No Porn=Cruel And Unusual Punishment?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

MrsSpringsteen

Blue Crack Addict
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
29,276
Location
Edge's beanie closet
LANSING (WWJ) - Michigan Governor Rick Snyder and the state of Michigan are the target of a lawsuit filed by a Macomb County inmate.

Twenty-one-year-old Kyle Richards claims cruel and unusual punishment because the Macomb County Jail does not allow inmates to possess pornographic materials.

In a handwritten lawsuit, Richards claims his civil rights are being violated. He says denying his request for erotic material subjects him to a “poor standard of living” and “sexual and sensory deprivation.”

The Michigan Department of Corrections says that prisons allow some pornographic material, though it’s banned at the jail. The American Civil Liberties Union says prisons have a lot of leeway.

Richards was charged with bank robbery after police followed a trail of snowy footprints and dropped money to his apartment from a bank robbery scene in January in Fraser.

There’s been no comment on the lawsuit from the governor’s office.
 
Well, for a 21 year old male, maybe denial of pron is cruel and unusual punishment!
 
I say, same diff. He'd probably have access to religious materials in prison eventually. Personally I don't have a problem with inmates somehow "earning" religious stuff or even porn I suppose. In jail, not so much.
 
Here's a serious question...

I assume he wants the porn in order to gratify himself......If that's so, why does he need porn? aren't fantasies and imagination enough? This way he can be alone with himself and not have to run the risk of having materials confiscated, etc.
 
Ehm, he's a guy? 21 years old? What guy at that age doesn't rely on porn to get off?
 
if he were asking for religious materials, I am sure he would have many more defenders

Every thread always somehow comes back to religion for you. Anyway..I don't think it's cruel and unusual punishment to be denied religious materials either. That is something that you should be able to practice without materials-just like you don't have to go to church, services, etc to be religious. It's in your heart, in your attitude, in your thinking. But they do have religious services and materials in prisons-just like they have Playboy or whatever porn they have in some of them. Different strokes for different folks, so to speak.

Just like he can use his imagination, etc for his sexual needs. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time without porn.
 
Every thread always somehow comes back to religion for you.

I had my assistant check

sigpic47030_25.gif


he says your statement is not correct.

http://www.u2interference.com/forums/search.php?searchid=1157111
 
"Men's magazines" are a nuisance in custody situations. They can be used as a form of currency, which encourages bartering/trading & that's a security issue. They encourage behavior that is disallowed by the prison system (masturbation, specifically). They can cause fights based on supply & demand (you have a supply & I demand part of it). They just open several Pandora's boxes of problems that prisons don't need & I would assume jails have a similar view on the issue. As for the religious comparison, sure people can fight over religious beliefs, too, but they're less likely to fight over getting a chance to look at each others illustrated Bibles than they are to fight over a peek of some T&A.
 
Back
Top Bottom