The Big Three Automakers? - Page 3 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 11-15-2008, 02:20 AM   #31
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Lila64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ♥Set List Lane♥
Posts: 52,710
Local Time: 09:15 PM
I watched Bill Maher tonight. One of his guests was Ashton Kutcher, who had an interesting idea. Let the oil companies bail out the big 3
__________________

__________________
Lila64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2008, 01:11 PM   #32
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,693
Local Time: 10:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lila64 View Post
I watched Bill Maher tonight. One of his guests was Ashton Kutcher, who had an interesting idea. Let the oil companies bail out the big 3

Yeah, then we'd never get any true innovation out of them as far as becoming less dependent on oil...
__________________

__________________
BVS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2008, 04:15 PM   #33
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,984
Local Time: 11:15 PM
It's not just working directly for the auto industry, it's also all the affiliated and auxiliary industries. The ripple effect would be huge. With the economy and unemployment going the way they are, I think there's no choice.
__________________
MrsSpringsteen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2008, 05:05 PM   #34
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Se7en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: all around in the dark - everywhere
Posts: 3,531
Local Time: 11:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UberBeaver View Post
lol.

Someone said, i think $73/hr. $73 x 40 x 52 = $151,840.

Ford CEO Paid $39.1 Million for Four Months
t r u t h o u t | Ford CEO Paid $39.1 Million for Four Months

39,000,000 x 3 = $117,000,000

$117,000,000 / $151,840 = 770 employees.

THOSE GODDAMN GREEDY UNION FUCKS IS TAKING ALL THE MONEY!!!!


Having said all that. Were you serious or being sarcastic? Because the points you make sound sarcastic, but there's a very good chance you're serious. So, I'm just making sure.
there is, in fact, no chance that i was being serious.
__________________
Se7en is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 02:42 PM   #35
Breakdancing Soul Pilgrim
 
UberBeaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: the most serious...douch hammer ever
Posts: 20,318
Local Time: 11:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Se7en View Post
there is, in fact, no chance that i was being serious.
Ok, man. Thanks for clearing that up. You can never really be sure around here.

Lots of if you know what I mean.
__________________
UberBeaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 10:28 AM   #36
Blue Crack Supplier
 
elevated_u2_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: I'm here 'cus I don't want to go home
Posts: 31,694
Local Time: 11:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent Vega View Post
It's the brand. Some people buy cars by name. If their Cadillac was now called Buick they wouldn't be as tied to the company anymore.
Most of those companies got bought by bigger ones and the name was kept for the reason of branding.
Something like Cadilac and Buick I can understand because they make different cars...

Tell me why this is necessary:

The Mercury Milan vs The Ford Fusion, both owned by Ford
__________________
elevated_u2_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 10:36 AM   #37
Breakdancing Soul Pilgrim
 
UberBeaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: the most serious...douch hammer ever
Posts: 20,318
Local Time: 11:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by elevated_u2_fan View Post
Something like Cadilac and Buick I can understand because they make different cars...

Tell me why this is necessary:

The Mercury Milan vs The Ford Fusion, both owned by Ford
One has a vertical grill, one has a horizontal grill. Duh.
__________________
UberBeaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 10:39 AM   #38
Blue Crack Supplier
 
elevated_u2_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: I'm here 'cus I don't want to go home
Posts: 31,694
Local Time: 11:15 PM
lol, good answer!
__________________
elevated_u2_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 03:17 PM   #39
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Vincent Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 6,615
Local Time: 05:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by elevated_u2_fan View Post
Something like Cadilac and Buick I can understand because they make different cars...

Tell me why this is necessary:

The Mercury Milan vs The Ford Fusion, both owned by Ford
I just took two more or less random names because I couldn't think of specific examples. But the premise of branding still stands.
But I guess this crisis might put an end to some of those names, as it costs money to maintain those brands which the car companies don't have. So they are very likely to look closely into which brands are still able to generate income, and the rest will have to go.
__________________
Vincent Vega is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 07:06 PM   #40
Refugee
 
Bluer White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,886
Local Time: 11:15 PM
Reid Unveils Bill to Aid Auto Makers - WSJ.com

Quote:
President-elect Barack Obama said he believes aid for the auto industry is needed but that it should be provided as part of a long-term plan -- not simply as a blank check.

"For the auto industry to completely collapse would be a disaster in this kind of environment," Obama said in a "60 Minutes" interview aired Sunday night on CBS. "So my hope is that over the course of the next week, between the White House and Congress, the discussions are shaped around providing assistance but making sure that that assistance is conditioned on labor, management, suppliers, lenders, all of the stakeholders coming together with a plan -- what does a sustainable U.S. auto industry look like?"
I think the President-Elect was spot on last night on 60 Minutes.

Ideally GM would best be re-organized in bankruptcy. But these aren't exactly stable economic times to digest that tsunami. The problem with Senator Reid's bill is that it does sound like another blank check. All I've heard so far is that top executives making over $200K wouldn't be getting their bonuses. Hmmm....how about removing those executives? What about a serious business plan from these guys?

This Reid bill needs to have serious conditions attached to it. The industry needs open heart surgery and we're trying to put a band-aid on it.
__________________
Bluer White is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 07:10 PM   #41
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
the iron horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: in a glass of CheerWine
Posts: 3,251
Local Time: 11:15 PM
Where in the U.S. Constitution does it say that the Federal Government should bail out (give money) to failing companies?
__________________
the iron horse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 07:16 PM   #42
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30,343
Local Time: 11:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the iron horse View Post
Where in the U.S. Constitution does it say that the Federal Government should bail out (give money) to failing companies?
Do you really need the U.S. Constitution explained to you?

Are you aware that there are many actions taken by the government that are not listed in the Constitution?
__________________
phillyfan26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 10:44 PM   #43
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,693
Local Time: 10:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the iron horse View Post
Where in the U.S. Constitution does it say that the Federal Government should bail out (give money) to failing companies?
Where does it say it can't or shouldn't?
__________________
BVS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 11:06 PM   #44
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
purpleoscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In right wing paranoia
Posts: 7,597
Local Time: 09:15 PM
Today in Investor's Business Daily stock analysis and business news
__________________
purpleoscar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 09:25 AM   #45
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tempe, Az USA
Posts: 12,856
Local Time: 09:15 PM




Quote:
Originally Posted by BonoVoxSupastar View Post
Where does it say it can't or shouldn't?

Mitt says no to the bailout:




Quote:

By MITT ROMNEY
Published: November 18, 2008
Boston



IF General Motors, Ford and Chrysler get the bailout that their chief executives asked for yesterday, you can kiss the American automotive industry goodbye. It won’t go overnight, but its demise will be virtually guaranteed.

Without that bailout, Detroit will need to drastically restructure itself. With it, the automakers will stay the course — the suicidal course of declining market shares, insurmountable labor and retiree burdens, technology atrophy, product inferiority and never-ending job losses. Detroit needs a turnaround, not a check.

I love cars, American cars. I was born in Detroit, the son of an auto chief executive. In 1954, my dad, George Romney, was tapped to run American Motors when its president suddenly died. The company itself was on life support — banks were threatening to deal it a death blow. The stock collapsed. I watched Dad work to turn the company around — and years later at business school, they were still talking about it. From the lessons of that turnaround, and from my own experiences, I have several prescriptions for Detroit’s automakers.

First, their huge disadvantage in costs relative to foreign brands must be eliminated. That means new labor agreements to align pay and benefits to match those of workers at competitors like BMW, Honda, Nissan and Toyota. Furthermore, retiree benefits must be reduced so that the total burden per auto for domestic makers is not higher than that of foreign producers.

That extra burden is estimated to be more than $2,000 per car. Think what that means: Ford, for example, needs to cut $2,000 worth of features and quality out of its Taurus to compete with Toyota’s Avalon. Of course the Avalon feels like a better product — it has $2,000 more put into it. Considering this disadvantage, Detroit has done a remarkable job of designing and engineering its cars. But if this cost penalty persists, any bailout will only delay the inevitable.

Second, management as is must go. New faces should be recruited from unrelated industries — from companies widely respected for excellence in marketing, innovation, creativity and labor relations.

The new management must work with labor leaders to see that the enmity between labor and management comes to an end. This division is a holdover from the early years of the last century, when unions brought workers job security and better wages and benefits. But as Walter Reuther, the former head of the United Automobile Workers, said to my father, “Getting more and more pay for less and less work is a dead-end street.”

You don’t have to look far for industries with unions that went down that road. Companies in the 21st century cannot perpetuate the destructive labor relations of the 20th. This will mean a new direction for the U.A.W., profit sharing or stock grants to all employees and a change in Big Three management culture.

The need for collaboration will mean accepting sanity in salaries and perks. At American Motors, my dad cut his pay and that of his executive team, he bought stock in the company, and he went out to factories to talk to workers directly. Get rid of the planes, the executive dining rooms — all the symbols that breed resentment among the hundreds of thousands who will also be sacrificing to keep the companies afloat.

Investments must be made for the future. No more focus on quarterly earnings or the kind of short-term stock appreciation that means quick riches for executives with options. Manage with an eye on cash flow, balance sheets and long-term appreciation. Invest in truly competitive products and innovative technologies — especially fuel-saving designs — that may not arrive for years. Starving research and development is like eating the seed corn.

Just as important to the future of American carmakers is the sales force. When sales are down, you don’t want to lose the only people who can get them to grow. So don’t fire the best dealers, and don’t crush them with new financial or performance demands they can’t meet.

It is not wrong to ask for government help, but the automakers should come up with a win-win proposition. I believe the federal government should invest substantially more in basic research — on new energy sources, fuel-economy technology, materials science and the like — that will ultimately benefit the automotive industry, along with many others. I believe Washington should raise energy research spending to $20 billion a year, from the $4 billion that is spent today. The research could be done at universities, at research labs and even through public-private collaboration. The federal government should also rectify the imbedded tax penalties that favor foreign carmakers.

But don’t ask Washington to give shareholders and bondholders a free pass — they bet on management and they lost.

The American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk.

In a managed bankruptcy, the federal government would propel newly competitive and viable automakers, rather than seal their fate with a bailout check.

Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, was a candidate for this year’s Republican presidential nomination
__________________

__________________
diamond is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com