I wasn't saying that they need a moderate leader, I was saying that they need a leader who is a real Republican, not the bastardized version of a Republican that we've seen in recent decades - someone who is a fiscal conservative, but not a social conservative or a member of the religious right. Someone who will attract moderate and independent voters. Palin isn't the person to do this, obviously.
I remember reading about their financial statements they submitted to the campaign, and no, by the usual standard that politicians are measured against, the Palins are not wealthy. They're not starving or anything, but they're certainly not wealthy. I'm not sure where you're getting that they're rich. She gets her governor's salary and all the perks she's taken with that (the per diem the state is paying her to live in her own house, the free trips and accommodations for her family that the state is paying for, etc.). Her husband is an oil field worker - a very good wage, I'm sure, but then again, Alaska has a very high cost of living, plus, they have a large family to support by today's standards. I think he also does some commercial fishing on the side - is this the business you're referring to? At one point, he was a part owner of a car wash, but I don't think he has that any longer. Competing stories about the campaign clothes? I posted the official story, the one the campaign told many, many times to defend her, that the clothes were bought for her (the amount isn't in dispute, it's always been around 150k, although I have heard rumours of it being higher, but they're only rumours), and that after the campaign they were being "donated." I'm just saying that I don't believe for a second that they would have been donated if the campaign hadn't found itself with such a PR mess on it's hands. Those clothes would have found a nice home for themselves back in Alaska. So is she 'wealthy' enough to have gone out and bought herself 150k worth of clothing in one shot? Hardly. So, those are not the kind of means that she can afford to live within.
Palin has a "good record in Alaska?" Define "good record." Bridge to nowhere? Highest earmark money received? Found guilty of a breach of ethics? (The real investigative team, a bipartisan one, found her guilty. The one that found her not guilty was a BS thing she threw together herself, to try to dispute the real one.) Or are you talking approval ratings? Certainly her approval ratings are going to be high for now - she hasn't been in power long enough for the public to be disillusioned with her yet, plus there's those big, fat oil cheques she's distributing to everyone, redistributing the wealth. Now that the price of oil has dropped, she won't even be able to balance the state budget, nevermind send out oil cheques to keep herself in power. I wonder what her approval ratings will look like in 6 months or a year.
It's not just her manner of speaking that people deride, it's that if you listen, she says absolutely nothing. The woman speaks in Republican talking points, nothing more. It's like she doesn't have the ability to say anything substantive. I've seen her do this many, many times. She'll be asked a question, then she'll come back with a vague talking point reply, then the interviewer will ask a follow up in an effort to actually get her to answer the question, and then she essentially repeats what she said the first time. She sounds like an automaton who's only been programmed to say four or five things, and beyond that, she's got nothing. Even though I don't agree with about 95% of what you say, you do seem like a reasonably intelligent fellow. Surely you must recognize her doing this? McCain was able to discuss policy changes he wanted to make. That ability was completely beyond her.