GARLAND, Texas 2 gunmen killed outside Muhammad cartoon contest

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
As much as people like to separate themselves from animals, we're not all that different, and some are much closer than others in their behavior.

Certain people (for the sake of precision, we'll call them "fuckheads") do what they want, when they want, simply because they want to do it, regardless of the consequences. But because they need a way to justify their fuckery and get along in society, they'll piggyback off of a religious ideology or well-meaning political movement/protest/riot. This weak attempt at deflection works on some, but most see through it and rightfully place the blame on the fuckhead responsible.

These two Islamic men were fuckheads.
 
As much as people like to separate themselves from animals, we're not all that different, and some are much closer than others in their behavior.

Certain people (for the sake of precision, we'll call them "fuckheads") do what they want, when they want, simply because they want to do it, regardless of the consequences. But because they need a way to justify their fuckery and get along in society, they'll piggyback off of a religious ideology or well-meaning political movement/protest/riot. This weak attempt at deflection works on some, but most see through it and rightfully place the blame on the fuckhead responsible.

These two Islamic men were fuckheads.

If only it were that simple, that others would feel the same and agree. Online comments on some news articles indicate that many folks feel that these dudes were acting on behalf of Al Qaeda, that this is all a small step in Islam's takeover of the west, etc. :crack:

Off topic, but you are awake very late, I just saw your local time :ohmy:
 
As much as people like to separate themselves from animals, we're not all that different, and some are much closer than others in their behavior.

Actually we are very different and I really hate when something like this happens and we are compared to animals.

Animals do not have foresight, do not premeditate violence, do not understand the concept of multigenerational revenge and their behaviour is driven by instinct. What this has to do with terrorism, human-on-human opportunistic violence etc is beyond me.
 
Um, we are all biologically animals, you know.

Humans thinking they're different or distinct from every other animal on earth is what leads to things like religion claiming "dominion over the earth" and all kinds of various environmental abuses. When we segregate ourselves and see nature as "other" then we open ourselves up to abusing that "other" for our own benefit (which really isn't for our own long term benefit at all).

We are definitely no different from any other animal at all. We just happened to hit the evolutionary jackpot with our opposable thumbs, vocal cords and tongues and large brains. Lots of other animals are capable of reasoning, self awareness, learning, foresight, premeditated violence, abstract reasoning, and revenge across generations, just like lots of humans are incapable of many of those things.

Let's not put ourselves on a pedestal. We are just as much animals as skunks, elephants, and squid.
 
We are very different and distinct from every other animal on Earth and to deny that on the basis of it feeding the ego of religion is rather silly.
 
to deny that on the basis of it feeding the ego of religion is rather silly.


That's not what I said at all.

Our cultural and social situations are very different from the various species of animals, of course that's easy to see but it results from historical factors. I'm talking about biologically. Homo sapiens is just another species of animal, natural selection (and the Cretaceous extinction event) just happened to give us a fantastic deal.
 
Let's not put ourselves on a pedestal. We are just as much animals as skunks, elephants, and squid.

I wasn't putting us on a pedestal.

It should be pretty clear that I think we are far worse.

And no, our brains do not work like that of even the lower primates, nevermind non-mammals.
 
I managed to unwittingly derail this thread with a couple of sentences. :doh:

Not that it was going great before.
 
Why not list the largest Muslim country in the world, Indonesia, where 18% support the death penalty for leaving Islam, similar to Turkey's 17%? Also, the country with the third largest Muslim population in the world, India, is not listed anywhere.

Quit being an Islamophobe and grouping a small percentage of extremist terrorists with the overwhelming majority of peaceful Muslims.


Almost 1/5 of the population is definitely not some "small percentage." While it may not be representative of the whole, that is a very large section of Muslims that believe in things that completely contradict basic human rights. And this is in more liberal, secular countries, which is most definitely not the norm in the Middle-East. Lets take into account the poll results from some of the other countries BEAL quoted.

Turkey:
Total Population: 77,695,904 Muslim Population: 99.8% -> 77,540,512 Those who believe in death to Apostates: 17% -> 13,181,887

Malaysia:
Pop: 28,334,000 Muslim: 60% -> 17,000,400 Death to Apostates: 62% -> 10,540,248

Afghanistan:
Pop: 31,108,077 Muslim: 99.7% -> 17,000,400 Death to Apostates: 79% -> 24,501,655

Egypt:
Pop: 84,314,000 Muslim: 90% -> 75,882,600 Death to Apostates: 86% -> 62,259,036

Jordan:
Pop: 6,508,887 Muslim: 92% -> 5,988,176 Death to Apostates: 82% -> 4,910,304

Lebanon:
Pop: 5,882,562 Muslim: 54% -> 3,176,583 Death to Apostates: 46% -> 1,461,228

Iraq:
Pop: 36,000,000 Muslim: 95% -> 34,200,000 Death to Apostates: 42% -> 14,364,000

Now if we add all those up, that's 131,218,35 out of a total Muslim population of around 244,800,000. That is not a small percentage. I don't know how many people were polled, (cite?) so that's probably a lot of extrapolating and not a completely accurate number. Regardless, I think it's safe to say that at least 100 million, close to half the Muslims in these countries hold the kind of beliefs that motivate Islamic terrorism across the globe, and that's a serious problem.

That's not Islamaphobia, that's a sad truth. Islam lacks any kind of modern reform, which it so desperately needs.
 
I'll present to you this counter-point:

So fucking what?

What difference does it make that x percentage of people in Malaysia think Islamic apostates should be put to death? You're not a Muslim apostate, this statistic affects you in precisely zero ways, so why are you walking around clutching at pearls over this? Why are you so scared of the Muslim world, 95% of whom (at least) don't really give a fuck either way about "apostates" to do a damn thing about it? I'm sure a large percentage of American Christians feel similarly, and that percentage would undoubtedly be much higher if Christianity was the official religion of the USA. However only a very tiny minority I'm sure would ever actually physically follow through on that thought, the majority either wouldn't care THAT much, at least not enough to actually put a system in place to kill apostates on a wide scale.

"But it only takes a couple of them to come over here and kill us" - you are far, FAR more likely to be hit by a bus on the way to work this morning than killed by a terrorist. Why be so terrified about something that has such an astronomical chance of actually happening to you? We didn't react with hysteria the first time a bus ran someone over, we put safety measures in place as much as possible, accepted that some people are going to get hurt from time to time and got on with our lives.

So again, I ask you, what difference does it make in your life that Mr and Mrs Mohammed and Ranjaya Sanjit and their son Kamal who live in the suburbs of Karachi think that Muslim apostates should be put to death, as why do you keep posting about it as if it's some grave threat to our existence that we in the west should be running scared from all the time?
 
^

While that may be true, I am more concerned with the treatment of women in Islamic countries and the views of the majority of people there. We in the west have been an UTTER FAILURE when it comes to properly, loudly and consistently criticizing those societies on this particular issue. We, western progressives, get more upset by issues such as employers paying for birth control pills than the fact that women are still stoned to death for adultery, cannot drive, cannot vote, and have almost zero human rights to speak of.
 
^

While that may be true, I am more concerned with the treatment of women in Islamic countries and the views of the majority of people there. We in the west have been an UTTER FAILURE when it comes to properly, loudly and consistently criticizing those societies on this particular issue. We, western progressives, get more upset by issues such as employers paying for birth control pills than the fact that women are still stoned to death for adultery, cannot drive, cannot vote, and have almost zero human rights to speak of.


:applaud: :up:


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
^

While that may be true, I am more concerned with the treatment of women in Islamic countries and the views of the majority of people there. We in the west have been an UTTER FAILURE when it comes to properly, loudly and consistently criticizing those societies on this particular issue. We, western progressives, get more upset by issues such as employers paying for birth control pills than the fact that women are still stoned to death for adultery, cannot drive, cannot vote, and have almost zero human rights to speak of.


Indeed, acting like a viewpoint undoubtedly held by a huge number of people in all religions ("converts should be killed") is a grave horrifying threat is pointless. This is the kind of shit that needs to be addressed if Islamic extremism is ever going to be reduced to a negligible point. Moaning about people's thoughts on apostates and heretics is just irrelevant as hell.
 
^

While that may be true, I am more concerned with the treatment of women in Islamic countries and the views of the majority of people there. We in the west have been an UTTER FAILURE when it comes to properly, loudly and consistently criticizing those societies on this particular issue. We, western progressives, get more upset by issues such as employers paying for birth control pills than the fact that women are still stoned to death for adultery, cannot drive, cannot vote, and have almost zero human rights to speak of.

Except that this isn't an Islamic problem. It's mostly cultural and economic in nature. The treatment of women you're talking about exists only in the fucked up Middle-Eastern nations and some extremely poor, uneducated African countries.

None of this applies to countries like Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and Turkey... five countries which account for HALF of the Muslim population in the world by the way. And yes, there is a LOT of room for improvement in these countries when it comes to human rights. But even the majority of human rights violations in these places occur in the rural, uneducated and poor segments of society. I think you'd be surprised by how progressive the educated, urban portions of these societies really are.

I say this a lot; education is the silver bullet for this problem. Education and economics. An educated, prosperous Islamic state will be an integrated and harmonious part of the world. The alternative serves as a recruiting pool for the terrorists and nut-jobs.
 
None of this applies to countries like Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and Turkey... five countries which account for HALF of the Muslim population in the world by the way. And yes, there is a LOT of room for improvement in these countries when it comes to human rights. But even the majority of human rights violations in these places occur in the rural, uneducated and poor segments of society. I think you'd be surprised by how progressive the educated, urban portions of these societies really are.

India? Bangladesh? Pakistan? There are some APPALLING laws and judicial approaches in each of those whereas women are concerned. The fact that the urban population in some of these nations is well educated and modern does not negate the actual state's approach. I can't speak for Turkey or Indonesia as I am far less familiar with their legal systems or the issues there.

And it's arguable whether this is an "Islamic" problem or a "cultural" problem when the truth is that you can not really separate the two, because an underlying tenet of Islam is that it must permeate the social fabric, which is how each Islamic nation is governed.
 
India? Bangladesh? Pakistan? There are some APPALLING laws and judicial approaches in each of those whereas women are concerned. The fact that the urban population in some of these nations is well educated and modern does not negate the actual state's approach. I can't speak for Turkey or Indonesia as I am far less familiar with their legal systems or the issues there.

And it's arguable whether this is an "Islamic" problem or a "cultural" problem when the truth is that you can not really separate the two, because an underlying tenet of Islam is that it must permeate the social fabric, which is how each Islamic nation is governed.

You talked about women not having the right to drive or vote and being stoned to death for adultery. I was responding to that. These things don't even remotely apply to India, Pakistan or Bangladesh.

And I did actually say that there is a LOT of room for improvement in these countries when it comes to human rights violations. Of course there is. But saying that the problem is Islam is an incredibly reductive way of looking at a very complex issue.
 
You talked about women not having the right to drive or vote and being stoned to death for adultery. I was responding to that. These things don't even remotely apply to India, Pakistan or Bangladesh.

And I did actually say that there is a LOT of room for improvement in these countries when it comes to human rights violations. Of course there is. But saying that the problem is Islam is an incredibly reductive way of looking at a very complex issue.

Except nobody said that the problem was Islam, rather that the problem was the treatment of women in Islamic countries. Clearly a complex issue.
 
Except that this isn't an Islamic problem. It's mostly cultural and economic in nature. The treatment of women you're talking about exists only in the fucked up Middle-Eastern nations and some extremely poor, uneducated African countries.

None of this applies to countries like Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and Turkey...

I beg to differ.
 
Except nobody said that the problem was Islam, rather that the problem was the treatment of women in Islamic countries. Clearly a complex issue.

Yes, there most certainly is a huge problem with women's rights in Islamic countries. But it most certainly is not specific to Islamic countries. Women are mistreated in the same (or worse) way in a lot of non-Muslim countries in Africa and Asia.

I just think we need to be more careful with our rhetoric in the current global environment. There is no doubt the Islamic world needs a major overhaul in its institutions and cultural psyche, but I am absolutely certain that the change needs to come from within. The majority of the Muslim world completely rejects the actions and ideology of the lunatics, but it needs to start doing so actively rather than passively now.
 
Almost 1/5 of the population is definitely not some "small percentage." While it may not be representative of the whole, that is a very large section of Muslims that believe in things that completely contradict basic human rights. And this is in more liberal, secular countries, which is most definitely not the norm in the Middle-East. Lets take into account the poll results from some of the other countries BEAL quoted.

Turkey:
Total Population: 77,695,904 Muslim Population: 99.8% -> 77,540,512 Those who believe in death to Apostates: 17% -> 13,181,887

Malaysia:
Pop: 28,334,000 Muslim: 60% -> 17,000,400 Death to Apostates: 62% -> 10,540,248

Afghanistan:
Pop: 31,108,077 Muslim: 99.7% -> 17,000,400 Death to Apostates: 79% -> 24,501,655

Egypt:
Pop: 84,314,000 Muslim: 90% -> 75,882,600 Death to Apostates: 86% -> 62,259,036

Jordan:
Pop: 6,508,887 Muslim: 92% -> 5,988,176 Death to Apostates: 82% -> 4,910,304

Lebanon:
Pop: 5,882,562 Muslim: 54% -> 3,176,583 Death to Apostates: 46% -> 1,461,228

Iraq:
Pop: 36,000,000 Muslim: 95% -> 34,200,000 Death to Apostates: 42% -> 14,364,000

Now if we add all those up, that's 131,218,35 out of a total Muslim population of around 244,800,000. That is not a small percentage. I don't know how many people were polled, (cite?) so that's probably a lot of extrapolating and not a completely accurate number. Regardless, I think it's safe to say that at least 100 million, close to half the Muslims in these countries hold the kind of beliefs that motivate Islamic terrorism across the globe, and that's a serious problem.

That's not Islamaphobia, that's a sad truth. Islam lacks any kind of modern reform, which it so desperately needs.

I don't think the Islamic religion is the problem which is why I pointed to Muslims in India, Turkey, Indonesia and other places. I think Arab culture and conditions often found in third world countries are what really contribute to the percentages we see for the support of things considered to be a violation of human rights.

Notice that most of the countries you site above are Arab countries. This suggest that it is Arab culture and the economic conditions in these countries that have led to the high percentage of support there for these violations of human rights. If the problem was Islam you would find these same percentages in India, Turkey, and Indonesia, but you don't.

Remember, there are nearly 2 Billion people that follow Islam worldwide. They should not be painted with the same brush because of the conditions in a few select countries.
 
I'll present to you this counter-point:

So fucking what?

What difference does it make that x percentage of people in Malaysia think Islamic apostates should be put to death? You're not a Muslim apostate, this statistic affects you in precisely zero ways, so why are you walking around clutching at pearls over this? Why are you so scared of the Muslim world, 95% of whom (at least) don't really give a fuck either way about "apostates" to do a damn thing about it? I'm sure a large percentage of American Christians feel similarly, and that percentage would undoubtedly be much higher if Christianity was the official religion of the USA. However only a very tiny minority I'm sure would ever actually physically follow through on that thought, the majority either wouldn't care THAT much, at least not enough to actually put a system in place to kill apostates on a wide scale.

"But it only takes a couple of them to come over here and kill us" - you are far, FAR more likely to be hit by a bus on the way to work this morning than killed by a terrorist. Why be so terrified about something that has such an astronomical chance of actually happening to you? We didn't react with hysteria the first time a bus ran someone over, we put safety measures in place as much as possible, accepted that some people are going to get hurt from time to time and got on with our lives.

So again, I ask you, what difference does it make in your life that Mr and Mrs Mohammed and Ranjaya Sanjit and their son Kamal who live in the suburbs of Karachi think that Muslim apostates should be put to death, as why do you keep posting about it as if it's some grave threat to our existence that we in the west should be running scared from all the time

Did I say I was afraid of Muslims? You know, criticizing Islam/Muslims and calling for reform doesn't make one Islamaphobic. I've read a lot of Muslim scholars who do just that.

You may not think "death to Apostates" is a big deal, but the point I was making was that Muslims who believe in that are generally the same ones who view women as objects, reject secularism, hate the West, wish death upon those who insult the Prophet, etc.

And a lot of those sympathize and support Islamist terror groups. And in this case, two people tried to shoot up (and hilariously failed) a Mohammed cartoon event. So yeah, that's why something as simple as "death to Apostates" matters; it points to a bigger picture, and it's not a good one.
 
Back
Top Bottom