toscano
Refugee
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
- Messages
- 2,032
Good points.
I don't agree.
Doesn't matter if you agree, it's my opinion.
Good points.
I don't agree.
This thread is comedy gold. EYKIW delivers once again!
Thanks. You seem to be one of the very few knowledgeable and objective music fans on this forum that can admit that.
ain't it tho.. And I got sucked in once again..
I'd never heard of Rush till I came to this forum. I've never heard a song of theirs and not one of my friends has ever spoken of them. Don't think this thread is making me rush off to listen to em either....
what a pointless post.
thanks. I found it fit in very well in this thread.
elitist.
I can distinctly recall a thread in which about 90% of the posters agreed that Bono was a better singer than Freddie Mercury...
.
No, you couldn't. Why? Because, technically speaking, at least, Geddy Lee is a better bassist than Adam Clayton. Alex Lifeson is a better guitarist than The Edge. And Neil Peart is a better drummer than Larry Mullen Jr. BY A MILE. This is not debatable.
That's what I meant by "ultimate musicianship."
the showMANship thread... that was GOLD
RUSH vs MOZART
Surely you mean showGAYship™
Do you WANT this thread to get closed?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Hmm lemme think...!
I honestly don't know why you bother. When I said comedy gold, I meant your posts too!
they are the only band i know of that has u2 beat as being around the longest without any lineup changes, breakups, etc.
Difference is...u2 have done it from (for the most part) the VERY top of the sucsess tree. Rush have never been subjected to the same fame or pressure that U2 have.
Lets face facts, save for about a handfull of people....no one on this site gives a shit about Rush!
^ he is one scary dude.. what's that on top of his head? a beaver?
have you been keeping track?
We should totally do an awards show