WikiLeaks largest classified military leak - Page 9 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-03-2010, 02:21 PM   #121
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
mama cass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,262
Local Time: 01:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hiphop View Post
well, don´t forget "these people" are sending young men to war each and every day. "these people" are taking their cut from billions of arms sales every year. someone else does the killing for them.

will reveal double standards? that´s what i call positive thinking. what world is it you think we live in.. of course there are double standards. "these people" will get away with everything, they can command to murder anyone they fucking want as long as they don´t have dirt on their hands personally. and in the very unlikely case no one else (read: intelligence agency or mafia or hitman) does the killing for them, they bribe their way out of trouble.
yeah of course i know what world we live in, a world where double standards is the rule, and of course i know they won't be held accountable because they rarely are, but it's nice to think they could be lol

it's just now they've come out in the open and made such comments publicly and personally and blatantly revealed their true colours, i would've hoped there would be some justice, i'm not holding my breath but i can have a tiny grain of hope can't i? lol!!!
__________________

__________________
mama cass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 02:34 PM   #122
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
hiphop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: in the jungle
Posts: 7,410
Local Time: 02:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mama cass View Post
yeah of course i know what world we live in, a world where double standards is the rule, and of course i know they won't be held accountable because they rarely are, but it's nice to think they could be lol

it's just now they've come out in the open and made such comments publicly and personally and blatantly revealed their true colours, i would've hoped there would be some justice, i'm not holding my breath but i can have a tiny grain of hope can't i? lol!!!
justice? well you could write a letter to the ICC expressing your concern

ICC - International Criminal Court : Home
__________________

__________________
hiphop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 04:13 AM   #123
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
mobvok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: boom clap
Posts: 4,427
Local Time: 05:24 PM
Interesting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Guardian online chat
rszopa
Annoying as it may be, the DDoS seems to be good publicity (if anything, it adds to your credibility). So is getting kicked out of AWS. Do you agree with this statement? Were you planning for it?
Thank you for doing what you are doing.

Julian Assange:
Since 2007 we have been deliberately placing some of our servers in jurisdictions that we suspected suffered a free speech deficit inorder to separate rhetoric from reality. Amazon was one of these cases.
Give the Wikileaks team points for comprehensive planning. Joe Lieberman can reliably be counted on to be a douche.
__________________
mobvok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 11:52 AM   #124
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 18,708
Local Time: 06:24 PM
I find it interesting that people outside the U.S. are more supportive of these leaks than those in the U.S. are. I hear people here in the States complaining a lot as of late about how we need more transparency, there's so much suspicion about what our government is really doing behind closed doors on all sorts of topics, and we always demand a "right to know" as a result. Now we're getting this information, and all of a sudden Assange is a bad person here in many people's eyes. Why the contradiction? Isn't he giving us what we wanted/demanded? And why are we so bothered by these leaks, whereas other parts of the world see them as a good thing?

So far it doesn't sound like anything truly earth-shattering has been revealed through the leaks that we've seen/heard about, but as time goes on I've no doubt that'll change. Like I said before, I understand, in the interests of national security, there are some things that need to have some secrecy about them so that any "enemies" don't find out our plans (though many times who our "enemy" is isn't clear at all, so that doesn't always work as an argument). But if something we or any other country is doing or has done has contributed to more suffering, or is illegal, or whatever, sorry, I think that should be brought into the open and the people involved should be exposed for whatever horrible things they did to others.

Angela
__________________
Moonlit_Angel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 04:38 PM   #125
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
mama cass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,262
Local Time: 01:24 AM
Moonlit_Angel, there is a massive hate campaign against Assange/Wikileaks in the US which is probably influencing people - it's pretty scary to see from this side of the pond...

this doesn't appear to be the case so much over here and some of the regular press are the ones actually publishing the leaks, there are news items on the televised news, not from an anti-wikileaks perspective, but just your normal news reporting... although France is starting to get vocal against wikileaks, possibly due to its strict privacy laws, i don't know...

disturbing to hear that paypal has now banned the wikileaks acount...

in contrast though, Switzerland has rejected international pressure and is still providing wikileaks with a website...
__________________
mama cass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 06:30 PM   #126
The Fly
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 131
Local Time: 07:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mama cass View Post
Moonlit_Angel, there is a massive hate campaign against Assange/Wikileaks in the US which is probably influencing people - it's pretty scary to see from this side of the pond...

this doesn't appear to be the case so much over here and some of the regular press are the ones actually publishing the leaks, there are news items on the televised news, not from an anti-wikileaks perspective, but just your normal news reporting... although France is starting to get vocal against wikileaks, possibly due to its strict privacy laws, i don't know...

disturbing to hear that paypal has now banned the wikileaks acount...

in contrast though, Switzerland has rejected international pressure and is still providing wikileaks with a website...
I don't think its disturbing at all that people hate this thief. Stop stealing what doesn't belong to you! People in Europe probably overlook it because of their anti-US feelings.
__________________
adam4bono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 08:00 PM   #127
Refugee
 
The_Pac_Mule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,338
Local Time: 08:24 PM
So now Wikileaks is losing all its funding. Good.

Quote:
I find it interesting that people outside the U.S. are more supportive of these leaks than those in the U.S. are.
Quote:
People in Europe probably overlook it because of their anti-US feelings.
Of course, they're all looking for something to feed their anti-U.S. sentiment.

Quote:
I hear people here in the States complaining a lot as of late about how we need more transparency, there's so much suspicion about what our government is really doing behind closed doors on all sorts of topics, and we always demand a "right to know" as a result. Now we're getting this information, and all of a sudden Assange is a bad person here in many people's eyes. Why the contradiction? Isn't he giving us what we wanted/demanded? And why are we so bothered by these leaks, whereas other parts of the world see them as a good thing?
I hear those kinds of comments about demanding more government transparency very rarely. When I do, it's usually coming from people who think the government is lying and covering up EVERYTHING (JFK, 9/11, etc.) so I don't listen to them anyways. Personally, one of the many reasons I (and probably many others) am bothered by wikileaks is because all this information is coming from a guy who isn't even an American, let alone a member of our government. He's simply a self-righteous prick. He doesn't care what happens to America because of anything he releases. He's just feeding anti-American sentiment, which I really don't think the world needs more of. Which brings me to my other point, that this actually DOES bother many other countries, particularly in the Middle-East. Now we know that countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Libya don't want a nuclear Iran just as much as we do, and even support pre-emptive strikes if it comes to it. I'm sure they're all REAL happy with us now that Iran now knows this! Somebody tell me why the hell this information needed to be leaked? It's certainly reassuring for us, but now diplomatic relations all across the middle-east are going to suffer. Way to go jackass!

Quote:
But if something we or any other country is doing or has done has contributed to more suffering, or is illegal, or whatever, sorry, I think that should be brought into the open and the people involved should be exposed for whatever horrible things they did to others.
So far wikileaks has yet to truly do that.


Quote:
disturbing to hear that paypal has now banned the wikileaks acount...
How is that disturbing? They're engaging in illegal activies, why would they get some sort of free pass? My youtube account got deleted when I posted U2 music videos
__________________
The_Pac_Mule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 01:58 AM   #128
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
hiphop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: in the jungle
Posts: 7,410
Local Time: 02:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Pac_Mule View Post
Of course, they're all looking for something to feed their anti-U.S. sentiment.
You don´t get it. I´m European and don´t have anti-U.S. sentiments. I have anti-corruption and anti-crime sentiments. I had anti Bush-sentiments when he still was in office, and probably have anti-Palin sentiments since she confuses north with south korea. But hey, anti-U.S.? Absolutely not. Many Americans have more anti-U.S. sentiments than I do - i.e. the mothers of the young men who died in Iraq. Most Europeans have more anti-E.U. sentiments than Americans, because of the neo-liberal policies the E.U. establishes. Look at all the protests in europe. This is not anti-U.S. it has nothing to do with America, just with the corrupt European politicians cutting social and education budgets while "bailing out" the banks, deportation flights for asylum seekers etc.

If you read any of the cables, you will find out that there are as many shady actions by Europeans, Turkish or Russian politicians as by American politicians. Read the cables on Putin or Merkel.

This whole bashment absolutely reminds me of Watergate. I remember how the authors of the articles at Washington Post were getting bashed. The dirty little plots the secret services played (i.e. the one with the toilet on the airport). People who are just a tiny little bit intelligent know how corrupt, criminal thiefs of the government and its administration want to put dirt on those who expose their crimes. How they pressure newspapers to withhold publishing by threatening them with lawsuits. In the case of Watergate it didn´t help: later, the authors of Watergate got the Pulitzer prize.

Fact is that this is NOT about Assange and if he is allowed to publish this etc etc, but it is about the information in the cables. The content of cables is what should be discussed, not if Assange is allowed to publish those cables.

It´s amazing so many people on this forum are foolish enough to jump into the discussion about Assange, but completely forget to read or discuss the content of the cables. Of course, this is strategy.

On another note, most of the cables aren´t top top secret and only President, admin and NSA, CIA know about the facts. More than 1,000,000 Americans, including the army, can access the system they were stored at.
__________________
hiphop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 02:07 AM   #129
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
hiphop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: in the jungle
Posts: 7,410
Local Time: 02:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Pac_Mule View Post
Which brings me to my other point, that this actually DOES bother many other countries, particularly in the Middle-East. Now we know that countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Libya don't want a nuclear Iran just as much as we do, and even support pre-emptive strikes if it comes to it.
Yes, and this information surprised me. It speaks FOR the U.S., not against the U.S. If the content of this cable is true, we now know that the U.S. isn´t completely lunatic (like they are with Iraq, need I remind you of the stockpiles of WMD there) and stands alone, but that the U.S. gets pressure from some of the Arab world (nice countries like Saudi Arabia, where people get their hands hacked off) to attack Iran.

Indeed, it is an interesting read. It´s also interesting to know that Ahmadinejad wanted free press in Iran but got slapped by another guy in those religious meetings (?) for mentioning this.
__________________
hiphop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 02:20 AM   #130
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
hiphop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: in the jungle
Posts: 7,410
Local Time: 02:24 AM
"U.S. soldiers in Iraq who try to read about the Wikileaks disclosures—or read coverage of them in mainstream news sites—on unclassified networks get a page warning them that they're about to break the law.

The federal government seems to have lost its mind in a manic game of internet whack-a-mole aimed at getting the Wikileaks State Department cables thrown down the memory hole: First, Sen. Joe Lieberman successfully nudged Amazon into kicking the site off its servers. Then the Library of Congress blocked the site for all employees and users of its computer terminals. Now we learn that the State Department is warning prospective hires that if they write about Wikileaks on Twitter or Facebook, they might not get that job. And now Gawker has learned that military installations in Iraq are trying to keep soldiers from reading about Wikileaks.

A tipster wrote to tell us that "the Army's unclassified, NIPRNET network in Iraq has blocked every major news website because of the Wikileaks issue," going on to say that Foxnews.com, CNN.com, MSNBC.com, the Huffington Post, and a variety of other sites are blocked on the Army's unclassified network."

http://gawker.com/5705639/us-militar...ding-wikileaks

Hey, what was the difference between China and the U.S. when it comes to censoring? Ummm.. I can´t remember. The regime bares its teeth..
__________________
hiphop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 05:28 AM   #131
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
mama cass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,262
Local Time: 01:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Pac_Mule View Post
So now Wikileaks is losing all its funding. Good.
no, no, it's not "losing all its funding" - where did you read that? lol - i'm sure donors will find other ways of giving to wikileaks, paypal is just one convenient method, that's all
__________________
mama cass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 05:36 AM   #132
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
mama cass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,262
Local Time: 01:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam4bono View Post
People in Europe probably overlook it because of their anti-US feelings.
lol

you should read up on it a bit more - the leaks aren't just about the US you know...

some of us value freedom of information and that kind of thing...

thought this was interesting:

Quote:
Here's what Ron Paul told Fox Business yesterday:
“In a free society we're supposed to know the truth,” Paul said. “In a society where truth becomes treason, then we're in big trouble. And now, people who are revealing the truth are getting into trouble for it.”
“This whole notion that Assange, who's an Australian, that we want to prosecute him for treason. I mean, aren't they jumping to a wild conclusion?” he added. “This is media, isn't it? I mean, why don't we prosecute The New York Times or anybody that releases this?”
__________________
mama cass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 10:06 AM   #133
Refugee
 
AliEnvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,320
Local Time: 12:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadiens1131 View Post
Governments are far behind the internet age, and when their dirty laundry is aired like this for all to see, you can bet heads will roll internally to get their protocals updated.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AliEnvy View Post
Isn't it more likely that the internet will be more heavily regulated and policed?
Here we go.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hiphop View Post
"U.S. soldiers in Iraq who try to read about the Wikileaks disclosures—or read coverage of them in mainstream news sites—on unclassified networks get a page warning them that they're about to break the law.

The federal government seems to have lost its mind in a manic game of internet whack-a-mole aimed at getting the Wikileaks State Department cables thrown down the memory hole: First, Sen. Joe Lieberman successfully nudged Amazon into kicking the site off its servers. Then the Library of Congress blocked the site for all employees and users of its computer terminals. Now we learn that the State Department is warning prospective hires that if they write about Wikileaks on Twitter or Facebook, they might not get that job. And now Gawker has learned that military installations in Iraq are trying to keep soldiers from reading about Wikileaks.

A tipster wrote to tell us that "the Army's unclassified, NIPRNET network in Iraq has blocked every major news website because of the Wikileaks issue," going on to say that Foxnews.com, CNN.com, MSNBC.com, the Huffington Post, and a variety of other sites are blocked on the Army's unclassified network."

U.S. Military in Iraq Tries to Intimidate Soldiers Into Not Reading Wikileaks

Hey, what was the difference between China and the U.S. when it comes to censoring? Ummm.. I can´t remember. The regime bares its teeth..
How long before the rest of us are breaking the law?
__________________
AliEnvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 03:47 PM   #134
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: nyc
Posts: 51,764
Local Time: 07:24 PM
Being a "whistleblower" and exposing wrong doing by governments and corporations is all fine and dandy.

Releasing details on secret deals and cooperation by governments, details about military operations, etc. is irresponsible and hurts diplomacy and puts lives at risk; both directly and indirectly.

I blame manning more than assange, who's nothing more than a giant douche.

I also blame the US government. How is it so easy to get these files out? I can't go to a webpage without my employer knowing what im doing. How was manning able to get this stuff out for so long?

The US government needs to do a better job of friggin IT security, and they need to prosecute manning to the fullest extent of the law available, mostly so that anyone else who might want to try and do this thinks twice.

Whatever we can do to make life harder for wikileaks themselves as well is fine with me.
__________________
Headache in a Suitcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 04:18 PM   #135
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Canadiens1131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,359
Local Time: 08:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Headache in a Suitcase View Post
I also blame the US government. How is it so easy to get these files out? I can't go to a webpage without my employer knowing what im doing. How was manning able to get this stuff out for so long?

The US government needs to do a better job of friggin IT security, and they need to prosecute manning to the fullest extent of the law available, mostly so that anyone else who might want to try and do this thinks twice.
I believe Manning was a low-level intelligence officer, and therefore had access to the relevant database.

None of the documents released were highly classified, nor do they really tell us much that we don't already know, nor do they directly put lives in jeopardy. They are just embarrassing for the U.S. Government and diplomatic corps, since it's the equivalent of having one's dirty laundry aired for the entire world to see, or one's diary read aloud in class.

The Apache-vs-Journalists in a van "d'oh" moment was much more scandalous than this shit, Headache.
__________________

__________________
Canadiens1131 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com