yolland
Forum Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2004
- Messages
- 7,471
Fake News Alert: "Hersh Says Cheney, Sharon Plotted Hariri and Bhutto Assassinations"
So yesterday several Pakistani and Indian news sites (Dawn, Nation, WebIndia123, Thaindian) foolishly reported without checking--then some morons at Wall Street Journal and American Spectator passed on--a bizarre claim, of as-yet-unclear origin, that American journalist Seymour Hersh had revealed to "an Arab TV channel" that a death squad answering to Dick Cheney, headed by US Gen. Stanley McChrystal, and featuring Ariel Sharon as a key player was behind the assassinations of both Benazir Bhutto and Rafik Hariri.
Fortunately, Hersh heard about the story within several hours, and immediately came out with a public statement that it was "complete madness." Most of the offending news sites have since taken down their links (though Raw Story managed to capture some screenshots of the evidence at WSJ and AmSpec).
Hersh had done an interview last week with GulfTV, in which he was asked again about allegations he'd made on CNN back in March that the Joint Special Ops Command had been reporting directly to Cheney concerning targeted assassinations of 'high-value' terrorists (CNN then spoke with Cheney's former national security adviser John Hannah, who acknowledged such actions occur but denied the direct executive oversight). Bhutto and Sharon were never mentioned by either Hersh or the GulfTV reporter, and Hersh never suggested that JSOC was involved in political assassinations nor spoke of a Cheney "death squad." The GulfTV reporter did ask if JSOC could've been responsible for Hariri's assassination, to which Hersh replied, "No--Hariri, America--no. Impossible, there was no reason."
There have been numerous discomfiting instances in the past couple years of otherwise-respectable news outlets publishing unverified info from blogs or emails which turned out to be B.S. This is one of the worst I've seen, though. How could it not have occurred to any of these editors to ask "Which Arab channel, and when?" How could it not have occurred to them that a man in a coma might experience certain problems playing a key role in a death squad? I can understand the South Asian sites, particularly the two Indian ones which aren't hugely reputable to begin with, perhaps not being familiar with Sy Hersh, but come on, what kind of boneheads do they have working at WSJ and American Spectator now that they didn't detect at least a little whiff of bullshit here?
So yesterday several Pakistani and Indian news sites (Dawn, Nation, WebIndia123, Thaindian) foolishly reported without checking--then some morons at Wall Street Journal and American Spectator passed on--a bizarre claim, of as-yet-unclear origin, that American journalist Seymour Hersh had revealed to "an Arab TV channel" that a death squad answering to Dick Cheney, headed by US Gen. Stanley McChrystal, and featuring Ariel Sharon as a key player was behind the assassinations of both Benazir Bhutto and Rafik Hariri.
Fortunately, Hersh heard about the story within several hours, and immediately came out with a public statement that it was "complete madness." Most of the offending news sites have since taken down their links (though Raw Story managed to capture some screenshots of the evidence at WSJ and AmSpec).
Hersh had done an interview last week with GulfTV, in which he was asked again about allegations he'd made on CNN back in March that the Joint Special Ops Command had been reporting directly to Cheney concerning targeted assassinations of 'high-value' terrorists (CNN then spoke with Cheney's former national security adviser John Hannah, who acknowledged such actions occur but denied the direct executive oversight). Bhutto and Sharon were never mentioned by either Hersh or the GulfTV reporter, and Hersh never suggested that JSOC was involved in political assassinations nor spoke of a Cheney "death squad." The GulfTV reporter did ask if JSOC could've been responsible for Hariri's assassination, to which Hersh replied, "No--Hariri, America--no. Impossible, there was no reason."
There have been numerous discomfiting instances in the past couple years of otherwise-respectable news outlets publishing unverified info from blogs or emails which turned out to be B.S. This is one of the worst I've seen, though. How could it not have occurred to any of these editors to ask "Which Arab channel, and when?" How could it not have occurred to them that a man in a coma might experience certain problems playing a key role in a death squad? I can understand the South Asian sites, particularly the two Indian ones which aren't hugely reputable to begin with, perhaps not being familiar with Sy Hersh, but come on, what kind of boneheads do they have working at WSJ and American Spectator now that they didn't detect at least a little whiff of bullshit here?
Last edited: