eh hem...
Didn't Trumpski say at one point that he'd get rid of Mueller if Mueller started digging into the finances?
eh hem...
You are looking at an anomalous case.
Why not stack the Democratic caucus with 10 such Manchins who will then have the power to hold the party hostage to their views much like what we are seeing from the Tea Party?
Why is it that you guys keep insisting that this is what Democrats should do but there is no suggestion that anybody on the right, not a voter and not a politician "meet halfway" their progressives in San Francisco?
There's no need for it. The conservatives have the majority in the House and the Senate. They have the power. So why move?
Yes, because that's where the bodies are buried.Didn't Trumpski say at one point that he'd get rid of Mueller if Mueller started digging into the finances?
Didn't Trumpski say at one point that he'd get rid of Mueller if Mueller started digging into the finances?
Let's be honest, he can be pretty annoying.
You want to nominate only pro-life candidates who will then only vote for pro-life SCOTUS nominees to hold judicial positions for life so that they have the votes needed to overturn Roe v Wade.
Hello?
I don't think that because someone calls themselves pro-life (especially a democrat in the Deep South) they will then only vote for pro-life SCOTUS nominees or actively work to overturn Roe v Wade. It's one thing if they're openly campaigning on overturning Roe v Wade, but if they're simply stating that they personally believe abortion is morally troublesome and should be reduced?
Why is it that you guys keep insisting that this is what Democrats should do but there is no suggestion that anybody on the right, not a voter and not a politician "meet halfway" their progressives in San Francisco?
It's truthfully really frustrating.
anitram, it does seem that you are indeed holding Supreme Court nominations about abortion to the gold standard of any senator's role in the government. That is not their only responsibility.
well, here it is. this is the only thing that matters to some.
Moore spokeswoman brings up anchor's baby - CNN Video
Wow. Absolutely despicable. Way, way, way over the line. One of the most crass displays I've ever seen from a campaign spokesperson. Congratulating her on her baby was fine, but every word after that...completely inappropriate.
But yeah. Again, there's a reason they're pounding abortion, and Moore's supporters will love it.
Are women really aborting babies at 8 months?