Global Warming Revisited - Page 13 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 06-21-2015, 08:07 PM   #181
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,700
Local Time: 05:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the iron horse View Post
Who are the 97% ?



Quote from link posted:



Last week Secretary of State John Kerry warned graduating students at Boston College of the "crippling consequences" of climate change. "Ninety-seven percent of the world's scientists," he added, "tell us this is urgent."



Where did Mr. Kerry get the 97% figure? Perhaps from his boss, President Obama, who tweeted on May 16 that "Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous." Or maybe from NASA, which posted (in more measured language) on its website, "Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities."



We could go on, but the larger point is plain. There is no basis for the claim that 97% of scientists believe that man-made climate change is a dangerous problem.





Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer: The Myth of the Climate Change '97%' - WSJ

So it took me all of 30 seconds to google the answer. The 97% comes from climatologist polled. I mean, that makes sense right?

Let me ask you something IH, if there was a serious question theological question being asked, who would you want polled? Serious educated theologians or atheists? If there was a best practice car maintenance question being asked, who would you want polled? Mechanics, car part corporations that have an interest, or a bunch of Joe Schmo(s) that have Google?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________

__________________
BVS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2015, 01:20 AM   #182
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 12,394
Local Time: 06:12 PM
I find it funny that in my little rant... I just guessed that it was an atmospheric scientist poll that came to 97%.

Because, you know, a biologist is a scientist who 99 of 100 times doesn't see a damn second of coursework on atmospheric sciences. To ask them what they think wouldn't be anything more than hearsay, on most occasions. And I'm not picking on biologists... the same thing goes in reverse, and in all directions. I don't know shit past a sharp understanding high school biology.
__________________

__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 05:10 PM   #183
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,297
Local Time: 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the iron horse View Post
I'm just not buying the popular chant that the science is settled.

Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge".
--Isaac Asimov
__________________
anitram is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 05:20 PM   #184
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Polish-American Stronghold PA
Posts: 4,144
Local Time: 06:12 PM
"Follow the Money"
__________________
Oregoropa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 05:32 PM   #185
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,501
Local Time: 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregoropa View Post
"Follow the Money"


To Exxon.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 06:24 PM   #186
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Polish-American Stronghold PA
Posts: 4,144
Local Time: 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
To Exxon.
There is much more money being pumped into the Climate Change Industry by environmental groups, left wing foundations, and government agencies (who are chomping at the bit to reap the benefits of a carbon tax).

There is more money available to climate scientists through government grants to fund research in the direction of a changing climate. The science has been politicized and monetized.

Way back in the thread I explained my experience. I have a BS in Atmospheric Science and took courses in climatology. The instructor and guest instructor for my classes were skeptics. One was very vocal and has appeared in national media. But if the one had voiced any opinion against the current dogma he would have been stripped of his title as State Climatologist. Much like what happened to skeptic and state Climatologist of Oregon George Taylor several years ago. Basically professionals can be blacklisted. And why? Because it all comes down to money.

This article shows the money flowing to scientists on each side of the argument.

'Dark Money' Funds To Promote Global Warming Alarmism Dwarf Warming 'Denier' Research - Forbes
__________________
Oregoropa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 07:28 PM   #187
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 12,394
Local Time: 06:12 PM
"Climate change industry."

Good one.

Actually, what you're witnessing is called "capitalism." An opportunity for business because something opens the door. That doesn't make the science fabricated. You end up sounding unnecessarily like a conspiracy theorist.
__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 08:36 PM   #188
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,501
Local Time: 06:12 PM
And said "climate change" industry is dwarfed by the fossil fuel industry, as well as automobile manufacturers, aerospace, etc.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 09:02 PM   #189
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 12,394
Local Time: 06:12 PM
Yeah. Aside from bankers and Walmart, I'm pretty sure oil companies are the biggest companies in the world in terms of cash flow.
__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 09:10 PM   #190
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,297
Local Time: 06:12 PM
Depends on what you mean by cash flow, but generally yes.

The world's most valuable company (by far) is an oil company.
__________________
anitram is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 09:52 PM   #191
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 12,394
Local Time: 06:12 PM
Yeah that's what I was going after... the amount of money they're worth. The buying power. Wasn't really trying to be super precise, just making a point that whatever the fictitious "climate change industry" is... that argument doesn't hold up if someone tries to claim "vested interest."
__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 10:00 PM   #192
Refugee
 
nbelcik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,457
Local Time: 03:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregoropa View Post
There is much more money being pumped into the Climate Change Industry by environmental groups, left wing foundations, and government agencies (who are chomping at the bit to reap the benefits of a carbon tax).



There is more money available to climate scientists through government grants to fund research in the direction of a changing climate. The science has been politicized and monetized.



Way back in the thread I explained my experience. I have a BS in Atmospheric Science and took courses in climatology. The instructor and guest instructor for my classes were skeptics. One was very vocal and has appeared in national media. But if the one had voiced any opinion against the current dogma he would have been stripped of his title as State Climatologist. Much like what happened to skeptic and state Climatologist of Oregon George Taylor several years ago. Basically professionals can be blacklisted. And why? Because it all comes down to money.



This article shows the money flowing to scientists on each side of the argument.



'Dark Money' Funds To Promote Global Warming Alarmism Dwarf Warming 'Denier' Research - Forbes

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/02/22...referrer=&_r=0

Oh hey, one of the main climate deniers in the media and in science was found to have taken $1.2 million from fossil fuel companies and then didn't disclose the conflict of interest in violation of the ethical guidelines of many scientific journals.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics shows the average salary of a climatologist to be around $89,000 with a range of $49,000 to $135,000. So which side has more money for researchers?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________
nbelcik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 10:33 PM   #193
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 12,394
Local Time: 06:12 PM
Not to mention that there is no opposing "side."
__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 11:47 PM   #194
Refugee
 
nbelcik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,457
Local Time: 03:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7 View Post
Not to mention that there is no opposing "side."

Well the scientific debate is settled, but the political one is still raging.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________
nbelcik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 01:21 AM   #195
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 03:12 PM
My neighbor smoked a pack a day and lived to be 98
coacked to death on a burrito

tapatalk, it works
__________________

__________________
deep is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com