boxed set of the Anthology documentary, which cost me $10 and $20 respectively. It's nice to reap the benefits of the death of physical media. Can't wait to look through that stuff for the first time in 20 years.

I also rewatched Yellow Submarine, which I don't have too much to say about other than it's a bummer they couldn't get the actual band members to do the voices. I mean, they weren't stoked about the idea of the film in the first place, but one can only imagine how much better it would have been if their personalities were not just pale replications.

And now for the meat of the post: as many of you know, The White Album has long been my favorite by the band, and it's also my #2 album of all time, period. I don't skip anything when I listen to it, even the tracks that I find annoying (Wild Honey Pie), eye-rolling (Honey Pie), or merely subpar considering what else was recorded during the sessions (Savoy Truffle instead of Not Guilty??).

I've tampered with the tracklisting of other Beatles albums before, most notably Let It Be. But I know I speak for many of the band's fans who are frustrated that, despite the high quality of the albums, they're often missing some of the best tracks from their respective years, which were plucked to be released as singles and because of tradition, not replicated on the following LPs. This isn't something that the band did by choice; the record company wanted to keep a steady stream of material coming from their hottest property, and wouldn't let them go 6 months without releasing anything. George Martin himself regretted this move in one famous instance:

"The only reason that Strawberry Fields Forever and Penny Lane didn't go onto the new album was a feeling that if we issued a single, it shouldn't go onto an album. That was a crazy idea, and I'm afraid I was partly responsible. It's nonsense these days, but in those days it was an aspect that we'd try to give the public value for money.

The idea of a double A side came from me and Brian, really. Brian was desperate to recover popularity, and so we wanted to make sure that we had a marvellous seller. He came to me and said, 'I must have a really great single. What have you got?' I said, 'Well, I've got three tracks – and two of them are the best tracks they've ever made. We could put the two together and make a smashing single.' We did, and it was a smashing single – but it was also a dreadful mistake. We would have sold far more and got higher up in the charts if we had issued one of those with, say, When I'm Sixty-Four on the back."

The failure to reach the top was because many chart compilers counted the double a-side as two individual releases


Anyway, it's safe to say that Strawberry Fields and Penny Lane would have improved Sgt. Pepper's considerably, and one could say the same thing about Day Tripper/We Can Work It Out and Rubber Soul, Paperback Writer/Rain and Revolver as well. The band would often wind up writing what they regarded as filler to pad out the albums when they didn't have enough material because they were donating some of their best stuff each time.

In the case of The White Album, the single sacrifices this time around were Hey Jude and Revolution. The latter did wind up making it onto the album in its original, acoustic incarnation, but the other band members convinced Lennon to record a harder version for the single release. And so, while I think the double album is phenomenal in its own right, I also happen to think that it's missing Lennon and McCartney's best respective contributions to those sessions (just as with the pre-Sgt. Pepper's singles), and can't help wondering what they would like like put back in.

Unfortunately, the idiots behind the White Album 50th neglected to do new stereo mixes for those songs, though strangely they did do it for Strawberry Fields and Penny Lane on the Pepper's 50th. That's ok though, because I just used the mono mixes and was able to draw from the White Album's as well as the ones for Past Masters.

To some people, any interruption of the original order is going to seem like blasphemy, but bear with me. I made my own rule not to remove anything to make room for it, so these are merely additions in the places I felt they worked best. Hey Jude was an easy choice for me. It's the show-stopper, the climax, the grand finale. It simply couldn't work as an opener, or buried in the middle somewhere. The problem is, there was no way I was going to have anything other than Good Night at the album's end. Luckily, this album has two halves (or four sections, if you want to go with the vinyl format).

What this means is that Julia is no longer the final song on "Disc One", or Part One. And while that may feel a little strange, I think it ties in pretty nicely. Lennon's song is a loving tribute to his deceased mother, while McCartney's song was written for John's neglected son Julian. So there's a nice through-line that takes us through the generations. Sonically, it's not as if Julia's ending has some kind of air of finality that needed to be preserved, and it's blanketed on the other end by Paul's understated I Will.

The next task was to find a place for the electric version of Revolution. It's a full-on sonic assault that to me needed a major spotlight. I wasn't going to tamper with the album's opener Back in the U.S.S.R., but once again, this album has two halves. So I put it at the beginning of "Disc Two", bumping Birthday ahead. While I enjoy Birthday, it's just a fun rocker that isn't exactly holy or "important". And the songs go well together because of the continued energy.

I wasn't done yet, because the exclusion of Harrison's Not Guilty is something that always bothered me. And only this week, I learned something I hadn't known before: George wasn't even in town when the band decided on the final tracklisting and gave it the boot. They literally did 99 takes of Not Guilty before proclaiming it finished, so I'd like to think George would have fought harder for its inclusion, even if he had to lose Savoy Truffle in the process, for example. My placement of this track (taken from Anthology 3) was slightly more arbitrary than the other two, but I wound up putting it right between Birthday and Yer Blues. Blasphemous to some, I'm sure. But I thought it would be nice to have a George song sooner on the album instead of having to wait until track 7 (where Long, Long, Long finally appears on the original). And it's part of a run of rockers that really beefs up this half of Part Two; in addition to the other songs mentioned, you have Everybody's Got Something to Hide... and Helter Skelter.

I should also add that despite adding the electric Revolution, I opted to retain the acoustic version as well. As I said, I didn't want to remove anything, and I think it's a nice aesthetic counterpoint and reprise. It's a more subdued take on the material, and yet John adding "...in" after the "you can count me out" is a nice ironic endorsement of violent protest.

One final note is that I considered adding Lennon's What's the New Mary Jane, because it was recorded a number of times and is a pretty adventurous track. But it's rather long, and I felt that it would dampen the effect of Revolution 9 because of all the weirdness and tape effects. Plus, if John felt that strongly about it, he probably would have put it on the album himself.

PART ONE (53:29)
1. Back in the USSR
2. Dear Prudence
3. Glass Onion
4. Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da
5. Wild Honey Pie
6. Bungalo Bill
7. While My Guitar Gently Weeps
8. Happiness is a Warm Gun
9. Martha My Dear
10. I'm So Tired
11. Blackbird
12. Piggies
13. Rocky Raccoon
14. Don't Pass Me By
15. Why Don't We Do It In The Road?
16. I Will
17. Julia
18. Hey Jude

PART TWO (53:15)
1. Revolution
2. Birthday
3. Not Guilty
4. Yer Blues
5. Mother Nature's Son
6. ...Except For Me and My Monkey
7. Sexy Sadie
8. Helter Skelter
9. Long, Long, Long
10. Revolution 1
11. Honey Pie
12. Savoy Truffle
13. Cry Baby Cry
14. Revolution 9
15. Good Night


Come at me.
 
Last edited:
the worst thing about that post is you repeatedly calling the original album version of revolution "acoustic".

otherwise, i can't argue with any of it (except to be annoyingly pedantic and point out that not guilty actually required 102 takes, not 99). :up:
 
For what it's worth, the electric guitar was added later several weeks later in overdubs.

And re: Not Guilty, the liner notes for Anthology 3 said take 99 was considered the best but I overlooked that 102 was the one they actually included in the collection. Which makes me wonder what happened to 99!

Glad you don't object to my placements, I thought it would be a little more controversial.

I forgot that the Mono version doesn't include the Helter Skelter epilogue, where it fades back in, followed by Ringo's "blisters!" remark. Can't really do without that so I suppose I'd either put the Stereo version there instead, or do a little cut and paste just for the reprise.
 
Revolution at the start of Disc 2 works, but I’m not sure Birthday following it does. The fury of the former going into a relatively fun song is a bit jarring. I think I’d put Not Guilty in between.

Speaking of which, the original, unedited version of Not Guilty from last year’s box set would be my choice, over the truncated one from the Anthology.

Also, if you don’t mind it being shortened by 8 seconds, Hey Jude was remixed for the 2015 re-release of the 1 compilation and sounds great. Unfortunately Revolution isn’t on there.
 
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2...reak-up-mark-lewisohn-abbey-road-hornsey-road

'This tape rewrites everything we knew about the Beatles'
Mark Lewisohn knows the Fab Four better than they knew themselves. The expert’s tapes of their tense final meetings shed new light on Abbey Road – and inspired a new stage show

Richard Williams
Wed 11 Sep 2019 06.00 BST

The Beatles weren’t a group much given to squabbling, says Mark Lewisohn, who probably knows more about them than they knew about themselves. But then he plays me the tape of a meeting held 50 years ago this month – on 8 September 1969 – containing a disagreement that sheds new light on their breakup.

They’ve wrapped up the recording of Abbey Road, which would turn out to be their last studio album, and are awaiting its release in two weeks’ time. Ringo Starr is in hospital, undergoing tests for an intestinal complaint. In his absence, John Lennon, Paul McCartney and George Harrison convene at Apple’s HQ in Savile Row. John has brought a portable tape recorder. He puts it on the table, switches it on and says: “Ringo – you can’t be here, but this is so you can hear what we’re discussing.”

What they talk about is the plan to make another album – and perhaps a single for release in time for Christmas, a commercial strategy going back to the earliest days of Beatlemania. “It’s a revelation,” Lewisohn says. “The books have always told us that they knew Abbey Road was their last album and they wanted to go out on an artistic high. But no – they’re discussing the next album. And you think that John is the one who wanted to break them up but, when you hear this, he isn’t. Doesn’t that rewrite pretty much everything we thought we knew?”

Lewisohn turns the tape back on, and we hear John suggesting that each of them should bring in songs as candidates for the single. He also proposes a new formula for assembling their next album: four songs apiece from Paul, George and himself, and two from Ringo – “If he wants them.” John refers to “the Lennon-and-McCartney myth”, clearly indicating that the authorship of their songs, hitherto presented to the public as a sacrosanct partnership, should at last be individually credited.

Then Paul – sounding, shall we say, relaxed – responds to the news that George now has equal standing as a composer with John and himself by muttering something mildly provocative. “I thought until this album that George’s songs weren’t that good,” he says, which is a pretty double-edged compliment since the earlier compositions he’s implicitly disparaging include Taxman and While My Guitar Gently Weeps. There’s a nettled rejoinder from George: “That’s a matter of taste. All down the line, people have liked my songs.”

John reacts by telling Paul that nobody else in the group “dug” his Maxwell’s Silver Hammer, a song they’ve just recorded for Abbey Road, and that it might be a good idea if he gave songs of that kind – which, John suggests, he probably didn’t even dig himself – to outside artists in whom he had an interest, such as Mary Hopkin, the Welsh folk singer. “I recorded it,” a drowsy Paul says, “because I liked it.”

:hmm:
 
i wonder what the beatles would have been like if paul had capitulated and accepted allan klein (blech) as their manager and gone on to make another album or two.

mother
working class hero
god
well well well
it don't come easy
junk
maybe i'm amazed
teddy boy
that would be something
my sweet lord
what is life
isn't it a pity
all things must pass

(i don't have another 1970 ringo song)
 
Last edited:
i wonder what the beatles would have been like if paul had capitulated and accepted allan klein (blech) as their manager and gone on to make another album or two.

mother
working class hero
god
well well well
it don't come easy
junk
maybe i'm amazed
teddy boy
that would be something
my sweet lord
what is life
isn't it a pity
all things must pass

(i don't have another 1970 ringo song)

This is definitely an interesting concept though I wonder how much of John’s POB songs would have existed in the same format had they been Beatles songs. Maybe similar music, but some completely different lyrics? Other than that I think George and Paul’s songs would be pretty much the same with some small changes as the group took them on
 
working class hero certainly would have been very different. pretty much everything else would be probably similar to the released product though. they did do a full-band demo version of all things must pass during the demo sessions for the white album that (although it's totally half-assed) sounds very much like the song as released on george's album:

 
Last edited:
This is definitely an interesting concept though I wonder how much of John’s POB songs would have existed in the same format had they been Beatles songs. Maybe similar music, but some completely different lyrics? Other than that I think George and Paul’s songs would be pretty much the same with some small changes as the group took them on

This.

I don't see John singing "I don't believe in Beatles" on one of their records.

It's what makes John's solo career more fascinating than the others', even if he's inconsistent. Because there's really a clear break in what he seemed to be doing creatively once the band was over.
 
to me, singing "i don't believe in beatles" on a beatles album with a big smirking grin on his face seems like exactly the kind of thing 1970 john lennon would relish doing.
 
...and something the other 3 might veto.

Not to mention the rest of the lyrics, which are reall:down:y anti-endorsements I don’t see the rest of them wanting to be seen as supporting.
 
paul got them to do dozens of takes of maxwell's silver hammer and got it onto abbey road despite the other 3 all absolutely despising the song. same with ob-la-di ob-la-da. john likely could have easily leveraged that to get at least paul to agree.

and besides if they did the "four songs each individually credited" structure, i doubt they would have given the others a flat veto power over their own sections of the album.

in any case i'm glad this is just hypothetical - one more beatles album would have of course been great, but then we wouldn't have had all things must pass or plastic ono band (at least not at all the way they exist now), which would be a huge shame.
 
Back
Top Bottom