yolland
Forum Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2004
- Messages
- 7,471
Andrew Sullivan, July 18
I doubt this story will attract much interest outside New York (Kiryas Joel has been regionally notorious for years), quite possibly I'm wasting my time posting it here, but what I keep coming back to about it is smirking wryly at the contrast between the "So-what,-buncha-Jews-in-NY-squabbling-over-nothing" in this case, vs. the shit-your-pants sharia-takeover panic that would undoubtedly ensue were there a Muslim equivalent of Kiryas Joel in America. I wouldn't say the average American's perception of Hasidic and haredi American Jews is "positive" exactly--my sense is they're generally viewed as "freaks" and rather discomfiting to be around; nonetheless, like the Amish, these are fundamentalist, deeply traditional, assimilation-resistant groups who (in contrast to strictly observant Muslims) are protected from scrutiny by being generally stereotyped as harmlessly or even charmingly exotic.
A little hard to predict where this lawsuit might go, since there are at least two readily imaginable responses: A) that this is no worse than numerous other notorious cases of local political corruption in recent US history, and none of those municipalities were dissolved, so this is like using the proverbial sledgehammer to crack nuts; or B) that the US Constitution explicitly aims to absolutely prevent this particular form of corruption--religious figures abusing political power to persecute dissidents--so dissolving this sorry exercise in publically funded religious authoritarianism is precisely the appropriate and American response.The fascinating town of Kiryas Joel, a rapidly-growing community of Satmar Hasidic Jews in upstate New York, has been getting a lot of media coverage lately. The town is technically the poorest in the nation, but the residents thrive through a combination of collectivism, a largely cash-based economy, the tax-exempt status of their religious and non-profit institutions, and their ability to secure a disproportionate share of state and federal funds by voting and fundraising in a bloc. [Americans United for Separation of Church and State] has been tracking the coverage:
A sign at the village entrance admonishes visitors to dress modestly. Cleavage-revealing tops for women are verboten, and both sexes are told to cover arms and legs. Couples are advised to “maintain gender separation in public places.” The sign was erected by the town’s largest synagogue. Its wording is tough, but in fact the village can’t legally enforce rules like this. Still, women who dare to visit the community while wearing skimpy summer outfits have reported scowls and glares.
[AUSCS] also points to a more substantive story: dissident Jews in Kiryas Joel have filed a federal lawsuit attempting the dissolve the town because its leadership "violates the First Amendment's prohibition against the government respecting an establishment of religion":
The case alleges discrimination against dissidents—estimated in court papers to comprise 40% of the village's roughly 20,000 residents—in various facets of public life, from tax exemptions for synagogues to election improprieties to selective enforcement of village noise ordinances. Among the most serious allegations is that Kiryas Joel's Public Safety Department, a quasi-police agency, has acted as enforcers for the main congregation and tolerated acts of violence and intimidation against dissidents by unruly crowds of young supporters of Satmar Grand Rebbe Aron Teitelbaum, the leader of Kiryas Joel's majority faction. In one incident in August 2010, a mob of screaming boys—angry about a marriage held in a dissident wedding hall—allegedly hounded relatives of one of the newlyweds as they walked home from a synagogue after midnight. The complaint says the boys punched, kicked and threw bottles and eggs at the family, which included a pregnant woman. The suit alleges that public safety officers passed by during the harassment and did nothing.
I doubt this story will attract much interest outside New York (Kiryas Joel has been regionally notorious for years), quite possibly I'm wasting my time posting it here, but what I keep coming back to about it is smirking wryly at the contrast between the "So-what,-buncha-Jews-in-NY-squabbling-over-nothing" in this case, vs. the shit-your-pants sharia-takeover panic that would undoubtedly ensue were there a Muslim equivalent of Kiryas Joel in America. I wouldn't say the average American's perception of Hasidic and haredi American Jews is "positive" exactly--my sense is they're generally viewed as "freaks" and rather discomfiting to be around; nonetheless, like the Amish, these are fundamentalist, deeply traditional, assimilation-resistant groups who (in contrast to strictly observant Muslims) are protected from scrutiny by being generally stereotyped as harmlessly or even charmingly exotic.
Last edited: