Videotaping The Police - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-21-2010, 11:28 AM   #1
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,994
Local Time: 12:36 PM
Videotaping The Police

Does government have the right to prevent citizens from recording the police?

abcnews.com
Growing Number of Prosecutions for Videotaping the Police
Prosecutions Draw Attention to Influence of Witness Videos
By RAY SANCHEZ

July 19, 2010—

That Anthony Graber broke the law in early March is indisputable. He raced his Honda motorcycle down Interstate 95 in Maryland at 80 mph, popping a wheelie, roaring past cars and swerving across traffic lanes.

But it wasn't his daredevil stunt that has the 25-year-old staff sergeant for the Maryland Air National Guard facing the possibility of 16 years in prison. For that, he was issued a speeding ticket. It was the video that Graber posted on YouTube one week later -- taken with his helmet camera -- of a plainclothes state trooper cutting him off and drawing a gun during the traffic stop near Baltimore.

In early April, state police officers raided Graber's parents' home in Abingdon, Md. They confiscated his camera, computers and external hard drives. Graber was indicted for allegedly violating state wiretap laws by recording the trooper without his consent.

Arrests such as Graber's are becoming more common along with the proliferation of portable video cameras and cell-phone recorders. Videos of alleged police misconduct have become hot items on the Internet. YouTube still features Graber's encounter along with numerous other witness videos. "The message is clearly, 'Don't criticize the police,'" said David Rocah, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland who is part of Graber's defense team. "With these charges, anyone who would even think to record the police is now justifiably in fear that they will also be criminally charged."

Carlos Miller, a Miami journalist who runs the blog "Photography Is Not a Crime," said he has documented about 10 arrests since he started keeping track in 2007. Miller himself has been arrested twice for photographing the police. He won one case on appeal, he said, while the other was thrown out after the officer twice failed to appear in court.

"They're just regular citizens with a cell-phone camera who happen to come upon a situation," Miller said. "If cops are doing their jobs, they shouldn't worry."

The ACLU of Florida filed a First Amendment lawsuit last month on behalf of a model who was arrested February 2009 in Boynton Beach. Fla. Her crime: videotaping an encounter between police officers and her teenage son at a movie theater. Prosecutors refused to file charges against Sharron Tasha Ford and her son.


Videotaping as a Tool for Citizens

"The police have cameras in their cars. I watch cops on TV," Ford said. "I'm very hurt by what happened. A lot of people are being abused by police in the same way."

Ford's lawyer, James Green, called videotaping "probably the most effective way to protect citizens against police officers who exaggerate or lie."

"Judges and juries want to believe law enforcement," he said. "They want to believe police officers and unless you have credible evidence to contradict police officers, it's often very difficult to get judges or juries to believe the word of a citizen over a police officer."

In Palm Beach County, Fla., Greenacres resident Peter Ballance, 63, who has Asperger's syndrome and has to record conversations to help his memory, settled a civil lawsuit for $100,000 last year. In August 2005, police officers tackled and arrested Ballance for refusing to turn off his tape recorder.

"You know what," said the officer, according to court documents, "I still don't want that recording device on."

"Well, it's on," Ballance replied.

"It is a third-degree felony," the cop said. "If you want to push it, you can go to jail for it."

"Well, I'm pushing it now," Ballance said.

Ballance snapped pictures of the officers. One of the cops delivered a blindside tackle. Ballance had to be treated for injuries and cardiac symptoms at a hospital on the way to the county jail. At the hospital, officers refused to let Ballance use his recorders to communicate with doctors, court papers said.

In Portsmouth, N.H., earlier this month, Adam Whitman, 20, and his brother were charged with wiretapping, a felony in the state for videotaping police on the Fourth of July when they were called to a party and ended up arresting 20 people, many for underage drinking.

A police spokesman told ABCNews.com that the wiretapping charges were being dropped.

Witness Videos on the Rise

Across the country, arrests such as these highlight the growing role of witness video in law enforcement. A dozen states require all parties to consent before a recording is made if there is a "reasonable expectation of privacy." Virginia and New York require one-party consent. Only in Massachusetts and Illinois is it illegal for people to make an audio recording of people without their consent.

"The argument is, 'Well, can a police officer beside the highway have a private conversation with somebody that they pull over?'" said Joseph Cassilly, the Harford County prosecutor handling Graber's case.

Cassilly added, "Suppose a police officer pulled you over and he wanted to have a talk with you. 'Sir, I smell alcohol on your breath. Can you talk to me about how much you've had to drink? Would you want somebody else to stop by and record that and put it on the Internet?"

Rocah of the ACLU disagreed. "It's not that recording any conversation is illegal without consent. It's that recording a private conversation is illegal without consent," he said. "So then the question is, 'Are the words of a police officer spoken on duty, in uniform, in public a 'private conversation.' And every court that has ever considered that question has said that they are not."

Rocah said actual wiretapping prosecutions, though rare, are happening more frequently. But intimidation with the threat of arrest for taping the police is much more common.

"Prosecution is only the most extreme end of a continuum of police and official intimidation and there's a lot of intimidation that goes on and has been going on short of prosecution," he said. "It's far more frequent for an officer to just say, 'You can't record or give me your camera or give me your cell phone and if you don't I'm going to arrest you. Very few people want to test the veracity of that threat and so comply. It's much more difficult to document, much more prevalent and equally improper."

New Video, Old Debate

In many jurisdictions, the police themselves record encounters with the public with dashboard cameras in their cars.

"Police and governmental recording of citizens is becoming more pervasive and to say that government can record you but you can't record, it speaks volumes about the mentality of people in government," Rocah said. "It's supposed to be the other way around: They work for us; we don't work for them."

Graber's YouTube video, meanwhile, has helped renew the old debate about whether government has a right to keep residents from recording the police. There is even an "I support Anthony Graber and his right to freedom of expression" Facebook page with close to 600 friends.

"Suffice it to say that our client is terrified at the prospect of these criminal charges," Rocah said.
__________________

__________________
MrsSpringsteen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2010, 02:11 PM   #2
has a
 
kramwest1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not a toliet wall
Posts: 6,939
Local Time: 11:36 AM
This drives me crazy. We are all on any number of cameras everywhere at any time. But, an average citizen records something and suddenly the same right isn't there?

If you are in a public place versus private property, you ABSOLUTELY have the right to film or photograph anyone/anything in that same public place. Now, you need to understand the definition of a public place, but generally it is fairly simple--streets/roads and most sidewalks are public places. Some municipalities have laws regarding how you are able to record/photograph in public places--for instance you may need a permit if you use a tripod, but just holding a camera is fine.

I've had a few run-ins with security guards about photographing, but thankfully never the police. The security guards have generally said that I had no right to be photographing their building or the people who may be entering/leaving. This is bullshit if you are standing on a public sidewalk, and I have been more than happy to inform the security guards that at least in Minneapolis (where I've had the incidents) the city owns at least the first 10 feet of concrete from the curb inward--Public Place. They can come stand in front of you and block you, but if they touch you, that's assault.

Anyway, no law enforcement officer should be concerned about being recorded. There should be little doubt that the officer is performing their duty properly and any recording would only verify that.



I hope people will be as passionate about this right as they are about gun rights.
__________________

__________________
Bread & Circuses
kramwest1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2010, 04:45 PM   #3
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Jive Turkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,646
Local Time: 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kramwest1 View Post
I hope people will be as passionate about this right as they are about gun rights.
This

I would say its a much more important right than the one to own a gun
__________________
Jive Turkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2010, 07:00 PM   #4
Refugee
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,593
Local Time: 01:36 PM
i always try to avoid having dipshit tourists taking my picture/video when im out in the field just because i dont want myself ending up on someone's facebook page or wherever. i wouldnt say anything, but if i see them aiming ill turn around or walk behind something, just to mess up their shot.

on the other hand, if you come through my federal inspection area with a camera, you better put that shit away and fast.
__________________
bigjohn2441 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2010, 09:19 PM   #5
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Jive Turkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,646
Local Time: 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn2441 View Post
i always try to avoid having dipshit tourists taking my picture/video when im out in the field just because i dont want myself ending up on someone's facebook page or wherever. i wouldnt say anything, but if i see them aiming ill turn around or walk behind something, just to mess up their shot.
That's fair. Even I do that when I see someone trying to take a photo of me at a family function
__________________
Jive Turkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2010, 11:56 PM   #6
has a
 
kramwest1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not a toliet wall
Posts: 6,939
Local Time: 11:36 AM
It's not illegal to photobomb!
__________________
Bread & Circuses
kramwest1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2010, 09:12 AM   #7
has a
 
kramwest1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not a toliet wall
Posts: 6,939
Local Time: 11:36 AM
Here's another odd story, too.

2 Norwegian Journalists Arrested For Snapping Photos Of Chelsea Clinton's Likely Wedding Site

You do need to know where private property begins.
__________________
Bread & Circuses
kramwest1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2010, 05:45 PM   #8
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
BluRmGrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leather Heaven
Posts: 7,808
Local Time: 01:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kramwest1 View Post
I hope people will be as passionate about this right as they are about gun rights.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jive Turkey View Post
I would say its a much more important right than the one to own a gun


While I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm certain there are plenty of things our government does (particularly federal government) that are, if not outright illegal, certainly questionable. To think that a citizen filming a law enforcement officer in the course of their duties could be considered an arrestable offense genuinely worries me. 'Absolute power corrupts absolutely'... sound familiar?
__________________

__________________
BluRmGrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com