Taxing Your Tan - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-09-2010, 11:28 AM   #1
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,881
Local Time: 03:03 PM
Taxing Your Tan

So I am driving to work today and there is quite the uproar beginning to occur around this tanning tax.

Apparently, the case is being made that the tax is racist because it is only taxing white people who are using the tanning services.

Thoughts? Anyone else out there hearing this in their community? Is it fair to tax a service that only a lighter skinned person may use? Would there be an uproar over a tax that targeted a product that African Americans use?
__________________

__________________
Dreadsox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 11:41 AM   #2
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
DrTeeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Q continuum
Posts: 4,770
Local Time: 09:03 PM

Damn socialists are taxing the Sun now?
__________________

__________________
DrTeeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 11:46 AM   #3
Blue Crack Addict
 
Liesje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the dog house
Posts: 19,557
Local Time: 03:03 PM
I've heard of the tanning tax but not that argument. I tan occasionally and don't care if it's taxed.
__________________
Liesje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 11:47 AM   #4
Blue Crack Distributor
 
corianderstem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 63,731
Local Time: 12:03 PM
I haven't heard anyone talk about it, other than John McCain Tweeting Snooki about it.

Then again, I don't know anyone who tans in tanning booths.
__________________
corianderstem is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 11:48 AM   #5
The Fly
 
AlexHamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 89
Local Time: 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadsox View Post
So I am driving to work today and there is quite the uproar beginning to occur around this tanning tax.

Apparently, the case is being made that the tax is racist because it is only taxing white people who are using the tanning services.

Thoughts? Anyone else out there hearing this in their community? Is it fair to tax a service that only a lighter skinned person may use? Would there be an uproar over a tax that targeted a product that African Americans use?

It doesn't "only tax white people." Nowhere in the law does it say that, and there aren't any tanning places that I know of with signs reading, "Only whites allowed."

For the record, I know several Asian and Hispanic people that go tanning. I don't know any black people that do it, but they're certainly free to do so if they wish.

Also, how is the tax implemented? I assume it would be a tax on the business, i.e. the people who own it, who could be of any race. I doubt you swipe a card to pay your tanning tax before the bed turns on.
__________________
AlexHamilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 12:08 PM   #6
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,697
Local Time: 02:03 PM


Great comeback Dreadsox
__________________
BVS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 12:35 PM   #7
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,997
Local Time: 03:03 PM
So not only does Obama hate white people, he also hates white people who are trying to be darker? It's tough to keep up.

'Tan tax' discussions include allegations of reverse racism


But does the argument have any merit? Not remotely said Randall Kennedy, a professor at Harvard Law School specializing in racial conflict and law.

"There is no constitutional problem at all, because a plaintiff would have to show that the government intended to disadvantage a particular group, not simply that the group is disadvantaged in effect," he said.

Kennedy said that this is why courts have upheld a raft of other laws that also happen to have a disproportionate impact on particular groups. For example, laws that impose higher penalties for possession or trafficking of crack cocaine as opposed to powder cocaine resulted in far harsher sentences for African Americans compared to whites. And laws that offer preferential treatment for veterans are much more likely to benefit men than women. But in both cases judges ruled that, because lawmakers did not intend to disadvantage black people or women when drafting those laws, they are legal.

What would it take to prove that President Obama or members of Congress intended to discriminate against white people when they included the tan tax in the health-care law? There would have to be some record of direct or indirect comments by the officials involved, Kennedy said. Or there would have to be no possible alternate reason for adopting the tan tax.

But the levy's supporters argued from the start that it had a dual purpose: to raise funds to cover some of the cost of extending health coverage to the uninsured and to discourage a habit that scientific studies have linked with increased risk of cancer.

"To say that this health rationale was a mere pretext for wanting to stick it to white people is completely implausible," Kennedy said.
__________________
MrsSpringsteen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 01:42 PM   #8
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,499
Local Time: 03:03 PM
now, even Snooki will know the pain of racism.

i guess it's now GTTL. (gym, taxes, tanning, laundry).
__________________
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 01:49 PM   #9
The Fly
 
AlexHamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 89
Local Time: 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
i guess it's now GTTL. (gym, taxes, tanning, laundry).

You owe me a new keyboard!
__________________
AlexHamilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 02:20 PM   #10
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Pearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,653
Local Time: 04:03 PM
Tanning is huge where I live. If there were a tax, I'm sure there would be an uproar.
__________________
Pearl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 02:33 PM   #11
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,499
Local Time: 03:03 PM
this seems like a "sin tax" -- no different than taxes on cigarettes, booze, and (hopefully) HFCS.

deal with it, and the skin cancer.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 03:50 PM   #12
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
maycocksean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Most Important State in the Union
Posts: 4,882
Local Time: 03:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrsSpringsteen View Post
What would it take to prove that President Obama . . . intended to discriminate against white people when they included the tan tax in the health-care law? .
It's all there in his book. Look into it. You will see.
__________________
maycocksean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 04:10 PM   #13
The Fly
 
AlexHamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 89
Local Time: 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by maycocksean View Post
It's all there in his book. Look into it. You will see.
Don't take the bait, don't take the bait...
__________________
AlexHamilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 06:53 PM   #14
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
maycocksean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Most Important State in the Union
Posts: 4,882
Local Time: 03:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexHamilton View Post
Don't take the bait, don't take the bait...
It's not what you think.

It's an inside joke. If you've been inside certain threads over the past week or so, I'm guessing you probably know exactly what I'm referencing.
__________________
maycocksean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 07:09 PM   #15
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 02:03 PM
Seems like a "tan tax" would also disproportionately affect Hoosiers over Floridians, the young over the old or the vain over the humble.

Anyway, I seem to remember a certain presidential candidate promising, " If your family earns less than $250000 a year, you will not see your taxes increased a single dime."

Oh well.
__________________

__________________
INDY500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com