Ongoing Mass Shootings Thread pt 2 - Page 5 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 06-22-2016, 11:17 PM   #61
War Child
 
Caleb8844's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 615
Local Time: 11:55 PM
The ACLU is now joining the ranks of those urging a "No" vote on this terror watch list bill.

They must not have heard their "We Shall Overcome" rendition.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________

__________________
Caleb8844 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 01:49 AM   #62
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: nyc
Posts: 51,730
Local Time: 12:55 AM
Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right
__________________

__________________
Headache in a Suitcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 02:00 AM   #63
ONE
love, blood, life
 
digitize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 13,753
Local Time: 11:55 PM
Serious question from someone who has no love for guns or the Second Amendment: would the sort of "common sense"-style reforms that the Democrats have been proposing actually reduce the sort of mass murders that have inspired said reform ideas? I have some sympathy towards Republican arguments that laws preventing acquisition of firearms by people who fail background checks and/or are on the terrorist watch list won't be helpful when there are shooters who pass background checks and aren't on the terrorist watch list (see: Orlando).

I worry that the only gun law that will stop this sort of mass shooting is one that severely restricts what sorts of firearms are legal at all - e.g. an assault weapons ban. I would have no issue with such a ban, but it's obviously politically impossible right now. I worry that all of what the Democrats are doing adds up to meaningless posturing, even if I'm fundamentally sympathetic to their cause.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________
digitize is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 02:52 AM   #64
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Polish-American Stronghold PA
Posts: 3,460
Local Time: 12:55 AM
Seems like both sides are coming with pre-packaged wishlists in bundled bills. Wish they could pass one common sense paragraph as a show of good faith.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________
Oregoropa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 04:57 AM   #65
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 11,069
Local Time: 01:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitize View Post
Serious question from someone who has no love for guns or the Second Amendment: would the sort of "common sense"-style reforms that the Democrats have been proposing actually reduce the sort of mass murders that have inspired said reform ideas? I have some sympathy towards Republican arguments that laws preventing acquisition of firearms by people who fail background checks and/or are on the terrorist watch list won't be helpful when there are shooters who pass background checks and aren't on the terrorist watch list (see: Orlando).

I worry that the only gun law that will stop this sort of mass shooting is one that severely restricts what sorts of firearms are legal at all - e.g. an assault weapons ban. I would have no issue with such a ban, but it's obviously politically impossible right now. I worry that all of what the Democrats are doing adds up to meaningless posturing, even if I'm fundamentally sympathetic to their cause.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

I think I'm nearly in the same boat as you. Though these measures can't hurt, I sort of can't help but imagine it's not really doing down the right path to answers.
__________________
LuckyNumber7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 08:14 AM   #66
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Popmartijn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 32,373
Local Time: 06:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitize View Post
Serious question from someone who has no love for guns or the Second Amendment: would the sort of "common sense"-style reforms that the Democrats have been proposing actually reduce the sort of mass murders that have inspired said reform ideas? I have some sympathy towards Republican arguments that laws preventing acquisition of firearms by people who fail background checks and/or are on the terrorist watch list won't be helpful when there are shooters who pass background checks and aren't on the terrorist watch list (see: Orlando).
Yes, some mass shootings will still not be prevented. Some might. How many possible deaths saved per year is the tipping point for you to allow a bit more control to happen?

Quote:
I worry that all of what the Democrats are doing adds up to meaningless posturing, even if I'm fundamentally sympathetic to their cause.
Why is that a worry? It is what is happening. There will be no gun control measures passed. So the Republicans can be branded as doing nothing, blocking meaningful government and helping terrorists get guns. And the Republicans will try to brand the Democrats as taking away Second Amendment rights. And so all of this will soon fade away again, until the next mass shooting. And then it'll fade away even further.
__________________
Popmartijn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 12:16 PM   #67
Galeonbroad
 
Galeongirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,606
Local Time: 06:55 AM
lest we forget nothing bad actually happens with these measures passing... there's no people getting killed because they can't get their (semi)automatic gun. So it may not be the perfect solution, but it can't hurt to try.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceRyan View Post
And if U2 EVER did Hawkmoon live....and the version from the Lovetown Tour, my uterus would leave my body and fling itself at Bono - for realz.
Don't worry baby, it's gonna be all right. Uncertainty can be a guiding light...
Galeongirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 02:13 PM   #68
Paper Gods
Forum Administrator
 
KhanadaRhodes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: a vampire in the limousine
Posts: 60,284
Local Time: 11:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galeongirl View Post
lest we forget nothing bad actually happens with these measures passing... there's no people getting killed because they can't get their (semi)automatic gun. So it may not be the perfect solution, but it can't hurt to try.
this is how i feel. i know here in america, my views are more extreme than almost everyone else. but i'm also willing to compromise and simply restrict guns rather than ban them altogether (the latter being what i'd prefer, but again i know that would never happen and most would disagree with me). it's one of the few positions where i cannot understand the other side, at least on some points. for example, the issue of mandatory background checks: really? this is a no-no? republicans are always "well if you've got nothing to hide, what's the problem?" regarding stuff like nsa, police checks, and the like. but a background check on people buying guns is so wrong? yes it won't prevent every shooting, but if it prevents even one, then it would be doing its job.
__________________

"Because a senator - a politician - a person - who can let hang in mid-air the prospect that she might just be sticking around in part, just in case the other guy gets shot - has no business being, and no capacity to be, the President of the United States." -- Keith Olbermann
KhanadaRhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 04:11 PM   #69
Blue Crack Distributor
 
corianderstem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 61,637
Local Time: 09:55 PM
I really wish they weren't hitching their wagons to the "No Fly No Buy" bill. The 'no fly' list is deeply problematic.

But I know there is at least one other bill they're trying to vote on, and I dig that they're trying something resembling anything to force action.

I'm also confused by the Repubs response. Don't want them to get such a show? Why not just do the vote right away? Want a vote? Fine, let's vote. NO. Okay, great. Let's move on.
__________________
corianderstem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 04:25 PM   #70
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Polish-American Stronghold PA
Posts: 3,460
Local Time: 12:55 AM
I think John Lewis (one of the vocal sit-in) members was on the no-Fly list


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________
Oregoropa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 04:28 PM   #71
Blue Crack Distributor
 
corianderstem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 61,637
Local Time: 09:55 PM
That's fucked up.
__________________
corianderstem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 04:29 PM   #72
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,317
Local Time: 09:55 PM
that is a second or even third reason why he should not be permitted to own an assault weapon
__________________
deep is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 05:13 PM   #73
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 38,358
Local Time: 11:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corianderstem View Post
I really wish they weren't hitching their wagons to the "No Fly No Buy" bill. The 'no fly' list is deeply problematic.

But I know there is at least one other bill they're trying to vote on, and I dig that they're trying something resembling anything to force action.

I'm also confused by the Repubs response. Don't want them to get such a show? Why not just do the vote right away? Want a vote? Fine, let's vote. NO. Okay, great. Let's move on.

Yeah, it's baffling. I guess its easier to vacation than vote no

Not that I've actually read either bill, probably pretty much like most of them, but from what most of the media is reporting; the Rep version of the no fly bill seems more reasonable. Maybe just compromise on the time period?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________
BVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 06:31 PM   #74
New Yorker
 
the iron horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: in a glass of CheerWine
Posts: 3,158
Local Time: 12:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregoropa View Post
I think John Lewis (one of the vocal sit-in) members was on the no-Fly list


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

I just heard that mentioned on the news. He has been on the No-Fly
list for five years. He has also been trying to get off of it for fives years. There are problems with the NF list.

Lewis must have just discovered the "gun issue" because a reporter checking his congressional record found nothing about any past concerns.

I'm still waiting to hear discussions and investigations on how the FBI failed in keeping the Orlando murderer on their radar and how that blind spot can be opened.

Russia warned the FBI twice about Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and Tamerlan Tsarnaev
the two Boston terrorists.
__________________
the iron horse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 06:59 PM   #75
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 38,358
Local Time: 11:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the iron horse View Post

Lewis must have just discovered the "gun issue" because a reporter checking his congressional record found nothing about any past concerns.

Was this "journalist" a Breitbart employee? Because he's given a grade of F by the NRA as far back as the late 90s.


As far as the FBI issue, I asked you back a few pages; what would you suggest?

Can you imagine the resources, the hours, and the issues of rights when following someone for months or years and they're not doing anything illegal? And their suspicious activity stops? How do you suggest we the federal government keep tabs on them?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________

__________________
BVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com