Are we comparing the JT tour's static setlists to one where the band was opening up with 8 new songs in a row on the first leg?
lol
I tend to agree with this. There's no question that ZooTV had very static setlists, but they weren't relying much on older material. By the time the final leg of the tour came around, at a point in the tour at which U2 would likely drop newer material for warhorses now, they were actually adding more new material(from Zooropa).
Take the ZooTV Sydney setlist. Setting aside the two covers(Satellite Of Love and Can't Help Falling In Love), there were 20 tracks played. Of those 20, 13 of them were Achtung/Zooropa tracks. Of those 20, 18 were from JT or later, meaning 18 of 20 original tracks came from the most recent 4 albums, 13 from the most recent 2. The only pre JT tracks in that setlist were NYD and Pride.
It would be like if the I+E setlists were 20 tracks long and 18 of them came from ATYCLB or later and 13 of them came from NLOTH and SOI. Like this(Streets and One being the 'old' tracks):
1. The Miracle
2. California
3. Volcano
4. Raised By Wolves
5. Cedarwood Road
6. Iris
7. Every Breaking Wave
8. Magnificent
9. Get On Your Boots
10. Crazy Tonight
11. Elevation
12. Vertigo
13. Beautiful Day
14. City Of Blinding Lights
15. Where The Streets Have No Name
16. One
17. Kite or Moment Of Surrender
18. This Is Where You Can Reach Me Now
19. Invisible
20. The Crystal Ballroom
21. The Troubles