corianderstem
Blue Crack Distributor
CDs are part of my decor.
Not to dive into digital music formats headfirst and confuse everyone here, but to lay it out for you, the tradeoff isn't between physical, good quality music vs. digital, wishy washy crappy quality at all.
An MP3 encoded at 192 kb/s variable bitrate is almost indistinguishable from CD quality. 320 kb/s and you won't notice any difference.
If you think digital music sounds shitty on decent speakers, you sure stole a hell a lot of 128 kb/s music from Limewire back in the day.
Quite the opposite. We are back in 1950s/1960s land, where singles are the norm and cohesive LP-style albums are the rarity.
Digital music, and the mix-and-match ease of the playlist, have created a new world for singles. Look at iTunes. Pricing is now a la carte: you don't buy a shitty Paul McCartney album and get 9 filler tracks and 2 singles...you just buy the 2 singles.
I don't, really.Let's just say you don't know me well at all
On the wall opposite my CDs, I've got a space cleared for a shelf on which to display The Head Of Lazarus.
I have a great plan for how to artfully light it, too.
Someday....
I don't, really.
Also, I challenge anyone to mount a decent rationale for having physical media back in terms of CDs. CDs were ALWAYS shitty. Cracked, cheap-ass plastic cases, scratches that didn't add character, age, or personality to your copy of an album (they just broke it), tiny album art that may as well have been on postage stamps. Scaled back, tiny liner notes that eventually were reduced to two-sided cardboard wafers or shitty paper.
If you want to get lovey-dovey nostalgic about physical media, then by all means, let's wax nostalgic about records. The warm, crackely sound. The huge canvas for beautiful album art. The personality your personal copy of an LP would develop over time. Only you had a record that sounded exactly like that, due to gradual wear and pops and clicks.
Danny Boy said:Honestly, though, I don't know why more bands haven't gone to putting out a track or two every couple of months instead of sticking to the three-year album cycle or whatever. I thought Radiohead was going that way with Hairy Patch and Twisted Words, but that sort of dried up. I think it would be more interesting to hear different sounds that bands are working on in short intervals than a collection of 10-12 songs that all sort of sound alike every few years. Maybe the end of physical formats will break them out of that "album" mindset, and we'll end up getting more musical variety in the long run.
aww yeah.