Radiohead: The King of Limbs, Continued - Page 35 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Lemonade Stand > Just the Bang and the Clatter
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-03-2011, 03:37 PM   #511
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Catman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 3,519
Local Time: 03:39 AM
While I wouldn't say there is any specific track that I dislike per se, there also isn't one that really moves me at an emotional level; it's a very cerebral record compared to the more visceral In Rainbows, IMO.

Also, whenever I listen to KoL, I can't help but think that the entire record was recorded while Radiohead were hopped up on adderall or something. It seems like so much attention was made towards the tiny details, that the band sort of forgot about the larger picture - so while the songs themselves aren't bad, the record as a whole doesn't seem to measure up to the sum of its parts.

meh, that's just my overall take on The King of Limbs at the moment
__________________

Catman is offline  
Old 04-03-2011, 07:22 PM   #512
45:33
 
cobl04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: East Point to Shaolin
Posts: 55,637
Local Time: 06:39 PM
little Annie Adderall was an outcast in high school...
__________________

cobl04 is offline  
Old 04-04-2011, 01:40 AM   #513
Blue Crack Supplier
 
lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 38,527
Local Time: 01:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catman View Post
I can't help but think that the entire record was recorded while Radiohead were hopped up on adderall or something. It seems like so much attention was made towards the tiny details, that the band sort of forgot about the larger picture - so while the songs themselves aren't bad, the record as a whole doesn't seem to measure up to the sum of its parts.

Something this album's cheerleaders are oblivious to, sadly.
lazarus is offline  
Old 04-04-2011, 08:34 AM   #514
Blue Crack Addict
 
Lancemc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ba Sing Se
Posts: 17,675
Local Time: 03:39 AM
Be more condescending about it.
Lancemc is offline  
Old 04-04-2011, 09:04 AM   #515
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Imperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 9,044
Local Time: 03:39 AM
No, Lance. We're wrong to enjoy this album as much as we do. I already came to terms with the fact that my opinion is incorrect. You should do the same.
Imperor is offline  
Old 04-04-2011, 10:33 AM   #516
Blue Crack Supplier
 
lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 38,527
Local Time: 01:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lancemc View Post
Be more condescending about it.
Sure thing:


Pitchfork: Album Reviews: Radiohead: The King of Limbs
lazarus is offline  
Old 04-04-2011, 11:37 AM   #517
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
nielsgov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 8,651
Local Time: 10:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catman View Post
so while the songs themselves aren't bad, the record as a whole doesn't seem to measure up to the sum of its parts.
I disagree completely with this. I think the flow of the album is extremely good and while there aren't as many outstanding songs on TKOL as on most Radiohead albums I feel that the flow and cohesiveness compensate that (partly). But to each their own I guess.
nielsgov is offline  
Old 04-04-2011, 11:39 AM   #518
The Male
 
LemonMelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hollywoo
Posts: 66,140
Local Time: 01:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nielsgov View Post
I disagree completely with this. I think the flow of the album is extremely good and while there aren't as many outstanding songs on TKOL as on most Radiohead albums I feel that the flow and cohesiveness compensate that (partly). But to each their own I guess.
Yeah, I feel the exact opposite of Catman. Which isn't to say that I consider the album to be perfection defined or anything, but it's pretty clear that the album flows brilliantly. It's the individual songs that leave something to be desired when viewed in the greater context of Radiohead's discography.
__________________


Now.
LemonMelon is online now  
Old 04-04-2011, 02:20 PM   #519
Blue Crack Supplier
 
lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 38,527
Local Time: 01:39 AM
Well I think he's right about the attention to detail at the expense of the overall quality, whether it be of the songs themselves or the album as a whole. So it depends what you mean by Big Picture. It's a dynamic aural experience, but the overall weight isnt there.
lazarus is offline  
Old 04-04-2011, 03:31 PM   #520
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
iron yuppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,567
Local Time: 03:39 AM
I really don't know why discussion about this album keeps coming back to the idea of standout songs. Maybe it's symptomatic of the current milieu in which almost everything is conceptualized as a 99-cent (or whatever the hell they are charging now) iTunes download rather than a unified piece of music, but to me it's fairly clear that the band was not trying to produce immediately-gripping songs. It's not as though I go around humming songs from Bowie's Low, but that doesn't mean that the album is some kind of failure, either. I think that the same applies to KoL.
iron yuppie is offline  
Old 04-04-2011, 05:06 PM   #521
The Male
 
LemonMelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hollywoo
Posts: 66,140
Local Time: 01:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iron yuppie View Post
It's not as though I go around humming songs from Bowie's Low
You don't think Be My Wife and Sound And Vision are catchy? Not exactly musique concrete there.

But I'm splitting hairs. I just don't have much use for any of the album's tracks individually. If I'm listening to King of Limbs, I'm fucking listening to King of Limbs. All of it. But I don't get excited when I hear Lotus Flower on our local indie station because it's not anything special in and of itself. With In Rainbows, I felt I could do both.
__________________


Now.
LemonMelon is online now  
Old 04-04-2011, 05:07 PM   #522
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Catman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 3,519
Local Time: 03:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazarus View Post
Well I think he's right about the attention to detail at the expense of the overall quality, whether it be of the songs themselves or the album as a whole. So it depends what you mean by Big Picture. It's a dynamic aural experience, but the overall weight isnt there.
Yeah, my comment was more directed towards the songs themselves. I suppose a more accurate assessment would be that the individual songs fail to measure up more than the sum of their respective parts.


...or I just don't "get it"
Catman is offline  
Old 04-14-2011, 09:40 AM   #523
Blue Crack Addict
 
U2Fanatic4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: nowhere..........man
Posts: 20,254
Local Time: 04:39 AM
boohiss..

Radiohead rule out releasing 'Kings Of Limbs' sequel | News | NME.COM
U2Fanatic4ever is offline  
Old 04-14-2011, 09:44 AM   #524
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
iron yuppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,567
Local Time: 03:39 AM
What really struck me about that article was this sidebar: Coldplay fans are 'least likely to have sex on a first date' | News | NME.COM
iron yuppie is offline  
Old 04-14-2011, 09:49 AM   #525
Blue Crack Addict
 
U2Fanatic4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: nowhere..........man
Posts: 20,254
Local Time: 04:39 AM
^
__________________

U2Fanatic4ever is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com