Refugee/migrant crisis in Europe

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
"dangling the open borders/free for all carrot" is a little trite...


Is it?

Like you say there have been refugees and migrants crossing the Mediterranean for many, many years. The Syrian war started in 2011, Aleppo was bombed for the first time in late 2011, yet these masses of immigrants trying to reach Western Europe has started when? And is it getting any better since the media got involved on a whole new level a few months ago?

Refugees should be welcomed, there is absolutely no question about that. My issue is the tens of thousands of migrants taking up resources, aid and shelter that was meant for people fleeing a war torn country. There is nothing wrong with migrating for economic reasons either, heck, I moved to a different country myself, but I didn't march up to the border and demanded entrance. I know it's not all that simple and lines do get blurry, but what is happening now is not sustainable and no nation can integrate these massive amounts of people in one go.

And those that will suffer in the end, will be the actual refugees running for their lives because immigration will be nearly impossible in the next little while.




Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
Most of the young Syrian men are probably draft dodgers. Previously, they could pay $2000 to avoid conscription. Given the depletion in the army ranks, they're probably cracking down on the dodgers.

If Germany wants them they should just send a fleet of Lufthansa planes to Izmir, Turkey and airlift them. Same goes for other countries.

I believe there's a EU law stating they need to be physically present in the EU to claim asylum.
 
I believe there's a EU law stating they need to be physically present in the EU to claim asylum.

There is also an EU law that the first EU country into which they cross, they must seek asylum there. Which nobody is doing.
 
There is also an EU law that the first EU country into which they cross, they must seek asylum there. Which nobody is doing.

I saw some quotes from refugees that they tried that, but were denied on the spot. Or they were put into camps behind barbed wire.
 
I don't know where you read that but those are miniscule outliers. Virtually every other interview has said that "we don't want to stay in Greece/Hungary/Croatia/Bulgaria/Slovenia, we want to go to Germany!!"
 
Many don't want to stay because of the inhumane way they were treated. Most of these countries rejected the refugee quotas proposed by the EU, so they weren't going to end up staying long in any case. The Hungarian PM made some heinous comments about them as well.
 
I think some of the countries have behaved poorly but MOST of these people had no intention of ever staying there anyway. It has been patently clear from the beginning they wanted to go to Germany, and possibly Sweden. The countries which have openly said no to quotas are Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland, of those, Hungary is the only country that the people found themselves in. So far Croatia has had well over 20,000 people cross the border and 2 claimed asylum despite the local government accepting the quota (first 1600, then 3500) imposed on them. What is wrong with Slovenia? Austria has seen relatively few claims as well.
 
I think a good read on the theories underlying the different attitudes toward refugees (and also migrants) is this essay by Alexander Betts, director of the Refugee Studies Centre and Professor of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies at the University of Oxford:
The Normative Terrain of the Global Refugee Regime - Ethics & International Affairs : Ethics & International Affairs

As I stated at the beginning of this essay, the refugee regime is at a crossroads. Created in the aftermath of the Second World War, the regime was a product of its time. Since then, international society has evolved. The distribution of power in the international system has changed, as has the nature of displacement. As asylum and immigration have become more politicized, so too has the protection space available to refugees diminished.
[...]
Old assumptions no longer apply. Refugees are not an inevitable cost on host states; they can also be a socioeconomic benefit. States are no longer the only protection actors; markets also matter for the outcomes for refugees.
[...]
To renegotiate it today would be almost politically impossible; indeed, it would likely result in a worse agreement than was arrived at in 1951.
 
I saw a post and video on Facebook today on the riots occurring in Europe.

I have not seen anything on this in the mainstream U.S. media.

I did a Google search and got a lot of hits.
 
This may not have involved Syrian refugees, but could easily start a backlash:

COLOGNE, Germany (AP) - More women came forward Wednesday alleging they were sexually assaulted and robbed during New Year's Eve celebrations in the German city of Cologne, as police faced mounting criticism for their handling of the incident.
At least 106 criminal complaints have been filed since last week, Cologne police spokesman Christoph Gilles said. The figure has increased from 90 since Tuesday.
"At least three quarters have a sexual component. In two cases we are investigating crimes that amount to rape," Gilles told The Associated Press.
About 1,000 men described by police as being of "Arab or North African origin" gathered around Cologne's main station, next to the city's famous cathedral, on the night from Thursday to Friday. Smaller groups then surrounded individual women, harassed them and stole their belongings.
Police initially failed to mention the assaults in report the following morning, describing the festivities as "largely peaceful."
Details of the attacks only emerged over the weekend and calls have grown for a comprehensive review of police actions on the night, after some witnesses claimed that officers didn't stop the attackers.
Gilles said police were well prepared on the night, but "surprised" by the scale and aggression of the attacks.
Mayor Henriette Reker said she expected police to analyze what went wrong and "draw consequences from that."
She didn't elaborate on what that would entail. Police chief Wolfgang Albers has shrugged off questions about his own future, saying that he will stay in his post, though he acknowledged that the initial failure to mention the assaults was a mistake.
Ralf Jaeger, North Rhine-Westphalia state's interior minister, said he expected a detailed report from Cologne police this week on who knew what when.
"The Cologne police force must clear up meticulously what happened where and when, what police could know and evaluate when and where, and what measures have to be taken."
Gilles, the police spokesman, said the city has 10 officers working on the attacks and four men have been detained.
Among the angles police are investigating is whether there are any links to similar crimes committed over the past two years in the nearby city of Duesseldorf, where men have groped women to distract them before stealing their belongings. The two cities are 40 kilometers (25 miles) apart.
Markus Niesczeri, a spokesman for Duesseldorf police, said that since the start of 2014, officers there have identified more than 2,000 suspects of North African origin in connection with organized thefts, though he didn't say how many. He declined to say whether there have been any arrests in those cases.
"At the moment we can't make a serious connection because we don't have the perpetrators from New Year's Eve," Gilles said. "It's not excluded that there are overlaps, but that's still the subject of investigation."
Police are encouraging more women to come forward.
"Most of the victims were from outside Cologne who filed criminal complaints in their home towns or with federal police," Gilles said, adding that they included women of all ages and nationalities.
In addition to widespread shock over the scale and nature of the attacks, the incident has also fueled public debate about Germany's ability to integrate large numbers of migrants.
Germany registered nearly 1.1 million people as asylum seekers last year, according to Interior Ministry figures released Wednesday, and some politicians who have called for limits on migration have seized on the incident in Cologne to bolster their position.
Germany's top security official stressed that those involved must be punished regardless of where they come from. Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere said that "you cannot draw a general suspicion against refugees from the indications that they were perhaps people who looked North African."
He added that "a bit of patience is necessary to clear up as completely as possible the structure of the perpetrators and the organizational structures there might have been," including whether there was any link to similar, smaller-scale incidents on New Year's Eve in Hamburg.
De Maiziere noted that, under German law, criminal behavior has a direct effect on a person's asylum proceedings if he or she is sentenced to at least three years in prison. He said that "we will have to talk about whether that needs to be changed."
In any case, "anyone who commits serious crimes, whatever status he is in, must reckon with being deported from Germany," de Maiziere said.
Antonia Rabente, a 26-year-old student in Cologne, said the mood in the city was divided.
"On the one hand there's a feeling that what happened is wrong and many people concerned about this. But where people are split is in how to respond," she said. "I think it's important to keep the focus on the women who were affected. They need to be the focus of attention now and not misused for attacks on the right to asylum."
About 100 people protested Wednesday against a far-right rally near the train station that numbered less than 10 people.
Watching from nearby, Gudrun Sauer, a retired civil servant, said she was disappointed by the events and called for a change in the law to allow foreigners found guilty of serious crimes to be deported regardless of whether they face possible persecution in their home country.
But she disagreed with those who blamed the latest wave of refugees for the assaults.
"The people who come here and went through such hardship, they're hoping for a better future here," said Sauer. "I don't think they'd risk doing something like that. You shouldn't throw everything in one pot."
Cologne's mayor, meanwhile, was mocked on social media for saying, when asked Tuesday about what women can do to protect themselves better: "There is always the possibility of keeping a certain distance, more than an arm's length" from strangers.
Some of those who criticized her felt that Reker was blaming women for the attacks and lambasted the idea that women could have simply protected themselves by keeping men at arm's length.
Reker said Wednesday that she regretted any misunderstanding, but had merely been pointing to existing prevention and counseling programs in response to a journalist's question.
"The priority is for concrete security to be provided on our streets and squares," she said in a statement.

The fact this involved hundreds of men and seems coordinated throughout the country sounds terrifying to me, especially as a woman.

And I don't even want to know what's going through the mind of that Cologne mayor ?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
This may not have involved Syrian refugees, but could easily start a backlash:



The fact this involved hundreds of men and seems coordinated throughout the country sounds terrifying to me, especially as a woman.

And I don't even want to know what's going through the mind of that Cologne mayor ?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

That mayor is nucking futs. Could be a tipping point for the German public.
 
This may not have involved Syrian refugees, but could easily start a backlash:



The fact this involved hundreds of men and seems coordinated throughout the country sounds terrifying to me, especially as a woman.

And I don't even want to know what's going through the mind of that Cologne mayor ?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference


That's atrocious and sickening. Few things infuriate me as much as rape. Can't imagine the horror of that happening. I hope these bastards are brought to justice.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
This may not have involved Syrian refugees, but could easily start a backlash:



The fact this involved hundreds of men and seems coordinated throughout the country sounds terrifying to me, especially as a woman.

And I don't even want to know what's going through the mind of that Cologne mayor ?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

Although there have been reports of smaller scale incidents in Stuttgart and Hamburg, there's no evidence of these being coordinated and neither is there evidence they were committed by refugees. By saying the perpetrators 'looked Arab or North African' doesn't mean they were refugees, many German citizens are North African/Arab. It's a scheme that's been used for a while, gangs of petty thieves approach women and verbally harass them to divert their attention and steal small belongings such as phones, wallets etc. It has to be rightfully treated as a crime, however it can't be used as a tool to debate cultural attitudes towards women as some have been doing. Such a shame.
 
Although there have been reports of smaller scale incidents in Stuttgart and Hamburg, there's no evidence of these being coordinated and neither is there evidence they were committed by refugees. By saying the perpetrators 'looked Arab or North African' doesn't mean they were refugees, many German citizens are North African/Arab. It's a scheme that's been used for a while, gangs of petty thieves approach women and verbally harass them to divert their attention and steal small belongings such as phones, wallets etc. It has to be rightfully treated as a crime, however it can't be used as a tool to debate cultural attitudes towards women as some have been doing. Such a shame.

Except that stolen cellphones have been traced to a refugee camp near Cologne.. That was reported in the paper today. And others were indicated by fellow refugees. There were two moroccan men arrested as well that carried an IS flag and had notes in both Arabic and German about big boobies, I want to have sex with you and how to say a death threat...
 
Upwards of 800,000 migrants in one year to Germany. Most from world hotspots. What could possibly go wrong?
 
Yes, what could possibly go wrong? Apparently, that it brings out our arrogance and cultural chauvinism. Every third woman in the EU experienced sexual harrassment/violence at least once in her life? Who cares, now we have the Muslims to worry about. Statistically, refugees/immigrants are as criminal (no less, but also no more) as the local population? Sure, but if they do it it's much worse. We are allowed to be criminal, they are culturally predisposed to do so. Europeans, Americans etc. going to Thailand to have sex with whomever they please? But our culture respects women (unless they speak up, or demand equal pay. No sorry, two thirds is all you get).

I have not seen a single report mentioning an alleged IS flag. On the other hand, every idiot can get the template and print all kinds of IS material. They have a damn good marketing strategy. Getting wasted doesn't speak for the best of IS mentality though. Nor doesn't stealing and harrassing women. May wanna reread the Quran.

It's not entirely clear how the phones ended up with the refugees. Does it mean they didn't steal them? No, see above. What I also wouldn't rule out: Both Assad as well as ISIS are not too pleased about refugees coming to Europe to take shelter and being welcomed by the local populace. Since the beginning of the uprising in 2011 Syrian intelligence has been going after members of the opposition in Europe. And they certainly rather have those who seek refuge being treated like shit than feeling to comfortable about having made it out of Syria. ISIS, on the other hand, is quite pissed whenever the infidels of the West are good to Muslims. It just doesn't fit with the narrative that they build upon, that the Sunnis of the world, the only true believers in monotheism, are the oppressed ones who have to stand up against each and everyone else.

The note that was found indeed contained such phrases, the alleged death threat however was a botched translation of an Arabic phrase which means something like "I'll give it to you real good."

Of this group of somewhere between 400 and 1000 persons, an undisclosed number of men of mixed background have, for the purpose of stealing, due to drunkenness or simply because they are assholes, harrassed women. Many other men of an equally diverse background have actively shielded persons, predominantly women who seemed vulnerable, as there was a lot of pushing and shoving going on in this mass of people.

So what can we take from here? Some men are assholes. Deflection is still a pretty good tactic to steal from people. Our societal reflexes are as archaic as how we perceice "their" culture. An honest discussion about attitudes towards women? No, we know enough about this ArabNorthAfrica and those people (all Muslims, of course). We don't need to discuss Gamer Gate, Trump, sexual violence in the industrialised world, remarks on social media or in the comments section of news when a woman dares say something... We now have refugees and who better to blame for everything wrong than those who cannot defend themselves? Nevermind the facts. We don't blame individuals for their crimes, we lump them all together. All crimes committed by foreigners can now be attributed to refugees.

If a number of refugees were actively involved in the crimes: Congratulations, you are an idiot. Not only does it mean that your chances of residence or asylum status have just gone out the window, you also did all other refugees and foreigners a great disservice.

Last year more than one refugee shelter a day was burnt down. On January 3 or 4 a person fired seven bullets at a refugee shelter, lightly injuring one person. Around the same time a family of refugees was attacked. The elderly father, who needed a rollator to walk, was beaten up. Yesterday another refugee was admitted to hospital with severe injuries. And those are just a few cases.

Women who speak out in favour of refugees or immigrants in general not seldom get reactions such as "I hope they rape you" and the like, death threats are a daily occurrence, yesterday there was a bomb threat against the offices of the central council of Muslims, last fall I had to leave my work due to a bomb threat and so on.

No doubt, the position of women in most Arabic societies is far from ideal, often grim. The Arab Spring did not bring about as much change for women as was hoped for. But it doesn't take away from the fact, our Western reaction to these realities is informed by a lot of prejudice, ignorance and a general sense of superiority, which allows us to judge the crime by one from a culture different to ours as far worse than the same kind of crime by one who shares the same heritage.

It's a shame these crimes happened, and it's equally a shame that a large number of people who any other day harrass, threaten or assault women have now discovered their feminist side. Not because they woke up to the reality that many women live in, but because it was done by people who they didn't like even before.

To end on a positive note: I still see and experience more people supporting others who come here for help than those raging against them.
 
Reactionary right wingers and their cultural supremacy idiocy aside, I think it was a terrible idea of Merkel to basically invite a million people over with NO plan on how to get there and seemingly little plan of what to do with them once they are there. It's unbelievably irresponsible, it strained the resources of poor transit nations and brought up old fights (specifically in the Balkans). Furthermore, the screening was poor to non-existent all at the expense of the neediest refugees who had neither the wherewithal nor the funds to traipse around Europe like many young male migrants. The proper screening and transports should have been based in the many refugee camps in Lebanon, Jordan, Syria to ensure that triage is followed. If you truly care about refugees, that should have been advocated and also an orderly pattern of bringing them out west such that each of them is able to receive the attention and resources to integrate and thrive. It isn't as if this isn't being done by other nations - Germany screwed the pooch on this one and no, you don't need to be a skinhead to realize how problematic their approach has been.
 
No doubt, the position of women in most Arabic societies is far from ideal, often grim.

Actually it is almost universally APPALLING. We (the west) have completely failed women in these nations, because we'd rather get cheap oil. It is shocking what goes on in the 21st century. As a woman, I'm ashamed.
 
What is wrong with Slovenia?


Please do not assume the response of the country represents the feelings of all its people. Many in Slovenia disagree with the fence and the refusal of the refugees.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
Reactionary right wingers and their cultural supremacy idiocy aside, I think it was a terrible idea of Merkel to basically invite a million people over with NO plan on how to get there and seemingly little plan of what to do with them once they are there. It's unbelievably irresponsible, it strained the resources of poor transit nations and brought up old fights (specifically in the Balkans). Furthermore, the screening was poor to non-existent all at the expense of the neediest refugees who had neither the wherewithal nor the funds to traipse around Europe like many young male migrants. The proper screening and transports should have been based in the many refugee camps in Lebanon, Jordan, Syria to ensure that triage is followed. If you truly care about refugees, that should have been advocated and also an orderly pattern of bringing them out west such that each of them is able to receive the attention and resources to integrate and thrive. It isn't as if this isn't being done by other nations - Germany screwed the pooch on this one and no, you don't need to be a skinhead to realize how problematic their approach has been.

I’ve never been one to support Merkel, and never jumped the bandwagon as I didn’t see a general shift in policies, neither in Germany nor in the EU, towards refugees.
A directive at the Federal Office for Refugees and Migrants stated that persons from Syria be exempt from the provisions under the Dublin Agreements (the one bringing Greece, Italy and other states down to its knees) and their cases don’t need to be evaluated on an individual basis for the time being. Some guy in the social media department thought “Oh cool!” and tweeted away. This of course was greeted quite positively. Maybe the calculation, if there was any, was that other countries might follow suit.
Sweden said everyone who makes it there would be granted asylum and a residence permit in 2012. It was easy for them to state, as it’s significantly more difficult to get there than to central Europe. So when Germany did something similar (it’s not the same, Germany never promised they would be able to stay any longer than necessary), the result was quite different.
What has been hardly reported and for some reason the connection wasn’t made, was that at the same time when Merkel said “Welcome!” she also sent word to Italy and Hungary to enforce border controls as strictly as Schengen allows.
These contradictory steps aided a situation which of course became very chaotic quickly.
For the most part, the processing of refugees in Germany went rather well. Getting to Germany: not so well. But that also has a lot to do with general attitudes towards refugees in many Eastern European states, not least the Orbàn government in Hungary.
The place in Germany which soon made international headlines, the LaGeSo, is right outside my office window. The reasons are multitude and didn’t start in summer 2015, but have been building over many years (one of our projects for migrants almost went bankrupt because the LaGeSo needed well over a year to process invoices. You can imagine the backlog, and adding to that more people coming each day than could possibly processed). Since December or January people were forced to wait outside because too many came each day. The organisation was terrible and the departments greatly understaffed. Up until summer, nothing whatsoever was done, and then suddenly everyone reacted totally surprised. It’s a long story…
The Dublin system, under which asylum seekers had to stay in the first EU country of entry until their claims were processed, was doomed to fail. The situation was unacceptable for years, and last year became the breaking point.
If you look at the conditions under which refugees and other migrants had to live in these two countries, and the outrageous amounts of human rights abuses, you won’t be surprised that they all attempted to get to Germany once they learnt that they won’t be sent back. Many of our patients (I’m working at a treatment center for survivors of torture) who came through Greece and Italy reported beatings, sexual harassment, threats to their physical well-being, threats to their children’s or spouse’s physical well-being, children and spouses being forced to watch as they were beaten up and so on. Already five or six years ago several European courts ruled that persons must not be deported back to Italy or Greece for these reasons.

The situation along the way to Germany has not improved, quite the opposite. I kinda laughed when Denmark announced it would take away all valuables of refugees reaching the country, thinking what valuables (stealing money from the poor and beaten, that is so in the Christian spirit). The little that didn’t go towards paying smugglers or was successfully hidden was often taken away by corrupt police forces along the way. The reports by refugees are so numerous it’s mind-numbing. Basically, you will not reach central Europe without having been detained and forced to surrender your money at least once.
Fortress Europe, as many call it, has been erected over the past two decades. Not a single European country ever really had an interest in a fair asylum system. We made our (business) deals with Assad and all the other thugs in the world, and they were meant to keep refugees/migrants away from us. Take Libya for example: Once Gaddafi was halfway rehabilitated, oil came to Europe again and incentives were negotiated to keep Africans away from Europe. Once he was ousted, EU delegations were quick to make sure the interim government would not change this policy. Since the 1990s and the Balkan wars policy in Europe has always been about how to reduce the number of persons getting here, not how to organise for an effective asylum system. At the same time as England agreed to join the forces against the Taliban in Afghanistan, they greatly restricted access to asylum in the UK. “We are invading your country, so stay the fuck there.”
Over the past five years, there has also been no attempt whatsoever to effectively help with the refugees from Syria. Germany first allowed 5000, in the end 20,000 persons from refugee camps in Lebanon to be moved to Germany. The regulations and screening procedures were a bureaucratic monster, straining the resources of UNHCR which was to select the lucky ones. With the neighbouring countries of Syria hosting well over two Million refugees even then, 20,000 was an absurdly low number. Yet, it was ten times more than the next most generous country.
The next best thing would be to give all the support needed to help the refugees in Turkey, Northern Iraq, Lebanon and Jordan. Given, Turkey is a special case, but the other three countries provide full access to all UN bodies, and are straining. Promises were made, but the funding gap consistently remains around 50%.
The response by the European States at large has never been a genuine concern for the people affected by the escalating violence in Syria. This hasn’t changed. Now there’s a grossly disproportionate concern for ISIS, while the true slaughtering can go on unabated, producing even more refugees.
 
Actually it is almost universally APPALLING. We (the west) have completely failed women in these nations, because we'd rather get cheap oil. It is shocking what goes on in the 21st century. As a woman, I'm ashamed.

No denying it, but isn't it also interesting how we are immediately focussed on that? That was the point people haven't got tired to make in the aftermath of Köln, that of course there is all reason to have a debate on the situation for women in the Arab society. It's a huge topic in Egypt, where many women say in resignation that the Arab Spring didn't exactly pay off for the country, but especially it didn't pay off for women. This would be a topic for another thread, and we are also looking at more than a dozen countries, with varying degrees of discrimination, violence and also politico-religious structures.

The criticism is to how the role of women in these societies has all of a sudden become cause for concern. As a lot of commentators pointed out, what happened on New Year's Eve is no different than what happens at any day during carnival, which starts next month, or during Oktoberfest, but that has never caused the whole country to discuss the evil Judeo-Christian misogynist man, and it certainly has not resulted in a single vigilante group to roam the streets and attack any man who happened to be out past 8pm.
 
No denying it, but isn't it also interesting how we are immediately focussed on that?

...

The criticism is to how the role of women in these societies has all of a sudden become cause for concern.

See I don't see this at all. Now you live in Germany and therefore are much more familiar with general European news, commentators and attitudes and have a totally different perspective. In North America, the women of the Arab world are like the forgotten minority. Every once in a while you get some outrage about a woman being stoned, or not being permitted to drive, but ultimately there has been no organized, concerted effort to care or do anything about it. The US government is in bed with the Saudi royal family, a relationship so ingrained that for the duration of the Iran nuclear deal negotiations every second (Republican) commentator on CNN and similar channels was despairing over how much this is upsetting the Saudis. Hello, who cares? The Saudis are the most brutal, awful, entitled dictatorship around, a major funding nation of terrorism, one of the main antagonists of Israel (and yet nobody wants to talk about it), but heaven forbid anyone calls for real change there.

The Arab nations, when it comes to women's rights, are living in the stone age, maybe even worse than that. And this is a good place where you can actually separate Islam from culture to a degree, because there are other Islamic majority countries where the situation is not as bad although if we are being honest, the rights of women in Muslim majorities are extremely poor, it is just a question of degree. But that's a debate for another day.
 
See I don't see this at all. Now you live in Germany and therefore are much more familiar with general European news, commentators and attitudes and have a totally different perspective. In North America, the women of the Arab world are like the forgotten minority. Every once in a while you get some outrage about a woman being stoned, or not being permitted to drive, but ultimately there has been no organized, concerted effort to care or do anything about it. The US government is in bed with the Saudi royal family, a relationship so ingrained that for the duration of the Iran nuclear deal negotiations every second (Republican) commentator on CNN and similar channels was despairing over how much this is upsetting the Saudis. Hello, who cares? The Saudis are the most brutal, awful, entitled dictatorship around, a major funding nation of terrorism, one of the main antagonists of Israel (and yet nobody wants to talk about it), but heaven forbid anyone calls for real change there.

The Arab nations, when it comes to women's rights, are living in the stone age, maybe even worse than that. And this is a good place where you can actually separate Islam from culture to a degree, because there are other Islamic majority countries where the situation is not as bad although if we are being honest, the rights of women in Muslim majorities are extremely poor, it is just a question of degree. But that's a debate for another day.

If you look at the current British government I think their entire policies in regards to Saudi Arabia even exceed that of the US. The US sees it as a trade relationship and enjoys having their bases their, for the rest they treat Saudi Arabia with astonishing indifference.
Cameron's government, on the other hand, is actively brushing over Saudi's awful human rights record or the very fact that the state-endorsed Wahhabi teaching of Islam, with state-funded Islamic schools crowding out local Islamic schools around in the Middle East, Asia, Africa and the Balkans being prime recruiters of Islamic fundamentalists, has been key in bringing Saudi Arabia into the human rights council of the UN, and just yesterday released yet another report that bends over backwards to ignore the various human rights violations in the country.

I think the only country that has done anything significant and admirable in terms of defending human rights has been Sweden, which didn't step back when their criticism of the flogging of Raif Badawi actually hurt their trade and diplomatic relations.

But yes, it's another topic altogether. In regards to the incidences that happened in Cologne, my point were the following:

1. The crimes committed were used as a vehicle to turn the public's view from favour to anger, fear and hostility towards non-Western immigrants in general, and refugees in particular. A broad generalisation of North African/Middle Eastern/Muslim was used to perpetuate stereotypes about a "culture" that was to explain why these people just have it in their DNA to commit sexualized crimes. No one knew who these attackers were exactly, their background, how long they have been here, the reasons they came here, the social circles they moved in, the circumstances they lived in before they came here or anything else. This was especially exemplified in an immediate blaming of these crimes on the refugees, most of whom stemming from Syria. Racial stereotypes of "them Muslim savages who only know how to mistreat women come here and endanger our women" were exploited to create an atmosphere of hatred and deep distrust. No one cared to look up what happens to a man who attacks, gropes or sexually insults a woman in this entire region. Instead, the attacks on Tahrir Square or in Syria were brought up as a case in point, as if revolutions and state-organised mass attacks are somehow the norm in Egypt and Syria.
2. The people who most vocally called for action against these "Muslim North African Arab Middle Easterners" (by that, everyone with a different skin colour is automatically rendered Muslim and a risk to "our" women), were the same people that say to any woman who dares speak her mind, "Shut up; slut; bitch; you deserve to be raped" etc. Trump and his followers got up in arms about the issue, of all people. UKIP, Britain First, the German NPD and AFD, Front National, Wilders and the entire rest of the otherwise misogynist, racist garbage suddenly showed concern for the safety of women.
3. To reiterate, every third woman in the EU reported to have been a victim of sexual harassment or sexual crimes in a recent study. And no, these women did not overwhelmingly report recently arrived war refugees or Arabs from undisclosed heritage to be the attackers, they were family members, husbands or other fellow white Europeans in the majority of reported cases. Or just think of the woman who walked the streets of New York filming the men whistling, staring and making sexual gestures or comments at her in broad daylight. She wore a perfectly normal top and shorts, but was told if she hadn't dressed as sexually inappropriate, none of that would've happened, and she just got what she asked for (which in turn means, we don't want women to wear burqas, because that's what evil, misogynist Muslims do, but if a woman shows skin she is being told to be "sexifying" herself for men and she should cover up). Point being: We have a lot of catching up to do when it comes to gender-based crimes, yet we can perfectly brush over our own shortcomings because we can point fingers at the whole of North Africa and the Middle East.
4. Saudi Arabia is not the same as the rest of the Middle East or North Africa. There's great diversity. There are great differences in the situations of women in society. The role of women in the various Arab cultures is extremely complex, multi-faceted and multi-dimensional. That's not to say that women in these countries in general do not have it harder than the average European or North American woman. Severe crimes against women there are at a greater rate, indeed. Laws often discriminate against women. But after Cologne there were no calls to for promoting change in these societies. Instead, the calls for closing our borders even tighter, to cap the number of asylum seekers, and to expel all these criminals from our sacred countries became greater.
Do you see a general shift in our attitude towards these countries, that we know so little about? Except for the fact that women’s rights there must be deplorable, and that all men are just violent, macho sexual gropers who now come here and take the innocence away from our princesses? Because this has been exactly the kind of response by the far-right, who discovered women’s rights for themselves when it could be used against foreigners.
I’m working in Kurdistan and Iraq, one of our topics are women’s rights, fighting FGM, sexualised violence, forced marriage, self-immolation etc. We are working with an organisation in Afghanistan that works in the field of women’s rights. We are working with terre des femmes. The center for torture victims Berlin has an entire project for refugee women who are provided safe housing to protect them from their violent family members and husbands. None has gained any extra attention. No one approaches these initiatives and asks “How can we contribute towards changing attitudes in these countries?”
Last year, 1005 attacks on refugee shelters were recorded by the police in Germany. About 90 already this month. Just this week a hand grenade was thrown at a shelter. Only because it malfunctioned nothing more happened. The leader of the AFD has now stated that police should shoot refugees trying to cross the border into Germany, saying that was within the limits of the law (she may be forgiven, having been born in Dresden she probably confused GDR border laws with the existing laws of the Federal Republic). Her party colleague, at the question whether that should mean that if a mother and child were to try and get into the country, the police should kill the mother answered with a simple “Yes.” This same woman, by the way, granddaughter of Hitler’s finance minister and ultra-conservative Catholic in her policies wants women back in the kitchen, not to be seen or heard in public (why doesn’t she start with herself?) and homosexuality outlawed. But I’m digressing.
This is not a debate on what is the right way to respond to the current refugee situation, the Syrian war, ISIS in Iraq, a vicious dictatorship in Eritrea, a looming genocide in South Sudan and Burundi or a civil war in the Central African Republic. It’s saying, we are Europe and all to ourselves. Have they considered reforming global trade policies? Have they bothered to take into account Europe’s colonial past and post-colonial policies and trade? “We” (as in, the industrialised nations) are not responsible for all that is wrong in the rest of the world. There is agency on these countries. But on the other hand, we cannot absolve ourselves from having any and all responsibility for these very conditions. And a resulting responsibility to provide for the people who are suffering under these conditions, that exceeds a little bit of feel-good charity.
 
Back
Top Bottom