Sickening PC Courts Expose Children To Filth! - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 06-23-2009, 08:22 PM   #1
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 09:20 PM
Sickening PC Courts Expose Children To Filth!

Quote:
Eric Duane Mongerson and Sandy Kay Ehlers Mongerson were married for 21 years and had four children. The Georgia Supreme Court has ruled in their divorce case that the children cannot be prohibited from visitation with their now-homosexual father.

The ruling would also put the children in contact with their father's homosexual friends. Matt Barber of Liberty Counsel tells OneNewsNow the courts historically have looked to the best interests of children.

"In this case the court, in order to somehow perpetuate and further the interest of political correctness, has taken what's in the best interest of the child and turned it on its head," he contends.

Barber says there appears to be no consideration for the fact that children are very impressionable and could be harmed from exposure to a homosexual environment.

"Obviously it is not in the best interest of a child to be taken by his father and introduced to a group of people who are engaging in abhorrent sexual behaviors, who are modeling abhorrent sexual behaviors and celebration of that [which is] demonstrably dangerous from a medical, spiritual, and emotional standpoint -- modeling those behaviors for the child," Barber adds.

The Libery Counsel attorney notes that puts the mother in the position of determining how to counsel her children.
Divorce case exposes minors to homosexual environment (OneNewsNow.com)

Having seen similar attitudes explicitly stated here, I thought this could be interesting.
__________________

__________________
A_Wanderer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2009, 08:45 PM   #2
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 03:20 AM
I read the article you posted and the link
I did not see any thing that supported the title of this thread.
__________________

__________________
deep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 12:00 AM   #3
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,641
Local Time: 05:20 AM
I know many on here that would agree with this title...
__________________
BVS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 12:11 AM   #4
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30,343
Local Time: 06:20 AM
How many people here really believe homosexuality is filth and that kids should be protected from their father simply because he's gay? I mean, really, let's be reasonable about those debating here on FYM. I know there are plenty of disagreeable opinions here, but how many really would agree with this Liberty Counsel nut? I think very few.
__________________
phillyfan26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 12:16 AM   #5
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,641
Local Time: 05:20 AM
Besides Joe the Plumber?

Actually I could show you several quotes that align with this thinking, but one I can say has actually changed his view and to that
__________________
BVS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 05:39 AM   #6
Forum Moderator
 
yolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,471
Local Time: 12:20 PM
I suppose from a certain mindset this might get framed as being somewhat of a 'freedom of religion' issue (for the mother).

This decision was certainly a victory for gay parents, however depressingly rudimentary, and that's something to celebrate. But particularly after browsing for a bit more background as well as the text of the decision, my main reaction was, Poor kids, getting so publically caught in the middle and on top of it being used as politicized pawns against their father in this way. Frankly both parents, and especially the mother, sound like spiteful and immature people who, several years on, have never really tried to develop a functional post-divorce relationship for their children's sake.

While the Court overruled the 'no gay acquaintances' restriction--it wasn't actually the case that the father himself couldn't see the kids, rather that he couldn't 'expose' them to any gay acquaintances, whether friends or his partner--their divorce agreement apparently still contains a 'paramour clause,' a rule that neither parent shall ever have anyone s/he's romantically involved with, but not married to, spending the night while the children are in the house. These clauses are more often enforced against gay parents--who of course don't usually have the option of circumventing them by getting married.

As for the "Liberty" Counsel spokesperson, he just sounds despicable.
__________________
yolland [at] interference.com


μελετώ αποτυγχάνειν. -- Διογένης της Σινώπης
yolland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 06:27 AM   #7
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
JanuaryStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: World of Dreams
Posts: 9,159
Local Time: 01:20 PM
I don't see the point in the thread-title here. What that counsel spokesman said, that is to be called filth. Judging other people's sexuality like that? Where does he get the right from? Oh wait, of course he'll have some 'sources' for that, sadly...
__________________
JanuaryStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 02:23 PM   #8
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30,343
Local Time: 06:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanuaryStar View Post
I don't see the point in the thread-title here. What that counsel spokesman said, that is to be called filth. Judging other people's sexuality like that? Where does he get the right from? Oh wait, of course he'll have some 'sources' for that, sadly...
A_Wanderer was being sarcastic.
__________________
phillyfan26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 02:37 PM   #9
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,974
Local Time: 06:20 AM
__________________
MrsSpringsteen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 03:11 PM   #10
Self-righteous bullshitter
 
BoMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Soviet Canuckistan — Socialist paradise
Posts: 16,661
Local Time: 07:20 AM
__________________

BoMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 04:04 PM   #11
Forum Moderator
 
yolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,471
Local Time: 12:20 PM
^ 'I will not' what???
__________________
yolland [at] interference.com


μελετώ αποτυγχάνειν. -- Διογένης της Σινώπης
yolland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 04:05 PM   #12
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Vincent Vega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 6,615
Local Time: 12:20 PM
I must not steal at ULOC.
__________________
Vincent Vega is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 04:10 PM   #13
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 03:20 AM
Uters Land of Chocolate

.
__________________

__________________
deep is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rwanda, 10 years after:'Don't talk to me about justice.' Naya Free Your Mind Archive 8 04-09-2004 01:25 AM
Operation Iraqi Children MrsSpringsteen Free Your Mind Archive 0 04-04-2004 09:42 AM
Amnesty International hiphop Free Your Mind Archive 25 06-14-2003 09:29 PM
Save the Children blocked from IRAQ oktobergirl Free Your Mind Archive 19 04-18-2003 11:07 PM
I have found my candidate!!! Dreadsox Free Your Mind Archive 88 03-09-2003 05:38 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com