I should perhaps have said there's an even better way to travel into the future: it's called living.
Whatever.
Then. Why. Post. It?
It was a relatively throwaway comment. And not essentially wrong. Just not specific to the usual usage of the term 'time travel'.
Are you gunning for me now or something? I've read far worse rubbish on this forum.
I hope you don't think for a second that that is what I was saying. Surely it is relatively uncontroversial to point out that progress through time as experienced during a normal life on a planet like Earth is still 'travel' of some kind, through time. Accelerated travel by movement at or near light speed, is a difference of degree, not of kind.