Monsanto? - Page 3 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 06-25-2015, 12:46 PM   #31
The Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 49
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVS View Post
Wideawake, in reading that "article" it's still just innuendo and rumor. And I find this growing idea that U2 has to address every rumor very odd.

I haven't made any judgements regarding Monsanto, I've seen informed articles on both sides(and some very uninformed). I do believe there is some urban legend tied to Monsanto and they probably don't deserve the boogie man status they have.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
Hi, yes, you could be right and I'll try to be open-minded about all this. However, I don't believe Monsanto can be assumed to be squeaky clean, either. Agent orange? Suicide seeds? Again, this is beyond the debate of whether or not GM is safe.

I suggest investigation of Jeffrey Sachs's attitudes to Monsanto as being a reasonable reliably proxy as to Bono's viewpoint. Nothing to do with GM science per se, but about business, economics, markets.

Edit: Reasonably reliable proxy!
__________________

__________________
wideawake2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 12:53 PM   #32
The Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 49
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVS View Post
I find this growing idea that U2 has to address every rumor very odd.
On second thoughts, I would like to add, it depends on the rumour. If it is about whether or not Adam had an affair with Larry's wife, then, no. It is not our business. But Bono talks about development issues at every opportunity. He has strong opinions on these issues. He makes the "business" of Africa our "business". He must have an opinion on Monsanto. Neil Young clearly has expressed his opinion as any self-professed "activist" or "artist with a conscience" perhaps should. Since there is so much opposition to Monsanto (for a variety of reasons), isn't it damaging to Bono's One Campaign etc. to stay silent on this controversy? Unless his viewpoint is controversial... ?
__________________

__________________
wideawake2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 12:58 PM   #33
The Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 49
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galeongirl View Post
I do not need to do research, as I am a scientist in the field of genetically modified vaccines.
Doesn't sound like scientific / academic rigour to me
__________________
wideawake2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 01:26 PM   #34
Galeonbroad
 
Galeongirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,773
Local Time: 07:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wideawake2015 View Post
I REITERATE. My bone of contention with Monsanto primarily has NOTHING to do with the GM issue. Please re-read my comments, and those of at least two other people who commented. The GM debate is not all about the science or about levels of public acceptance of the science – it is also about the economics and the industry.




Ireland has not collapsed? Er, I think you will find that the economy crashed, and it was bailed out, which perhaps creates the illusion that it has not collapsed. But, ask Irish tax payers facing austerity. Would it have been helpful for the country and would it have alleviated some of the problems of austerity if U2 had decided NOT to move some of their business elsewhere and had paid more tax in Ireland instead?



Thank you for the advice and for your educated insights. Pleasant chatting with you. I hope when I get educated my teachers are less patronising since I don't find that very conducive to learning.
That's good then. I was just mentioning that and since you didn't seem to understand my first post I elaborated. While I have no issues with GM, I find several business decisions of Monsanto to be painful the least. But I don't believe the hype that they're completely evil, that has been blown way out of proportions.


And no, Ireland would have not had any difference with U2's tax. The country had a big problem, just like other European countries like Italy or Spain or Greece. Now Greece has collapsed. Ireland is on the way back up. U2's taxes would've been such an insignificant amount on the huge debt they had, it would not have made a difference. At all.

ANd for the patronising, isn't it ironic? Since this is exactly the wording you used in your first post.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceRyan View Post
And if U2 EVER did Hawkmoon live....and the version from the Lovetown Tour, my uterus would leave my body and fling itself at Bono - for realz.
Don't worry baby, it's gonna be all right. Uncertainty can be a guiding light...
Galeongirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 01:28 PM   #35
Galeonbroad
 
Galeongirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,773
Local Time: 07:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wideawake2015 View Post
Doesn't sound like scientific / academic rigour to me
That's because I have just finished this part of research. I can link you when the paper gets accepted for publishing. But even scientists have jobs where they are supposed to do a research in a limited amount of time. So you do the research, then move on to the next. Has nothing to do with scientific rigour, has to do with getting bread on the table.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceRyan View Post
And if U2 EVER did Hawkmoon live....and the version from the Lovetown Tour, my uterus would leave my body and fling itself at Bono - for realz.
Don't worry baby, it's gonna be all right. Uncertainty can be a guiding light...
Galeongirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 01:42 PM   #36
The Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 49
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galeongirl View Post
That's good then. I was just mentioning that and since you didn't seem to understand my first post I elaborated. While I have no issues with GM, I find several business decisions of Monsanto to be painful the least. But I don't believe the hype that they're completely evil, that has been blown way out of proportions.
Thanks for clarification. I did understand your first comments, but they were not addressing my concerns, and you seemed to make an assumption about my concerns. However, that is understandable since I'm sure you receive a lot of flak for your research and that 99.999% of criticisms are about the safety of GM etc.

I would like to add that you only have to watch TV commercials in the USA about legal action against drug companies to know that scientific research is always limited. If science were ever 100% certain about everything, then science would be redundant, right? I trust that you know FAR FAR more than me about GM science, I think being sceptical is healthy. I once read an interview with a climate change scientist. The interviewer asked a question that typically pitched scientists against climate change sceptics. The scientist replied something like, "But we scientists are the biggest climate change sceptics and that's what we are so interested in doing research".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Galeongirl View Post
And no, Ireland would have not had any difference with U2's tax. The country had a big problem, just like other European countries like Italy or Spain or Greece. Now Greece has collapsed. Ireland is on the way back up. U2's taxes would've been such an insignificant amount on the huge debt they had, it would not have made a difference. At all.
I beg to differ. If it was worth moving that part of the business in order to pay less tax, then it is money, and worth something to the Irish economy. "Every little helps" as the supermarket commercial used to say! If Ireland is on the way up, then I'm sure tax has something to do with it. At least, that is a key message of austerity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Galeongirl View Post
ANd for the patronising, isn't it ironic? Since this is exactly the wording you used in your first post.
I apologise, because my initial post was perhaps an emotional rant! However, the comments on getting educated were addressed singularly to Bono and not to the contributors of this forum. I simply believe that Bono is not educated on many of the issues he talks about. I really wish he WOULD go and take a degree in international development, but he seems to think he already knows all the issues and has all the answers. But it seems that when Bono is criticised, many U2 fans take it as personal criticism. This is unscientific and illogical. Reminds me more of a cult than a discussion on how best to save the world.
__________________
wideawake2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 01:45 PM   #37
The Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 49
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galeongirl View Post
That's because I have just finished this part of research. I can link you when the paper gets accepted for publishing. But even scientists have jobs where they are supposed to do a research in a limited amount of time. So you do the research, then move on to the next. Has nothing to do with scientific rigour, has to do with getting bread on the table.
Taken out of context, your comment suggested that scientists don't need to do research. But I knew that is not what you meant! I was being pedantic and / or facetious. However, it was intended to be friendly!
__________________
wideawake2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 01:50 PM   #38
The Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 49
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galeongirl View Post
I can link you when the paper gets accepted for publishing..
Thank you. Please do.
__________________
wideawake2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 01:58 PM   #39
The Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 49
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galeongirl View Post
I find several business decisions of Monsanto to be painful the least. But I don't believe the hype that they're completely evil, that has been blown way out of proportions.
I'm very interested to know how you come to this conclusion? How do you make this judgement? How can we measure the degree of being "evil" against the degree to which accusations have been blown out of proportion? According to my limited understanding, there are things called monopolies commissions which keep corporations in the realms of what are deemed acceptable proportions. Why do we have those mechanisms? Does Monsanto not have a monopoly on the US food market? How far does this monopoly reach across the globe? How far would Monsanto like its influence to reach? Has it responded to criticism by implementing better practice, or simply tried to counter criticism in PR campaigns? I think we need to address all these questions before we can judge that criticism is blown out of proportion. Otherwise it comes down to arguments such as "climate change is exaggerated".
__________________
wideawake2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 03:22 PM   #40
Galeonbroad
 
Galeongirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schoo Fishtank
Posts: 70,773
Local Time: 07:57 AM
Because most things I've read against monsanto were not official documents or proper journalism. They were emotional irrational rants from random people on the internet, and everybody seems to copy off each other. That is what I mean with things blowing out of proportion.

I don't know much about Monsanto's business models, so I don't have a big opinion on it. But that does not mean I'll take anything what I hear on the internet about them for truth. I'm sceptical from both sides, but they're not necessarily evil until proven otherwise. I'm neutral until proven otherwise. Perhaps I know less of them because I'm not American, but it's really not much of a big deal in Europe.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceRyan View Post
And if U2 EVER did Hawkmoon live....and the version from the Lovetown Tour, my uterus would leave my body and fling itself at Bono - for realz.
Don't worry baby, it's gonna be all right. Uncertainty can be a guiding light...
Galeongirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 03:36 PM   #41
The Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 49
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galeongirl View Post
Because most things I've read against monsanto were not official documents or proper journalism. They were emotional irrational rants from random people on the internet, and everybody seems to copy off each other. That is what I mean with things blowing out of proportion.

I don't know much about Monsanto's business models, so I don't have a big opinion on it. But that does not mean I'll take anything what I hear on the internet about them for truth. I'm sceptical from both sides, but they're not necessarily evil until proven otherwise. I'm neutral until proven otherwise. Perhaps I know less of them because I'm not American, but it's really not much of a big deal in Europe.
Although some would say there is no smoke without fire, I hear you! There can be propaganda on both sides. It is a shame that there seems to be a lack of serious impartial research. However, as a European myself, I wouldn't get too complacent about whether or not it affects us.
__________________
wideawake2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 04:14 PM   #42
The Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 49
Local Time: 02:57 AM
Ok, so we don't know for sure what Bono really thinks about Monsanto. But what do we know about Monsanto? According to, dare I say it, the Wikipedia page for Monsanto, the company is featured in the following documentaries. I have only seen one of them. It would be interesting to further discuss the credibility of the arguments made in these films:

Bitter Seeds
Genetic Roulette – The Gamble of Our Lives
Food, Inc.
The Corporation
The World According to Monsanto
The Future of Food
Percy Schmeiser – David versus Monsanto

Any opinions on these films?
__________________
wideawake2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 04:24 PM   #43
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 10:57 PM
He's hiding something
I've sent him several tweets and emails and he has not responded.

tapatalk, it works
__________________
deep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 04:57 PM   #44
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Polish-American Stronghold PA
Posts: 4,144
Local Time: 01:57 AM
Monsanto plants a demon seed
__________________
Oregoropa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 07:50 PM   #45
Blue Crack Addict
 
Vlad n U 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 28,014
Local Time: 05:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
how much do you know about John Pilger?
What's your angle with this question?
__________________

__________________
Vlad n U 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com