Men must speak up on abortion debate

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
That's so far off base it's not even funny. You're missing my point. All I'm saying is that to me, the only reason this is a "womens" issue is because it incidentally involves a uterus. To me this is an issue of health and privacy and who gets to decide what decisions someone can make about their own health and why. I'd prefer these decisions be left up to those individuals involved and their doctors. Nothing is cut and dry, or black and white. Abortion is hardly the only life/death issue out there where people have to make a call one way or the other. I know people struggling right this very minute with decisions about whether their child is "living" having every breath supported by machines. Unfortunately ordinary people get thrown into these circumstances every day and I just don't think it's appropriate or fair for anyone to judge or have any say in the decision unless they are part of the family or medical support. If someone is against abortions or a doctor is against performing them, it has always been their right to abstain.
 
i have a problem with viewing abortion as a "convenience" -- no woman makes that decision lightly as if she's ordering a milkshake.

Thank you.

I've been at a center where women go for these things. Let's just say nobody, NOBODY looked even remotely happy to be there.

At least most of the people there had people with them to lean on, though. I saw one girl sitting in a corner all by herself, looking scared out of her mind. I felt horrible for her. I'm sure the people yelling at everyone outside over the fence probably didn't help matters, either.

There are some instances of women being very callous about this decision, I think, yes, but lightheartedly made it is not.

And I don't disagree with Dalton that we should teach more responsibility related to sex and all the things that result from it. Yes. We should. I've always said that if we actually got serious about tackling all the problems that lead to abortion in the first place, you'd see them continue to happen less and less. Just saying, "Let's ban it!" won't solve anything-women will still have them, and all that does is sweep all the surrounding problems under the rug, where they'll continue to fester and make the situations worse than they already are.

Angela
 
Where is it even "convenient" to get an abortion these days, anyway? From all I hear, there are fewer and fewer doctors and/or facilities who do it (I think I read 2,000 in the US? That's pretty scary.).

And thanks to all sorts of fun legislation, there are hoops to jump through. You have to wait. You have to be lectured. You have to run around the block 18 times while balancing a ball on your nose or whatever bullshit thing they're going to come up with next.

There are always the arguments that point to an example of a woman having abortions as birth control. Like Dalton so wonderfully said earlier, they like to fuck and don't want to live with the consequences. God, that makes me so mad.

Are there women out there who have had multiple abortions? Probably. Are there some who might actually be cavalier about it? I'm sure you could find a couple, maybe even one who isn't just "a friend of a friend who's cousin knows this one guy who's girlfriend has had 18 abortions in the last two years."

I'm being flippant in my anger, but if someone has numbers about that kind of thing, please bring them up. I'm of course making an assumption that most women who have abortions are not using them as a form of birth control. Because, you know, it's not like buying a milkshake.

Edit: some info on the number of providers in the US:

http://www.mercurynews.com/science/ci_17483970?nclick_check=1

Almost four decades after Roe vs. Wade legalized abortion, one of the big obstacles is access to a trained doctor. One-quarter of California counties and 87 percent of U.S. counties have no known provider.

...

Now only 2 percent of ob-gyns perform half of all abortions. Many are approaching retirement. Others are weary of stigma, threats and violence. The number of providers has declined by 37 percent since 1982.
 
Thank you.

Also, I'd like to point out that most people on the pro-choice side are NOT "for abortion". That's another gross misconception that I REALLY wish would stop.

Angela

Right. The phrasing implies that all those in favor of choice are also in favor of baby stew. No.
 
I know 3 women who have had abortions (probably more, but 3 that have honestly said so), and at least one of them has had two. All of them chose an abortion because of not wanting a child at the time or not wanting a child with the man who was the father. Their own age was a factor, as was finances. I believe alcohol was involved in at least one of the cases, and a broken condom in another.

I'm glad they were able to make the choice for themselves. That's how I see it. Choosing to terminate a pregnancy is a very difficult choice for a woman to make, but I feel it is the woman's choice because it is their body. Whatever led to the decision is between the woman and whatever value system she chooses to live by.

My job as a guy is to not have sex with someone I wouldn't want to potentially have a child with. That's the reality. I don't have sympathy for guys that get caught off guard by that.

I speak up on a woman's right to choose by donating money and with my votes. I feel the anti-choice movement is yet another way our male-dominated society works to keep women down.

FWIW
 
I know 3 women who have had abortions (probably more, but 3 that have honestly said so), and at least one of them has had two. All of them chose an abortion because of not wanting a child at the time or not wanting a child with the man who was the father. Their own age was a factor, as was finances. I believe alcohol was involved in at least one of the cases, and a broken condom in another.

I'm glad they were able to make the choice for themselves. That's how I see it. Choosing to terminate a pregnancy is a very difficult choice for a woman to make, but I feel it is the woman's choice because it is their body. Whatever led to the decision is between the woman and whatever value system she chooses to live by.

My job as a guy is to not have sex with someone I wouldn't want to potentially have a child with. That's the reality. I don't have sympathy for guys that get caught off guard by that.

I speak up on a woman's right to choose by donating money and with my votes. I feel the anti-choice movement is yet another way our male-dominated society works to keep women down.

FWIW

Excellent post. And I wish more "men" subscribed to your philosophy:

"My job as a guy is to not have sex with someone I wouldn't want to potentially have a child with."
 
out of interest, what about things like the morning-after pill - is this readily available/deemed more acceptable in the US?
 
It is available in some places, and is still a viable option that is recommended, but I also have heard stories of places refusing to sell it because of "moral beliefs" and stuff of that nature-even that option still gets some people bothered here, unfortunately. Which is what I don't understand. People are so hellbent on stopping abortion from happening but have a problem with the methods that can be used to do such a thing. I don't get it.

Also, Mark and Cori, excellent posts :up:.

Angela
 
sort of related, food for thought:



Why Monogamy Matters
By ROSS DOUTHAT

Social conservatives can seem like the perennial pessimists of American politics — more comfortable with resignation than with hope, perpetually touting evidence of family breakdown, social disintegration and civilizational decline.

But even doomsayers get the occasional dose of good news. And so it was last week, when a study from the Centers for Disease Control revealed that American teens and 20-somethings are waiting longer to have sex.

In 2002, the study reported, 22 percent of Americans aged 15 to 24 were still virgins. By 2008, that number was up to 28 percent. Other research suggests that this trend may date back decades, and that young Americans have been growing more sexually conservative since the late 1980s.

Why is this good news? Not, it should be emphasized, because it suggests the dawn of some sort of traditionalist utopia, where the only sex is married sex. No such society has ever existed, or ever could: not in 1950s America (where, as the feminist writer Dana Goldstein noted last week, the vast majority of men and women had sex before they married), and not even in Mormon Utah (where Brigham Young University recently suspended a star basketball player for sleeping with his girlfriend).

But there are different kinds of premarital sex. There’s sex that’s actually pre-marital, in the sense that it involves monogamous couples on a path that might lead to matrimony one day. Then there’s sex that’s casual and promiscuous, or just premature and ill considered.

This distinction is crucial to understanding what’s changed in American life since the sexual revolution. Yes, in 1950 as in 2011, most people didn’t go virgins to their marriage beds. But earlier generations of Americans waited longer to have sex, took fewer sexual partners across their lifetimes, and were more likely to see sleeping together as a way station on the road to wedlock.

And they may have been happier for it. That’s the conclusion suggested by two sociologists, Mark Regnerus and Jeremy Uecker, in their recent book, “Premarital Sex in America.” Their research, which looks at sexual behavior among contemporary young adults, finds a significant correlation between sexual restraint and emotional well-being, between monogamy and happiness — and between promiscuity and depression.

This correlation is much stronger for women than for men. Female emotional well-being seems to be tightly bound to sexual stability — which may help explain why overall female happiness has actually drifted downward since the sexual revolution.

Among the young people Regnerus and Uecker studied, the happiest women were those with a current sexual partner and only one or two partners in their lifetime. Virgins were almost as happy, though not quite, and then a young woman’s likelihood of depression rose steadily as her number of partners climbed and the present stability of her sex life diminished.

When social conservatives talk about restoring the link between sex, monogamy and marriage, they often have these kinds of realities in mind. The point isn’t that we should aspire to some Arcadia of perfect chastity. Rather, it’s that a high sexual ideal can shape how quickly and casually people pair off, even when they aren’t living up to its exacting demands. The ultimate goal is a sexual culture that makes it easier for young people to achieve romantic happiness — by encouraging them to wait a little longer, choose more carefully and judge their sex lives against a strong moral standard.

This is what’s at stake, for instance, in debates over abstinence-based sex education. Successful abstinence-based programs (yes, they do exist) don’t necessarily make their teenage participants more likely to save themselves for marriage. But they make them more likely to save themselves for somebody, which in turn increases the odds that their adult sexual lives will be a source of joy rather than sorrow.

It’s also what’s at stake in the ongoing battle over whether the federal government should be subsidizing Planned Parenthood. Obviously, social conservatives don’t like seeing their tax dollars flow to an organization that performs roughly 300,000 abortions every year. But they also see Planned Parenthood’s larger worldview — in which teen sexual activity is taken for granted, and the most important judgment to be made about a sexual encounter is whether it’s clinically “safe” — as the enemy of the kind of sexual idealism they’re trying to restore.

Liberals argue, not unreasonably, that Planned Parenthood’s approach is tailored to the gritty realities of teenage sexuality. But realism can blur into cynicism, and a jaded attitude can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Social conservatives look at the contemporary sexual landscape and remember that it wasn’t always thus, and they look at current trends and hope that it doesn’t have to be this way forever.

In this sense, despite their instinctive gloominess, they’re actually the optimists in the debate.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/07/opinion/07douthat.html?_r=1&ref=opinion
 
But there are different kinds of premarital sex. There’s sex that’s actually pre-marital, in the sense that it involves monogamous couples on a path that might lead to matrimony one day. Then there’s sex that’s casual and promiscuous, or just premature and ill considered.

That seems awfully simplistic. It's either sex in a relationship headed towards marriage, or it's casual and promiscuous sex?
 
i can't believe that isn't a crime for pharmacies and doctors to not offer something like that just because they don't feel like it.

I fully agree. I don't understand that. Whatever happened to that Hippocratic Oath stuff?

Oh god, don't even get me started on that. raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaage.

Especially given that things such as Viagra are totally acceptable, and covered by many insurance things to boot! Yeah. Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaage, indeed.

As for Irvine's article, I personally have no problem with people waiting if they so choose, be it until they're married, or at least until they're in a stable relationship, to have sex. I would actually be amongst that group myself.

But just as I think people shouldn't feel pressured to have sex because "everyone else is (supposedly) doing it", I also don't think people should be forced to abstain from it out of some sense of "shame" or "immorality" or whatever. I think whatever decision people make, either way, should be related to what they and they alone feel most comfortable doing, and not because of some sort of societal "morality" imposed on everybody as though it were a "one size fits all" sort of situation.

Angela
 
people who marry later in life divorce much, much less.

probably one of the reasons is because they've had sex with other people and know enough to know what works and what doesn't and are able to understand the importance (or unimportance, actually) of sex to a relationship.
 
(or unimportance, actually)
I think it's probably more that people who wait longer to marry simply have more relationship experience than people who marry young, whether those relationships included sex or not. Reality checks like the fact that love won't make someone stable and happy if they're unstable and depressed, that loving each other doesn't guarantee your life goals are or ever will be compatible, that virtually every major personality trait each of you possesses will be positive for the other in some situations but challenging for them in others...a relationship doesn't need to include sex to teach you those things.
 
Last edited:
I say change the laws and round up about 500 men that are known to have had sex with any of the following women that had to have an abortion because the men have abandoned them:
Rape (adult, teenage or female child)
defenceless doped up or drunk date
wives forced to have sex against their will.
men who say "if you really loved me I wouldn't have to wear a condom".
(just a sample of the list that should be included, of course)
Since they want to impose all these penalties on women, then turn around is fair play.
These men coerced women into sex whether they wanted to or not and forced a woman into an abortion.
Start imprisoning or executing men for having sex and causing murder or attempted murder, problem solved.
 
...a relationship doesn't need to include sex to teach you those things.


no, but they usually do, and since sex is usually a feature of a married relationship, it stands to reason that previous sexual experience is as useful as any other to the success of a relationship.
 
I prefer hearing from women on the subject...

Opinion: Defund Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood has been misleading Congress and American taxpayers for many years. I know -- I was part of the deception. For eight years I worked at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Texas, and for two of those years I was the clinic's director.

...Particularly since a man ran this clinic.

Abortion Doctor Kermit Gosnell Charged With 8 Counts of Murder

He "induced labor, forced the live birth of viable babies in the sixth, seventh, eighth month of pregnancy and then killed those babies by cutting into the back of the neck with scissors and severing their spinal cord," District Attorney Seth Williams said.

Gosnell referred to it as "snipping," prosecutors said.

Prosecutors estimated Gosnell ended hundreds of pregnancies by cutting the spinal cords, but they said they couldn't prosecute more cases because he destroyed files.
 
I prefer hearing from women on the subject...



you mean a woman.

one who reports as fact distortions like this:

Deception No. 3: Planned Parenthood's highest priority is women's health and safety. As referenced several times during the congressional debate about whether or not to defund Planned Parenthood, Live Action has documented numerous occasions in which Planned Parenthood staff have shown willingness to aid and abet self-identified sex traffickers and their professed exploitation of underage girls.
 
For every horror story told about Planned Parenthood there's probably at least one story about a woman's life saved-an uninsured and/or poor woman who receives life saving diagnosis and treatment. I'm not saying that justifies the horror story-but who is anyone to decide to deprive those women of such a thing and decide that they might or will die as a result?

So if we save the lives of unborn babies, we think, by defunding Planned Parenthood we can live with the other lives lost? Or do we just pretend? Or are all those women just "part of the deception"?
 
you mean a woman.

Actually, according to the NY Times and the Gallup organization, abortion polling since the mid-1970s finds few remarkable distinctions between men’s and women’s views on the legality of abortion.' It has found that 48 percent of American women consider themselves pro-life, while 45 percent consider themselves pro-choice.

So there are a lot of women out there who are pro-life.

one who reports as fact distortions like this:

I'm pretty sure that the facts of whether the NJ Planned Parenthood employee helped two people purporting to be sex traffickers are not in dispute.

Central Jersey Planned Parenthood fires worker after release of undercover video | NJ.com

These "gotcha" tactics might be decried as "an astoundingly cynical form of political activity," as Planned Parenthood said in a statement, but in an age of such tactics on both sides of any given debate, it may be part of the new activism. (I see your philandering, hypocritical politician and I raise you illegal sex trafficking advice!)
 
So there are a lot of women out there who are pro-life.



here's another woman's opinion:

Ask an Abortion Provider
by Dolores P. on March 3rd, 2011

Hello! I am a person who is training to become an abortion provider. As you can imagine, it is really fucking weird to be one of me, especially lately! I think maybe you have some questions?

1st question: Why?

I can pretty safely assume you have not socially encountered one of us before. No, not because I think you’re not cool enough! Let me explain. I went into healthcare in general because of a bunch of shitty gynecologists growing up who told me, for instance, that “when you” (me) “have sex with so many people” (I, like, halved the real number) “so young” (18) that “none of them care about you” (me). I figured the most direct way to ensure that there wasn’t a total asshole at the bottom of the table was to do it myself.

But why abortion, then? State-of-abortion fact storm forecasted for this paragraph. How many providers do you think there are in this country? Like, total. 30,000? 10,000? Nope, fewer than 2,000. Here’s a quote I read today: “Now only 2 percent of ob-gyns perform half of all abortions. Many are approaching retirement. Others are weary of stigma, threats and violence. The number of providers has declined by 37 percent since 1982.” Fewer providers in practice mean fewer people to train from. And other factors — like how only 12% of ob/gyn residency programs require training in abortion — also contribute to our dwindling numbers. So, this time, it was seeing that the most direct way to ensure that anyone — anyone!! — was at the bottom of the table was to do it myself.

There was also a personal reason. On the way to providing abortions (president!) I became a person who has had one (also a member!). In December 2006, at age 20, some wayward jizz from a guy who was still a virgin put me up the stick. That’s right — CONTACT PREGNANT — the statistic, 1 in 1000? Whatever. Let’s just say I took one for the team. Hearing those sighs of relief, first 999 of you reading this! Everyone else: you are at risk. The whole thing went well with no complications and a lot of support from the people around me. The only hitch in the procedure was when I told the doctor about my long-range dream to become a gynecologist and how I had wanted to volunteer there and now, ha-ha, I was a patient. She listened with all of her heart minus the part that governs word choice and then told me that she was proud of my aspiration. What oh. Aspiration like goal! My goal. Of becoming a provider. Not aspiration like an abortion! An aspiration abortion. The kind I was getting.

I was able to move on quickly. The dude forgave me for my method of breaking it to him, which was asking “So, do you want to see what a positive pregnancy test looks like?” and stuck with me. We got engaged this past November. I finished college, got into a grad program to become a nurse practitioner, and four years to the very day of my own abortion I assisted for the first time on another person’s. I have no regrets, and although I’ll never know what could have been PSYCH I do know what could have been! The dude and I would have broken up and I would have not finished college let alone grad school, and I would have been a fucking disaster of a mother, because even now the best I can promise to a child is to be convincing enough that they can't tell I secretly wish they were an adult instead.

I speak of my abortion as a positive experience, not to secure the “most awesome abortion” prize (hello judges…?) but to save a seat for the possibility that this doesn’t have to be the worst thing that ever happened to you in your whole life. I don’t want it to in any way represent anyone else’s experience or make them feel disavowed of their own. So let me say: this is my personal experience with abortion! It was positive in every respect. It made me want to help other people also have as positive an experience as possible, so I went into the business. If you think that’s a bullshit line, or it makes you uncomfortable to think about abortion as something that could possibly be positive for a person, think of why you're a person who doesn't want someone to do the best that they can under the circumstances they're in.

2nd question: What’s it like?

Abortion training in this country is basically done by “apprenticeship” — if you’re an MD/DO, you’re supposed to learn in residency, but as we saw that doesn’t happen so often, so there are organizations like Medical Students for Choice to connect people to training or fellowships like the Ryan that you can take on in your own time. As a nurse practitioner (or a PA, or a midwife) what we’re allowed to do depends on where and when we’re practicing. We can provide medication abortion (mifepristone and misoprostol) in 15+ states but surgical abortion in far fewer, even though the actual procedure is exactly the same as other ones (like completing a failed miscarriage) that are solidly within our scope of practice almost everywhere. This is basically because the world is a vampire, sent to jail. The actual hands-on training is straightforward, because first-trimester surgical abortion is a very technically simple procedure. Completing 100 to 300 procedures is considered achieving competency, and the reason it takes that many procedures is because complications (like infection) happen so infrequently that it takes that many to see even a single one.

When I started I knew intellectually that half the country wished I hadn’t gone to work that day and a smaller percentage probably wished I hadn’t even woken up, but pro-life was never part of my life until I actually took on the job. The idea of “sin” had eroded out of my parents’ Catholicism so that the only part they passed on was the punishment style (“I want to let you know that if you have sex you can get a yeast infection in your eyes and you would deserve it”). I am lucky to be training in a liberal Northeastern state: the biggest impact of "antis” on my training is that I have to bring my lunch every day because it’s not really a good idea to go outside more than you have to. The protesters only figured out that I was a clinician-in-training and not a nightmarishly fertile young woman by my 3rd or 4th visit, and when they called me “babykiller” I was like “No way, I’m still working on ultrasound technique!” A couple weeks later I finally got my shit together to look directly at them and I saw that they were (a) a scraggly group of five or so and (b) all old white dudes, historically the least likely demographic to spiritually or morally lead me. Relief!

I had spent most of my life thinking that “following politics” was like being the sports fan who makes sure to watch every game her team plays and always wears the jersey on gameday. Yeah, I want us to win too, duh, but you know, does it really matter if I’m sitting there? I’ll check it out if they get to the playoffs or whatever. But now that the news is me I understand the value of a stupid tie with team colors. I saw that South Dakota bill and I cried. I wanted to call up my friends and say, “Hello! So, at least a couple people in South Dakota want to make it so that it kind of wouldn’t be illegal to kill an abortion provider. Like, me, your friend who does abortions. I’m an abortion provider and I’m your friend. So it would become legal for someone to kill me, your abortion-providing friend. So please, please, please help me do something about this.”

Up until recently I’d come out of any closet I found myself in — queer, non-monogamous, I fucking love Tool still, whatever — not that I live to hear the drink-choking sound, but because, to me, coming out was just one of the ways I could pay back the privileges that had been arbitrarily bestowed upon me (educated! white-appearing! “normal!”). My responsibility to normalize as much as I could. But training as an abortion provider is the first thing in my life that I hold back on spilling about. At the core of it, there’s a huge gap between saying “I had one” and saying “I do them.” I don’t want to alienate people. And nothing else I’ve ever done or been has felt like a direct invitation to a motivated someone out there to kill me and get away with it.

3rd question: What about the patients? Like, who are they?

I can confidently say that not a single one of my patients wants to be there. If we somehow removed the emotional content and just looked at everything else, abortion is an experience that is at least a little physically painful, and expensive both financially and in time investment. The process of obtaining one is full of bullshit even under the best of circumstances. Please see hilarious Onion articles “I’m Totally Psyched About this Abortion!” and “New Law Requires Women to Name Baby, Paint Nursery Before Getting Abortion.”

Nobody wants a fucking abortion or at any point in their lives thought, “Oh, who cares, I’ll just take care of it.” Not even the woman on her tenth who said to me when I came in the room, “Hm, I haven’t seen you before! You must be new.” I am going to tell you that having 10 abortions is extremely rare, but I am also going to tell you without even starting another sentence that it doesn’t matter how rare it is because there should be no hierarchy of abortion. On demand, without apology? Great, I’m glad we all agree. It all breaks down to this: no one is immune to mistakes, whether it’s a mistake of their own making or (more likely) an end effect of the system, especially our fucked-up broken medical system I hate representing. (Sorry, system! Had to say it.) If you think I am making too many excuses for my patients, I will let you know that I am often one of the first people to make excuses for them in their lives and am happy to do so for no fee whatsoever. I would juggle speculums if they asked. I have not yet been asked to do this.

Additionally, the women who come to terminate their pregnancies at my clinic and in general are disproportionately poor. Is this because poor people are disproportionately stupid and can’t use a condom or don’t believe it works or whatever? Nope! It’s because poor people are disproportionately fucked by the system. I could tell you things that would make you SO MAD but I won’t. OK fine, I will, just one thing.

If a patient who has just gotten an abortion wants an IUD — the most effective form of birth control, little chance for user error, good for five or 10 years depending on which kind you get — they have to come back for it, not because there’s any clinical reason to wait, but because Medicaid doesn’t cover two procedures in one day. Most of the time the way this ends up breaking down is they come back for their follow-up appointment, then again for a pap smear/pelvic exam to “clear” them for the IUD, then one more time for the insertion. All to make sure it gets covered. And also please don’t get pregnant at any point in that month-long process where you don’t have your preferred method of contraception because then the process repeats. Man, are they ever stupid not to pay for it themselves with the five hundred dollars they allotted that year specifically for that purpose! I wonder what else they’re dumb at.

But “the remorseful patient” is the only patient whom your nice-but-then-surprisingly-conservative aunt is going to be like, “Well, I mean, I don’t believe in it, but if she was really sorry. And if she was married and it was crazy how it happened.” If you need help recruiting your aunt and others who are not quite on board with us no-hierarchy-of-abortion people yet, try my favorite fact for this situation: 65% of women who get abortions in this country are already moms! Smile, there’s a 65% chance your mother chose abortion because she wanted to make sure she could take care of her already-existing children, i.e., you. If that doesn’t work, take the “trend” angle and say how more evidence is showing that contraceptive sabotage is part of domestic violence. And just as no one is immune to contraception just straight up not working, no one is immune to those probably-apocryphal “I Didn’t Know I Was Pregnant” stories, so encourage their recounting and then bring it on home. Should these women be forced to have a baby, too? I’ll be seeing both of you at the potluck next week!

4th question: What is the craziest thing you’ve encountered?

Every day I have gone into the clinic I cannot help but feel I'm working with the heavy shit — high drama. Not just the threat of violence and the content of the work but the fact that the news has a way of showing up in your waiting room pretty much daily. I shall call this place that is so dense with significance “Nightmare Town.” Which includes pro-life patients! Yes! They too get abortions! I will tell you the story of the one who was my patient.

I was with the doctor I train with doing the initial steps of an intake — an ultrasound to date the pregnancy and a full history.The patient says to the doctor, “I should not be here today. I agree with the people out there.” Gestures out window to street. The people at the bus stop???? “The people who are protesting. I think what you are doing is wrong. I think you should be killed.” Oh. Whoaaaa!

Dr. S does a clinical version of “Werewolf-ing Yourself” which consists of extensively documenting this woman’s ambivalence in the chart, alerting the counseling staff to a patient who would require a lot of support and quickly peacing out of the room before she voiced any of the many justifiable but possibly hurtful words that could come in response to someone looking you in the eye and telling you that you should die for what you do. The only thing that she did say before closing the door was to me, and it was “Your turn!” This is because my secret healthcare superpower is invulnerability to other people’s cognitive dissonance, no matter how profound.

So I told my patient what I truly believe, which is: “I’m so sorry that you feel that way because feeling that way has got to make this an even harder decision than it already is. I imagine it must really feel awful to think that you have to do something that goes against your own beliefs.” (Secret inspiration: my own feelings about the situation!) “I know there is no way you're going to go home feeling you did the absolute right thing no matter what happens today. We are not going to do any procedure until you are absolutely certain that this is what you want. I do not want you to have an abortion. The only that I want you to do is the thing that is most right for you, whether it’s continuing this pregnancy and becoming a parent, or adoption, or abortion.” Then we brought her with her boyfriend to the counselor who talked with them for hours about the spectrum of resources available for not just abortion but adoption and parenting. At my clinic, we joke that we turn away more patients than the protestors do. And although she did end up terminating the pregnancy, the procedure went well, there were no complications, and she told the staff we had been the “most supportive!” I personally thanked her and told her it was an honor to be there for her and still get teary when I think about it. Ice burn, Lila Rose!

Another visit to Nightmare Town. One week, on a Monday, I read about the Burris Amendment, which was an amendment to the defense bill that would have let soldiers have abortions in military facilities overseas. I read “Current law bans abortions in most cases at military facilities, even if women pay themselves, meaning they must go outside to private hospitals and clinics — an impossibility for many of the estimated 100,000 American servicewomen in foreign countries, particularly in Iraq and Afghanistan.” It was struck down. Couple days later one of our patients was a soldier from Afghanistan. Hey, I was just reading about you guys.

No contraception around (she was stationed pretty far out) meant that she got pregnant. "Regulations require that a woman be flown home within two weeks of the time she finds out she’s pregnant, a particular stigma for unmarried women that ends any future career advancement." Ends any future career advancement. For my patient, that meant that she had to figure out how to make it back to the states on her own. Even if she had chosen to “go straight,” it wouldn’tve been much better: “Servicewomen who make the decision to have an abortion must first seek approval from their commanding officer to take leave from their military duty and return to the United States or a country where abortion is legal.” (Guttmacher.) Ask your boss if you can please take off a while for your abortion. And no matter what, she had to pay for it all herself. So even though she knew she was pregnant almost immediately, it took eight weeks to make arrangements, travel plans and raise all the money. That means by the time she walked in our door, she was beginning her second trimester, which is a way more expensive and invasive procedure. She also had to spend eight more weeks than she had to miserably pregnant. In Afghanistan.

Her procedure went well with no complications (notice trend) and before she left, Dr. S took her hand and said, “Thank you for saving us out there.” She responded, “Hey, thanks for saving me over here today.” As I watched them the thought that someone somewhere had to be scripting this appeared and then immediately burst. Here's the policy that you can get pissed about, and now here's the person you were pissed for. I see a lot of people get frustrated and huffy about stuff, and you can, but then you have to promise to actually do something about it. I have the privilege to be reminded that this is someone’s life, not the New York Times Most Emailed Article. And it is an honor to be reminded. It makes me work harder. Being an abortion provider has meant that I drive home from work knowing I did something, actually everything in my power, to support people who needed it. It’s a privilege and it’s fucking awesome.



also, on the subject of women and what they think of abortion, quite a few have chimed in on this thread.
 
Who is anyone to decide to deprive those women of such a thing and decide that they might or will die as a result?

NPR asked just this question in a recent article.
Murder Case Puts Spotlight On Abortion Clinic Rules : NPR

Increasing safety regulations, particularly when dealing with a surgical procedure like abortion, would address this, but such regulations would bump up against the real or perceived increase in costs of running such facilities, as well as the real or perceived infringement on reproductive rights.
 
I fully agree. I don't understand that. Whatever happened to that Hippocratic Oath stuff?

If you believe that a fetus is a living being, like I do, then performing an abortion violates the Hippocratic Oath, no matter how you look at it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom