Move Over Naomi

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

MrsSpringsteen

Blue Crack Addict
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
29,275
Location
Edge's beanie closet
Naomi Campbell in race row over Cadbury chocolate - Advertising, Media - The Independent

cadburyad_610640t.jpg


Sunday, 29 May 2011


Cadbury is facing the prospect of a black consumer boycott after it compared Naomi Campbell to a chocolate bar in a new advertising campaign.

The supermodel – hardly known for taking things in her stride – is incensed that Cadbury used her name in the strap line to promote its new chocolate bar called Bliss, accusing the company of racism. The ad says: "Move over Naomi – there is a new diva in town."

Yesterday Campbell revealed she is considering "every option available" after Cadbury, owned by the US giant Kraft, refused to pull the ad campaign, which ran in newspapers last week: "I am shocked. It's upsetting to be described as chocolate, not just for me, but for all black women and black people. I do not find any humour in this. It is insulting and hurtful."

The model's mother, Valerie Morris, backed her daughter, saying: "I'm deeply upset by this racist advert. Do these people think they can insult black people and we just take it? This is the 21st century, not the 1950s. Shame on Cadbury."

Disgust at the ad prompted members of the public to complain to the campaign group Operation Black Vote (OBV), which has called for Cadbury to apologise. OBV's Simon Woolley said that without an apology, the "only recourse black people have is not to buy its chocolate". He has written to the American civil rights activists Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson to ask them to mobilise the country's Afro-American population. "I want them to know what their parent company is doing in Europe. I've asked them to support us."

Mr Woolley said that, for black people, being likened to chocolate was as bad as being called a golliwog. "Racism in the playground starts with black children being called 'chocolate bar'. At best, this is insensitive, and at worst it demonstrates Cadbury's utter disregard for causing offence. Its lack of apology just adds insult to injury. The Eurocentric joke is not funny to black people.

"It's particularly galling because we've just had a week that saw the establishment fall over themselves to be close to the Obamas and yet black people are being derided in such an insulting and negative way," Mr Woolley added.

The black activist Lee Jasper said: "This issue is not just about the insult to Naomi Campbell. It's about how these companies treat black people in general. Part of the problem is that they don't see it as offensive."

The racism row comes just one week after a London School of Economics lecturer, Satoshi Kanazawa, hit the headlines for "research" claiming to show that black women are less attractive than those of other races.

A spokesperson for Cadbury insisted that the campaign was "a light-hearted take on the social pretensions of Cadbury Dairy Milk Bliss". He added later, however, that the campaign was "no longer in circulation... we have no plans to repeat the campaign."

Another incident they had in 2009

Cadbury accused of racial stereotyping in chocolate advert - Advertising, Media - The Independent
 
I hardly have the words to describe how utterly ridiculous this is.

First of all:
1. Why do they think it's Naomi CAMPBELL?.....Maybe it was Naomi
WATTS......why is she jumping to conclusions?

2. Secondly, Cadbury's chocolate is absolutely delicious - so why would she be insulted by being compared to something that tastes good?

3. Naomi Campbell IS a diva.....so the ad isn't saying anything that isn't true (assuming of course it IS Campbell they're referring to), and her reaction just proves it.

4. Would she be less insulted if it were an ad for Dairy Queen using the same slogan? What's the problem with Chocolate?

I just don't understand why she's so sensitive about this. It's a perfectly harmless ad.

Just my opinion.....
 
I hardly have the words to describe how utterly ridiculous this is.

First of all:
1. Why do they think it's Naomi CAMPBELL?.....Maybe it was Naomi
WATTS......why is she jumping to conclusions?

2. Secondly, Cadbury's chocolate is absolutely delicious - so why would she be insulted by being compared to something that tastes good?

3. Naomi Campbell IS a diva.....so the ad isn't saying anything that isn't true (assuming of course it IS Campbell they're referring to), and her reaction just proves it.

4. Would she be less insulted if it were an ad for Dairy Queen using the same slogan? What's the problem with Chocolate?

I just don't understand why she's so sensitive about this. It's a perfectly harmless ad.

Just my opinion.....

Well Naomi Watts isn't a well known diva. And then there's the fact that it's an ad for brown chocolate, so the liklihoold of it being Watts... very slim.

And she's not really being "compared" to, she's being told to move over because she's being replaced.

That being said I think her reaction is slightly overreacting, but I wouldn't say the ad is completely harmless either.
 
i reckon someone should be fired to be honest... terrible slogan! i would go nuts if i were her as well actually... i think she's right on this one...

i'm also still upset that Cadbury's was sold to Kraft :down:
 
Why is there not a comma between 'over' and 'Naomi'? Is the ad instructing me to float over her in some fashion?
 
To me this just seems like the complete opposite of progress. If every ad that mentions a black woman/man is scrutinized to this degree, then racism is always going to be a crippling factor on both sides.

Naomi Campbell IS a diva. I couldn't even figure out what her problem was with the ad until I read the article. I guess I just don't think in the way of "Insult to black people!" every time I see a chocolate bar :shrug:
 
Naomi-Campbell-choc-bunny.jpg



I think she should sue.

If corporations want to use celebrities to market their products they should have the person's consent.
 
If corporations want to use celebrities to market their products they should have the person's consent.

THAT's actually what I assumed she was upset about. The ad is clearly wrong in that regard.
 
If corporations want to use celebrities to market their products they should have the person's consent.

:up:

yep, i cannot believe they didn't run it by her in the first place...
 
she is a brand, and gets paid for commercial endorsements

why pay anyone, just steal Johnny Depp's image for hair products

or give yourself the Edge, (with some in a beanie playing a guitar in the background) to hock Viagra :up:
 
They didn't use her last name or photo, so I don't think they need permission. It's obvious who they're talking about, but I don't think anyone can actually prove it.
I don't find the ad all that racist. It's comparing her bitchy, pampered behaviour to the chocolate bar, not that fact that they're both the same colour. And even if they did, it it really that big of a deal? And who's to say a white devil came up with the ad to begin with? I dunno, seems like a huge overreaction, but I still expect:

apologize1original.jpg
 
Cadbury have been very, very sneaky with this ad and I can understand why Naomi is pissed. Legally, she's going to have a hard time taking action because they didn't mention her last name. But anyone with half a brain will know it's directed at her. As for the race thing - it's relevant. The ad has more impact because of color, and (I'm certain) that's why Cadbury went with it. Let's say Nicole Kidman had a reputation for being a diva, Cadbury would run the same ad but for a white chocolate product. Again, this is impossible to prove legally, but if you have your head screwed on you'll see the connection.
 
Let's say Nicole Kidman had a reputation for being a diva, Cadbury would run the same ad but for a white chocolate product.

And no one would give a shit. Why people shy away from things like this is beyond me. "oh no, they pointed out that chocolate and black people have a similar hue!" Aren't there some sort of white twinkie things called blondies? It's an apt comparison. There is nothing racist about it. It shouldn't be taboo to make mention of a person's colour
 
Maybe it's because I'm a chocolate fiend, but I can't see why being called one of the greatest things ever is a bad thing. :shrug:
 
Mr Woolley said that, for black people, being likened to chocolate was as bad as being called a golliwog. "Racism in the playground starts with black children being called 'chocolate bar'. At best, this is insensitive, and at worst it demonstrates Cadbury's utter disregard for causing offence.

nagin_chocolatecity.jpg


Except when black Democratic politicians do it I suppose.
 
Naomi's response sounds suspiciously like that of. . .a diva.

If she has any issue here, it would be the use of her name. I don't find race to be particularly relevant here.
 
To me this just seems like the complete opposite of progress. If every ad that mentions a black woman/man is scrutinized to this degree, then racism is always going to be a crippling factor on both sides.

Naomi Campbell IS a diva. I couldn't even figure out what her problem was with the ad until I read the article. I guess I just don't think in the way of "Insult to black people!" every time I see a chocolate bar :shrug:

:up:
 
Not racist. Dumb, dumb, dumb slogan though.

But, then again, it gets people talking, and if they've got the money to stave off a lawsuit, then it's pretty intuitive marketing... the gorilla ad was a gigantic success.
 
i think the consent thing is a big thing, if she had endorsed it then that's fine obviously

the copy is still crap though!

also, the light purple background colour is very wrong - it is way way way too close to Milka... i glance at the ad and i think of Milka... spoken like a true chocoholic of course :D
 
that's irrelevant really... point is, she didn't give her consent for her name to be used... :shrug:
 
LOL

all I see is a fun dig at Naomi Campbell, about her being such a diva, and now a 'new one is in town', it never crossed my mind about the colour issue.

do people overreact now because the PC world has us on tenderhooks that the tiniest thing is targeted and no longer free?


naomi campbell has always acted innocent. shes a great model, yes, but has ego. she will be fuming, but Im sure as hell people have been fuming at her, A LOT!
 
Back
Top Bottom